Ben O Connor: İts like rolex watch. Surely there are multi functional army watches by far better priced from CasioOr there are thousand other car brands. No need the drive Rolls-Royce ...
IT - IS - A -UNIQUE - LUXURY- ITEM !!!
I also don't see ANY logic to buy something exact same than Panasonic models. But this one is UNIQUE !
"I also don't see ANY logic to buy something exact same than Panasonic models. But this one is UNIQUE !"
Very funny to see how some people don't know at anything about what there are talking about :-)
Depreview: "Pair the X-T1 up with lenses like the stellar XF 23mm F1.4R or the XF 56mm F1.2R and it can produce absolutely wonderful results, aided substantially by its ability to focus them accurately wide open without any fuss. The net result is that the overall image quality it can offer, as a combination of camera and lens, is exceptional. The flipside though is that the lenses are all pretty expensive; as yet Fujifilm doesn't offer anything to match the smaller, slower but cheaper primes you'll find in other systems."
I dont understand why Dpreview say that fuji's "super primes" is to expencive ?Same type of lenses from Canon and Nikon is even more expencive, and what about Leica ? :-)))
Thanks a lot!BRKim
Thanks for the your nice comments ;-)I have looked for your images ... but hard to find....
So sad to see all these "stupid" comments from people who even not have had their hands on X-Pro1. These raw files looks completly wrong. I am so happy for the output I get from my X-Pro1 and its so much better than what I see here. I own Nikon D700 also (And love it), but my Fuji X-Pro1 is doing a better job when I compare image quality.
Looks very good! Extremely sharp, good color ect.