mimot13

Yes, DPP is better and faster as LR4/5.. (RAW), at zero cost. Of course LR do more in other aspects.
C1 too is much more better than LR and do the same !

Yes the "_" sign is for Adobe 1998 RGB. Without is sRGB. PS CS4 not able to read MkIII files : ok, CS4 doesn't offer the right release of ACR for MkIII APN, as well as it didn't work for a Nikon...

@Rudivan5 : you're right, color rendering of DxO and white balance is often a question to discuss about. Try to crop a picture and then compare with previous state just by clicking on image..! The...

yes they add new camera support.. BUT the main thing is possibility (new but still beta version) of importing LR catalogs under windows OS ! Previous release had already this feature under OS X...

DxO vs C1 : DxO is unbeatable concerning lens correction but image rendering is, IMHO, far from the one you can achieve with C1. C1 is also easier and faster to use, DxO (Pro version !) is...

@Marcin 3M : Phase One offer now a lower price for their software (-20% C1 Pro and 50% for C1 Express, upgrades and full version !). Fine, C1 is also better than LR, IMHO.

@Cipher & @JayEm Photos : ok, LR5 upgrade is not so much expensive.. but C1 (now with lower prices !!) is in most areas much more better than LR. Rendering is obviously better and I have to do less...

Sorry, but your comments are wrong.. on Sandisk page, the related speed are "read speed" NOT write speed..! Have a look on Rob Galbraith's page who has seriously compared almost all wellknown CF...

@Josh152 :Sorry, but your comments are wrong.. on Sandisk page, the related speed are "read speed" NOT write speed..! Have a look on Rob Galbraith's page who has seriously compared almost all...

@Josh152 :Sorry, but your comments are wrong.. on Sandisk page, the related speed are "read speed" NOT write speed..! Have a look on Rob Galbraith's page who has seriously compared almost all...

Hello, Iridient Digital is a very great RAW developper, simple, powerful and with an amazing photo render. Better and easier as many other good developpers. Runs only on MAC OS, without a huge...

I too own the 70-200 f2.8 VRII with TC2 III and combination works fine, indeed with some quality loss due to the TC.. but it will be interesting to see if this new 80-400 VRII is as good as one...

@doctorbza : your answer is really very funny (architecture/birds) but.. TRUE ! I've since a long time the curious impression that DxO stress mainly on lens corrections, details, resolution and...

@doctorbza : your answer is really very funny (architecture/birds) and interesting ! I've since a long time the curious impression that DxO stress mainly on lens corrections, details, resolution...

Same for me.. I don't know, except new users who doesn't have any 85, 70-200, 300mm aso.., who will buy this lens ? At this huge price ?! But it must of course related to the "supposed" quality..

Same for me.. I don't know, except new users who doesn't have any 85, 70-200, 300mm aso.., who will buy this lens ? At this huge price ?! But it must be of course related to the "supposed" lens...

No, no and no.. this 4.4RC is a pity. Have made some tests and compared to 4.3 release : ok, some little improvment in color area, actually not always visible, BUT what's sure is that images are...

I don't really know if this question has any sense..? Of course there will be a winner among the different cameras of this list. But I think, like many other users, that the different uses and...

I don't really know if this question has any sense..? Of course there will be a winner among the different cameras of this list. But I think, like many other users, that the different uses and...