peevee1: No VR again. For tripod-only photographers.
You have parkinson or really bad pulse
Excellent, more crap that nobody needs
Der Steppenwolf: Here is a D610 review:It's a D600 with functioning shutter.
And more expensive.
Klarth: Why does everyone wants VR on every lens?
Do you have Parkinson's?
That's where technique come in handy
Why does everyone wants VR on every lens?
ManuelVilardeMacedo: It was all going well until I read the word 'smartphone'. A useful tool, they say, in that it helps with composition and calculating depth of field... WHAT?C'mon: a mobile phone is always in everyone's pocket and it's useful in case of an emergency; but saying a smartphone is useful for helping with compositional basics and calculating depth of field is pushing things too far. If you can't compose and determine depth of field by looking into the viewfinder, chances are you suck as a photographer. In such case the iPhone won't help your case.
Oh yeah... Poor Ansel Adams. He didn't have an Iphone.
"...if you plan on taking serious pictures"
Thanks for making me laugh!!!
T34: Well, so you think this lens will be the equal of a Nikon or Canon 24-70mm f2.8? Guess again! You get what you pay for in Life, Tamron lenses are Junk! For every Ten they make, maybe your lucky enough to get one that's actually sharp, the rest will be soft. Don't waste your money!
Another man's junk...
But i agree that Sigma QC is deplorable.