harrisoncac

harrisoncac

Lives in Canada Ontario, Canada
Works as a CNC Machinist
Joined on Jul 19, 2008

Comments

Total: 89, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Leica Announces V-Lux 3 superzoom article (131 comments in total)

So how much will this camera be sold?

Panasonic FZ-150 was at USD330 on Black Friday.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2011 at 20:17 UTC as 21st comment
On Leica Announces V-Lux 3 superzoom article (131 comments in total)

Buying this camera is just like adopting a kid for those who don't bear.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2011 at 19:00 UTC as 26th comment | 1 reply

What is this camera? Most stupid and retarded design. Garbage.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2011 at 05:41 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm releases X-S1 premium EXR 26X superzoom article (383 comments in total)

Impressive camera. But the lens exterior design looks disgusting. The lens appears like a tilted barrel. You know we hate barrel anything on a lens. Not slim or good looking. Maybe the designer is just too much overweighted.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 24, 2011 at 06:55 UTC as 122nd comment
On Preview:panasonicdmcgx1 (318 comments in total)

Until Panasonic gets rid of that tumor shaped grip, I am not going to buy it.
Another failed design.

Posted on Nov 7, 2011 at 07:54 UTC as 103rd comment | 1 reply
On Just Posted: Samsung NX200 Studio Comparison for JPEG article (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

magnumgf: Interesting. People are saying this is bad/terrible. What do those same people think of the Nikon V1 then? The Samsung stands head and shoulders above that thing...

Indeed. Anyone that wants a camera will first check the price, even those Nikon fanboys. Or Nikon just wants to use and rip off their fanboys.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 2, 2011 at 06:26 UTC
On GalleryItem:1510738 (1 comment in total)

Nice shot and beautiful model.

Posted on Oct 31, 2011 at 05:40 UTC as 1st comment

No matter what to don, you can not change the quirky characters of this cam.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 25, 2011 at 04:09 UTC as 20th comment
On Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V review article (71 comments in total)

No matter you like this review and the actual camera itself, B&H has now run out of stock of SONY HX100V.

Frustrated.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2011 at 04:37 UTC as 11th comment
On Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V review article (71 comments in total)

Dear DPR audience:
What do you say about HX100V against NIKON P500?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2011 at 06:09 UTC as 29th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

sfseng: When Sony announced 12 fps, 24mp, HD Autofocus video mode camera ppl said nah~we don't need that! but when Canon announced 12 fps 18mp camera, handofocus (manual focus) HD video mode camera with 5x price of Sony ppl said wow that's the monster! what a brand bias......

Because they have no brain.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 20, 2011 at 06:41 UTC
In reply to:

tkbslc: Looks pretty good, but let's remember this is a $750 lens on a $800 camera.

My goodness. $750 + $ 800 = ? $1550.00 !!
A SONY A77 or Canon 7D = $1400.00. A77 and 7D or Nikon's own D300s all are well below $1550. So why bother with this toy camera?
INSANE!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2011 at 05:26 UTC

INSANE!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 14, 2011 at 09:19 UTC as 28th comment
On Book review: 500 Poses for Photographing Women article (43 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: Oh great--irony--softcore books reviewed by dpreview.

jimread's view is correct. Or you are not able to memorize so many poses.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 10, 2011 at 22:55 UTC
In reply to:

aljudy: Somehow this is becoming a little insane. A fixed lens camera for $600 is a bargain! I must be in some other universe of camera owners... Al

Given the Olympus E-PL3 comes at CAD599.99 at retailer of Blacks Photography, I don't intend to pay 600 dollars for a fixed lens camera. And I have the choice of lot of lens choices to play with. The Panasonic G2 body is only at USD300.00.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2011 at 02:32 UTC
In reply to:

Theelderkeynes: A price of $500 over there they translate to £450 here, interesting given the pound at 1.55 dollars. Or is it just greed?

These cameras cost well below USD100.00.
Not only are the manufacturers insatiable, but the retailers are too.
I found that for anything that a retailer sells, they can sell it at 1/3 of their price and still makes money.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 5, 2011 at 15:22 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot S100 hands-on preview article (165 comments in total)

Stupid looking camera. Canon should buy a SONY camera and study it carefully. No characteristic camera, one after another.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2011 at 04:19 UTC as 8th comment | 2 replies
On Nikon 1 System First Impressions article (248 comments in total)

I think the very first people who buy these mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras are those who read and participate in this website other than compact updaters. 9 out 10 people who bought M4/3 or Nex's must have bought serious DSLR's. Those who are not interested in photography won't bother with these mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2011 at 07:57 UTC as 54th comment
On Nikon V1 and J1 - hands-on first impressions article (245 comments in total)
In reply to:

solsang: I think this could replace my lx5 for the very fast af alone, and better iq, have been waiting for this pixeldensity ever since the f31fd!

This fills the obvious lack between the m43 and compacts, why make a small body when you need bulky lenses?

Although the gf3 or ep mini with the 14-42 gx lens would make smaller combined size, the j1 and v1 could be competitors if the price is right

One camera type is missing: a big sensor, fixed zoom lens (for those who dont want to change lenses yet still want decent iq, the closest will be s100)

Agree. Unfortunately the price of the Nikon 1 isn't right, and it won't be any near competitor to M4/3 and NEX's.

I don't know why Sony didn't take their excellent R1 further. That camera has a large sensor and amazing Zeiss lens.

FujiFilm's bridge cameras were distinguish. How amazing their S5000Z, S7000 (2003), S9100 used to be!. After S100fs and S200EXR, FujiFilm seemed to take the path backwards. Now I no longer look at their offerings.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2011 at 07:23 UTC
On Nikon V1 and J1 - hands-on first impressions article (245 comments in total)
In reply to:

solsang: I think this could replace my lx5 for the very fast af alone, and better iq, have been waiting for this pixeldensity ever since the f31fd!

This fills the obvious lack between the m43 and compacts, why make a small body when you need bulky lenses?

Although the gf3 or ep mini with the 14-42 gx lens would make smaller combined size, the j1 and v1 could be competitors if the price is right

One camera type is missing: a big sensor, fixed zoom lens (for those who dont want to change lenses yet still want decent iq, the closest will be s100)

Agree. Unfortunately the price of the Nikon 1 isn't right, and it won't be any near competitor to M4/3 and NEX's.

I don't know why Sony didn't take their excellent R1 further. That camera has a large sensor and amazing Zeiss lens.

FujiFilm's bridge cameras were distinguish. How amazing their S5000Z, S7000 (2003), S9100 used to be!. After S100fs and S200EXR, FujiFilm seemed to take the path backwards. Now I no longer look at their offerings.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2011 at 07:23 UTC
Total: 89, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »