Tan68

Tan68

Lives in United States West Slope, CO, United States
Joined on Oct 5, 2008

Comments

Total: 643, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Adobe celebrates 25 years of Photoshop article (366 comments in total)
In reply to:

TheDreamingWatchman: A lot of people seem to believe that - if you buy and own software - you can use it forever; or at least for the next 25 years.

Sorry to be the one to break the news: You can't!

In 10 years your current computer will be old and retired or slow and useless or dead without chance of resurrection.

You will have a new computer and the new computer will have a new OS.

And there's a good chance your current Photoshop (or Capture One or whatever you own) will not work with the new OS because the OS will be new and your software will be old. Real old.

But don’t worry! You can still put the box with your software on a shelf and tell your grandchildren: This it Photoshop (or Caputure One) from 2014.
I bought it! I own it! It's mine! (My precious!)

And if only I could find an Emulator for Win7 (or OS X) for my Win 14 (or OS XIV) I could show you, what I can do with this little darling.
I’m sure it still works like a charm.

I don't expect we will have mouse and/or pen in 25 years.

I expect to have a little implant in my finger. It will connect by sourtooth to the computing device. I will just gesture with the finger to make my selection.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 20, 2015 at 18:33 UTC
On Adobe celebrates 25 years of Photoshop article (366 comments in total)

Now PS will qualify for a reduction in cost for auto insurance.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 20, 2015 at 18:30 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

Petroglyph: The new lenses are built to cover slightly more than FF image circle to allow all the things Pentax does with sensor shift. Astute observation DPR. Let's see that would be IBIS, pitch/roll stabilization, astro-tracker, scene recomposition, AA simulator, sensor-shift high resolution (someday probably not this year).

More orange juice.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 15, 2015 at 16:11 UTC

Orange juice is good in the morning.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 22:50 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

RichardBalonglong: It's time for me to save and have funding for this full frame Pentax before its release at the end of this year... I'm going to put up a Lemonade Stand... Lots and lots of Lemonade Stands to include the funding for the two new lenses..! LOL! =)

Not to mention peanut galleries; those are always a crowd pleaser !

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 18:44 UTC
In reply to:

Gazeomon: This must be the ugliest camera I have ever seen and I shoot Pentax for 2 years now (K5IIs, K3). My K3 is ugly but a very good photographic tool, I can live with it. This hideous looking new FF thing must be a truly amazing camera then. Not that I am getting too serious about the looks of a camera but I had to swallow hard a couple of times.

It do got a pointy head.
But the perspective is low.

Not the most flattering picture.

Swallowing hard... being a little overt in your protestations. I think it is a form of love. You are afraid your friends will think you a sissy. Be strong and take your new friend to the dance. They aren't true friends if they can't understand it is okay for you to love the one of your choice.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 14:41 UTC
On Manfrotto launches Off Road camera gear article (55 comments in total)

'Bag for life' reinforced with corn husks and gorilla tape.

Think 'what would Behr Grylls do'

Direct link | Posted on Jan 25, 2015 at 17:31 UTC as 3rd comment
On Manfrotto launches Off Road camera gear article (55 comments in total)
In reply to:

iPh0to: Why somebody would pick this up over a similar priced proper daypack like the f-stop Guru is beyond me. All those straps hanging ready to get snagged by a branch. Judging from the photo, there's no frame and hip support.

Guru looks to have mesh side pockets.
Those catch things, too.
If you are in an area with so many branches..

I just tuck in any extra of strap snugged down. When I have been in an area of tight branches (scrub tree or rhododendron) I find that all kinds of crap gets caught. Any top pocket on pack, space between me and pack... not just a strap.

I try to not go to places like that.
Too scary thinking of the mandrake root.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 25, 2015 at 17:27 UTC
In reply to:

TSeiler: I do not see the problem with this move. SI will still offer fantastic photography from stock photos and the photographers will have no problem finding another job.

Likely ironical.
I know I was being so :^)

Although.. honestly... I probably could be shown pictures from 2012, told they were the game last week, and never catch on :^|

Direct link | Posted on Jan 25, 2015 at 16:45 UTC

The photographers are laid off but the magazine will still need photos.

By laying these guys off, the magazine pays no benefits/tax.
The photographers become independent contractors and pick up their own health insurance and pay additional tax to be self employed.

The magazine will not sever business relations and start using mobile pics :^)
This is about costs for benefits and travel expense.

The only way they will not continue doing business with SI is if they ask prices that are too much even for their well recognized work. They will still get the better shots (based on comments below) and sell them to someone.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 25, 2015 at 16:33 UTC as 29th comment
In reply to:

TSeiler: I do not see the problem with this move. SI will still offer fantastic photography from stock photos and the photographers will have no problem finding another job.

Well, sure. Stock photos are fine. Sports Illustrated Lite for the people not really interested in sports.

One picture of a guy catching a ball could be used every several issues and I would never know. Flip it horizontal, rotate it a bit. Sell it to sports illumi-not-eh.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 25, 2015 at 16:29 UTC
In reply to:

Deardorff: OK guys, show me where Steiglitz, Adams, Cartier-Bresson ever wrote that they photographed with "analogue" or "analog".
It is as asinine as digIdiots who say their prints are "carbon" when hand poured carbon print are so far removed from what they produces as to be comparing horses and mosquitoes for herding cattle.

I did black and white stuff years ago. The only 'silver' I remember is silver halide treated with developer. I would need explanation of 'silver gelatin' as well :^|

I was offered this link by a.. confidential source. :^)
Carbon print: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tl5FK7PTkFw

Direct link | Posted on Nov 9, 2014 at 12:51 UTC
On hands in the An act of kindness challenge (9 comments in total)

I don't recall seeing a winning photo that has no 1/2 or 1 star votes.

That says as much, or more, than winning.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 9, 2014 at 12:08 UTC as 7th comment
On Manfrotto introduces new lens filter lineup article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

yonsarh: I only use filter when using expensive lenses, but for lenses under 500$ or 300$, I don't use filter. If it is high quality lens, lens protection is needed. I don't use lens hood because of vignetting.

Lens hoods on expensive lens vignette ?
All lens hoods vignette ?

Lens hoods are annoying.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2014 at 23:57 UTC
On Manfrotto introduces new lens filter lineup article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

BadScience: "pro" filters are to photography what monster cables are to hifi.

Argue the toss :^)

I have also used clear filter for sand in SW

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2014 at 23:06 UTC
In reply to:

Gesture: Or you can make your own for $5.

You know, I understand that is possible :^)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2014 at 21:10 UTC
In reply to:

Deardorff: OK guys, show me where Steiglitz, Adams, Cartier-Bresson ever wrote that they photographed with "analogue" or "analog".
It is as asinine as digIdiots who say their prints are "carbon" when hand poured carbon print are so far removed from what they produces as to be comparing horses and mosquitoes for herding cattle.

There was no need to differentiate between film and a thing that didn't exist at the time.

Growing up, I never specified a type of bulb for lighting household interiors. If it wasn't shaped like a long tube (or some circular tubes), it was just a 'light bulb'. Now, it isn't uncommon to call the same bulb an 'incandescent' to separate it from 'compact florescent' or 'LED' that are all found in houses. I knew the old bulbs were incandescent but no reason to call them that...

I get the point of your simile, but I wonder if a sufficiently thick cloud of mosquitoes couldn't herd cattle..? Maybe mosquitoes with nano-implants could be coordinated to corral cattle. Put the little buzzards to work :^|

+ what are carbon prints ?
is that what some people call.. prints now?
they are 'carbon' because they are on paper and can be held?

if so, that is silly. well, 'affected' more than silly. they mean to highlight the difference between the digital and carbon.. realms ?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2014 at 19:55 UTC
On Manfrotto introduces new lens filter lineup article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

Stephen123: Could be a way to sell Marumi filters to people who don’t know the name Marumi.

Except if they’re rebranded, why do they not have the rest of the sizes?

There is still a cost in changing things enough to change the appearance.

I figure they went with sizes they think most popular.
Things go well and they can add sizes.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2014 at 19:31 UTC
On Manfrotto introduces new lens filter lineup article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tan68: Interesting that they want to try filters...
I don't think they have offered filters before..?

The name may be more recognizable to some customers than other established filter providing companies. So, this should help them sell...? The names of their tiers is clear enough.

'Manfrotto' always makes me think of an Italian film star.
'Bogen' was fun to say :^|

Mine was stamped 'Bogen by Manfrotto'

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2014 at 19:12 UTC
On CHILDREN LAUGHING in the Kids at amusement parks challenge (2 comments in total)

The two girls on the left appear more limber than the young fellow on the right. Still, looks like he is having fun reaching for the feet :^)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2014 at 18:35 UTC as 2nd comment
Total: 643, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »