sarkozy

They should use the full automatic ;)

buy a Ur-K-05, and they have the better camera

and the people who do not fall for any "innovation"

yes - the photo of the year in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

my old "UR- K-5" still rocks the scene ;)

I own an E-M5 and do not buy any other 4/3

I find 4/3 wonderful -
I think 16 MP is awesome -
and I stick to my OM-D E-M5 -
the E-M1 I do not want

I'm of the opinion that the image quality of the X100 is still the no. 1. Nevertheless, the X100s earns the gold medal.

why not - for me, the X100 has a gold medal

Cong. FUJI for Gold - awesome Camera

I prefer to buy a second Nikon V1

shutter 1/4000 is to bad
a shutter 1/8000 or 1/16000 (electronically) could have induced me to buy this camera

think you can shoot with any camera - so far where is the problem - I still use my X100, which is now two to three years old: The photos are not bad - on the contrary

tell you about their new one with a new serial number: hope for you that the problem is resolved, but I am skeptical

No, the D600 is clearly the better image quality

I think it was a good decision to keep my K-5 and to waive the update

very good shot - compliments!

no!
the K-01 is an excellent camera -
Image quality at least at the height of the X-Pro1, if not better

and the winner is clearly the OM-D -why not?excellent picture quality and lens changes possibleThe image quality of the RX1 is no better, just a different DOF behavior, insofar no purchase decision...

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Compare-Camera-Sensors/Compare-cameras-side-by-side/(appareil1)/793%7C0/(brand)/Olympus/(appareil2)/663%7C0/(brand2)/Canonthink this is not a wise decision:-D