harrisoncac

Lives in Canada Ontario, Canada
Works as a CNC Machinist
Joined on Jul 19, 2008

Comments

Total: 86, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Ron Zamir: Now all we need is a pro nicro4-3 camera.

I think this opens the prelude to pro m4/3, just like Canon's 24-105mm L kit lens on 5D mark II and the 14-54mm on Olympus E-1.

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2011 at 07:16 UTC
On article Leica Announces V-Lux 3 superzoom (131 comments in total)

So how much will this camera be sold?

Panasonic FZ-150 was at USD330 on Black Friday.

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2011 at 20:17 UTC as 21st comment
On article Leica Announces V-Lux 3 superzoom (131 comments in total)

Buying this camera is just like adopting a kid for those who don't bear.

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2011 at 19:00 UTC as 26th comment | 1 reply

What is this camera? Most stupid and retarded design. Garbage.

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2011 at 05:41 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
On article Fujifilm releases X-S1 premium EXR 26X superzoom (383 comments in total)

Impressive camera. But the lens exterior design looks disgusting. The lens appears like a tilted barrel. You know we hate barrel anything on a lens. Not slim or good looking. Maybe the designer is just too much overweighted.

Link | Posted on Nov 24, 2011 at 06:55 UTC as 122nd comment
On article Just Posted: Samsung NX200 Studio Comparison for JPEG (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

magnumgf: Interesting. People are saying this is bad/terrible. What do those same people think of the Nikon V1 then? The Samsung stands head and shoulders above that thing...

Indeed. Anyone that wants a camera will first check the price, even those Nikon fanboys. Or Nikon just wants to use and rip off their fanboys.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2011 at 06:26 UTC
On GalleryItem:1510738 (1 comment in total)

Nice shot and beautiful model.

Posted on Oct 31, 2011 at 05:40 UTC as 1st comment

No matter what to don, you can not change the quirky characters of this cam.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2011 at 04:09 UTC as 20th comment
On article Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V review (72 comments in total)

No matter you like this review and the actual camera itself, B&H has now run out of stock of SONY HX100V.

Frustrated.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2011 at 04:37 UTC as 12th comment
On article Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V review (72 comments in total)

Dear DPR audience:
What do you say about HX100V against NIKON P500?

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2011 at 06:09 UTC as 30th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

sfseng: When Sony announced 12 fps, 24mp, HD Autofocus video mode camera ppl said nah~we don't need that! but when Canon announced 12 fps 18mp camera, handofocus (manual focus) HD video mode camera with 5x price of Sony ppl said wow that's the monster! what a brand bias......

Because they have no brain.

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2011 at 06:41 UTC
In reply to:

tkbslc: Looks pretty good, but let's remember this is a $750 lens on a $800 camera.

My goodness. $750 + $ 800 = ? $1550.00 !!
A SONY A77 or Canon 7D = $1400.00. A77 and 7D or Nikon's own D300s all are well below $1550. So why bother with this toy camera?
INSANE!

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2011 at 05:26 UTC

INSANE!

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2011 at 09:19 UTC as 28th comment
On article Book review: 500 Poses for Photographing Women (43 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: Oh great--irony--softcore books reviewed by dpreview.

jimread's view is correct. Or you are not able to memorize so many poses.

Link | Posted on Oct 10, 2011 at 22:55 UTC
In reply to:

aljudy: Somehow this is becoming a little insane. A fixed lens camera for $600 is a bargain! I must be in some other universe of camera owners... Al

Given the Olympus E-PL3 comes at CAD599.99 at retailer of Blacks Photography, I don't intend to pay 600 dollars for a fixed lens camera. And I have the choice of lot of lens choices to play with. The Panasonic G2 body is only at USD300.00.

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2011 at 02:32 UTC
In reply to:

Theelderkeynes: A price of $500 over there they translate to £450 here, interesting given the pound at 1.55 dollars. Or is it just greed?

These cameras cost well below USD100.00.
Not only are the manufacturers insatiable, but the retailers are too.
I found that for anything that a retailer sells, they can sell it at 1/3 of their price and still makes money.

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2011 at 15:22 UTC
On article Just Posted: Canon PowerShot S100 hands-on preview (165 comments in total)

Stupid looking camera. Canon should buy a SONY camera and study it carefully. No characteristic camera, one after another.

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2011 at 04:19 UTC as 8th comment | 2 replies
On article Nikon 1 System First Impressions (248 comments in total)

I think the very first people who buy these mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras are those who read and participate in this website other than compact updaters. 9 out 10 people who bought M4/3 or Nex's must have bought serious DSLR's. Those who are not interested in photography won't bother with these mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2011 at 07:57 UTC as 54th comment
On article Nikon V1 and J1 - hands-on first impressions (245 comments in total)
In reply to:

solsang: I think this could replace my lx5 for the very fast af alone, and better iq, have been waiting for this pixeldensity ever since the f31fd!

This fills the obvious lack between the m43 and compacts, why make a small body when you need bulky lenses?

Although the gf3 or ep mini with the 14-42 gx lens would make smaller combined size, the j1 and v1 could be competitors if the price is right

One camera type is missing: a big sensor, fixed zoom lens (for those who dont want to change lenses yet still want decent iq, the closest will be s100)

Agree. Unfortunately the price of the Nikon 1 isn't right, and it won't be any near competitor to M4/3 and NEX's.

I don't know why Sony didn't take their excellent R1 further. That camera has a large sensor and amazing Zeiss lens.

FujiFilm's bridge cameras were distinguish. How amazing their S5000Z, S7000 (2003), S9100 used to be!. After S100fs and S200EXR, FujiFilm seemed to take the path backwards. Now I no longer look at their offerings.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2011 at 07:23 UTC
On article Nikon V1 and J1 - hands-on first impressions (245 comments in total)
In reply to:

solsang: I think this could replace my lx5 for the very fast af alone, and better iq, have been waiting for this pixeldensity ever since the f31fd!

This fills the obvious lack between the m43 and compacts, why make a small body when you need bulky lenses?

Although the gf3 or ep mini with the 14-42 gx lens would make smaller combined size, the j1 and v1 could be competitors if the price is right

One camera type is missing: a big sensor, fixed zoom lens (for those who dont want to change lenses yet still want decent iq, the closest will be s100)

Agree. Unfortunately the price of the Nikon 1 isn't right, and it won't be any near competitor to M4/3 and NEX's.

I don't know why Sony didn't take their excellent R1 further. That camera has a large sensor and amazing Zeiss lens.

FujiFilm's bridge cameras were distinguish. How amazing their S5000Z, S7000 (2003), S9100 used to be!. After S100fs and S200EXR, FujiFilm seemed to take the path backwards. Now I no longer look at their offerings.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2011 at 07:23 UTC
Total: 86, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »