ngc4565adam

Joined on Jul 24, 2011

Comments

Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8
On article Nikon unveils 24.1MP D5200 DSLR with optional Wi-Fi (392 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gothmoth: at least it will not cost an arm and a leg like canon latest cameras and lenses.....

You can't be fully sure about it.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 09:36 UTC
On article Nikon unveils 24.1MP D5200 DSLR with optional Wi-Fi (392 comments in total)

Some of the readers would say "yawn", but... 5fps shooting is great, 39 AF points is great, advanced metering is great. But... I really miss a second Fn button, and possibility of depth of field preview.

And: a software problem with D5100: when I try to shoot in camera HDR, I must to swith IQ to only JPG... and when I finishes with HDR, no auto return to RAW+JPG. It is really frustrating when I notice that I haven't saved RAW images after a busy photo session with some pictures of in camera HDR.

I guess it is not corrected yet.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 09:04 UTC as 93rd comment
On photo In the creek in the Taming the light challenge (1 comment in total)

Overly sharpened - but aside of that, really nice.

Link | Posted on May 13, 2012 at 13:54 UTC as 1st comment
On article Just Posted: Olympus OM-D E-M5 review (577 comments in total)

If I hadn't bought the Nikon D5100, this would have been my choice. Outer design is very appealing, and the image stabilizer is awesome along with the image quality.

Link | Posted on May 8, 2012 at 14:00 UTC as 11th comment
On article Just Posted: Nikon D4 Studio Test Samples (309 comments in total)
In reply to:

toomanycanons: My D5100 stayed with the big boys up to ISO 3200.

In two or maybe three weeks, I'm going for one. For a D5100. I love it even it's not in my hands yet.

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2012 at 23:17 UTC
On photo Garbage Astrophotography in nemesix's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Very nice ;)

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2012 at 09:26 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

Solarcoaster: What exactly is wrong with this camera? Not exactly groundbreaking but it seems comparable to some travel zoom compacts offered by other brands. The zoom range is ideal imo. Aperture is a little slow but the premium auto mode might be interesting. Overall it could be a decent competitor if it's priced right.

At the 'new age' of quasi-nano sized pixels, there are more noise in these pixels than photon, even at base ISO settings.
High speed and such extras cannot be enjoyed, while even ISO 200 pictures are detail-less smudges, I think.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2012 at 22:41 UTC
In reply to:

kevinschoenmakers: Casio, just give up already. This businessplan is dying.

With these specs, it would be far better:
- 8 megapixel
- sensor size like 10.4×7.8mm
- 8× optical zoom from 24mm eq. focus
- f/2,7-f/4,5 instead of f/3,0-f/5,9

These don't require much more bulk to accomplish, I think.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2012 at 22:34 UTC
Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8