Antonio Rojilla

Lives in Rwanda Rwanda
Joined on Mar 25, 2005

Comments

Total: 113, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Antonio Rojilla: So more or less a Sony NEX-3N clone with a worse sensor. Way to go Panasonic. The only thing they have is more lenses, but you know, most people buying this camera won't ever bother to put on it anything but the kit lens.

- M43 has more lenses...
- M43 has better lenses...
- The OM-D EM-5 is curently the best mirrorless...

But what has that to do with what I said?

At least Rob Sims can read...

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2013 at 20:13 UTC

So more or less a Sony NEX-3N clone with a worse sensor. Way to go Panasonic. The only thing they have is more lenses, but you know, most people buying this camera won't ever bother to put on it anything but the kit lens.

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2013 at 06:22 UTC as 30th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

tesch: No place to strap skis, board or snowshoes. People who design these outdoor packs need to go outside. There's more to being in the backcountry than carrying your camera gear. I'll pass!

People who post these comments need to read the articles.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2012 at 07:18 UTC
In reply to:

gl2k: Nice that Panny gives customers a feature that Canikon users already enjoy for many years now. LOL.

And Canon already went with radio control. Panny will offer this, and a powerful rugged weatherproofed flash, in 5 years. Luckily.

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2012 at 11:13 UTC

This is what I did just for fun (uncompleted, and I have less skills):

http://i.imgur.com/vff7Z.png

Yes, it's digital. Just without LCD and as mechanical as it could be made, with a hand-charged battery (that's why there are film advance and rewind levers, also to cock the shutter). The never-fails back-up or for those that like me love the convenience of digital (no darkroom needed) but miss the old beauties (FMs, OMs...).

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2012 at 14:25 UTC as 272nd comment
On article A Serious Rangefinder Compact Camera (137 comments in total)

This is what I did just for fun (uncompleted, and I have less skills):

http://i.imgur.com/vff7Z.png

Yes, it's digital. Just without LCD and as mechanical as it could be made, with a hand-charged battery (that's why there are film advance and rewind levers, also to cock the shutter). The never-fails back-up or for those that like me love the convenience of digital (no darkroom needed) but miss the old beauties (FMs, OMs...).

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2012 at 13:46 UTC as 54th comment
In reply to:

ManuelVilardeMacedo: Olyimpians, fear not: Sony is only interested in the medical business. Olympus will be no Minolta.
On the other hand, Olympus had a major quality leap when they started using sensors made by Sony. Not really a bad deal, actually...

Olympus will be Pentax.

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2012 at 20:31 UTC
On article Accessory Review: Tamrac Zipshot Tripod (94 comments in total)
In reply to:

Karl Gnter Wnsch: The fixed length of the legs make setting up that wannabee tripod (it's none by my book) impossible on terrain that's not perfectly flat. Even the slightest angle of the ground would make me fear for the stability of the rig... Why do you give this a rating of 4 stars when really it deserves one at maximum? Because as far as tripods are concerned you're probably better off without - at least then you won't have to deal with the rig toppling and destroying your gear in the process...

If it has three legs, then yes, it's a tripod.

I agree on the limitations but this tripod is better than no tripod when you need a tripod, so I believe it deserves more than the one start that you suggest.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2012 at 10:46 UTC
On article Hasselblad responds to Lunar criticisms (613 comments in total)

If they are after collectors or wealthy people at least they could have take the guts of the NEX-7 and put them in a mini 500c replica, of simple lines, square, with the LCD on top like a folding waist level viewfinder, with a fake film back where you could put an extra battery or keep a small flash or some memory cards... It would be a real homage and not just using a great name like Lunar for the sake of it. That's something I would be interested in even if I couldn't afford.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 08:51 UTC as 169th comment
On article Hasselblad responds to Lunar criticisms (613 comments in total)

Don't miss this!

http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/product-announcement-lensrentals-looney

LOL! :D

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 22:39 UTC as 248th comment | 1 reply
On article Hasselblad responds to Lunar criticisms (613 comments in total)

Whenever I heard or read the name Hasselblad I automatically thought of the 500s, the 200s, the Flexbody, the XPan... Of great studios and respected photographers... Of astronauts in the moon... And now they have almost ruined all those memories. What has been seen cannot been unseen.

At least they made me laugh.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 21:06 UTC as 277th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Antonio Rojilla: This is like if Lamborghini took a Volkswagen New Beetle and came with this:

http://i.imgur.com/7U1gH.jpg

And then they want to charge you five times more.

@Boerseuntije You must be the soul of any party.

Oh, I see by your comments that you actually LIKE this monstrosity. :baffled:

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 20:41 UTC

This is like if Lamborghini took a Volkswagen New Beetle and came with this:

http://i.imgur.com/7U1gH.jpg

And then they want to charge you five times more.

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 19:47 UTC as 265th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Domolo: Really.
Hassy, who do you think we are?
Idiots?

Apparently it works for Lecia (think re-styled Panasonics).

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 14:15 UTC
On article Photokina 2012: Leica Stand Report (15 comments in total)
In reply to:

sadwitch: The quality of both the RX100 and E-PL5 is simply amazing.

Two of the best Leicas ever.

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 14:01 UTC
In reply to:

JackM: I don't get it, why don't they just keep selling the M9, but at a discount?

Because now collectors have another model to, well, collect.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 21:51 UTC
In reply to:

Antonio Rojilla: Between the Sony EX100 (mainly for the sensor) and the Fuji XF1 (partly for the sensor, partly for the host of features and the nice design in a smaller package) this camera is DOA.

@NotTarts First, you already own a ZX-1 so you are going to defend the XZ-2 no matter what. I respect your decision but you don't need to trow us you post-purchase rationalization.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-purchase_rationalization

Second, what do try to prove with a close-up shot?

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 14:57 UTC
In reply to:

Antonio Rojilla: Between the Sony EX100 (mainly for the sensor) and the Fuji XF1 (partly for the sensor, partly for the host of features and the nice design in a smaller package) this camera is DOA.

@NotTards It's sad that that's the only thing the Olympus can be proud of.

@logbi77 You are right. I wish companies were more creative with names... It seems this is the year of the X: RX this, RX that, G1X, GX1 (!), XF, XE, XZ...

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 11:47 UTC

Between the Sony EX100 (mainly for the sensor) and the Fuji XF1 (partly for the sensor, partly for the host of features and the nice design in a smaller package) this camera is DOA.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 10:32 UTC as 37th comment | 7 replies
On article Just Posted: Sony NEX-6 and 16-50mm power zoom preview (63 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jokica: Anyone remembers Canon EOS M now? Nikon 1?

Hey, no offense at all! :) And I actually agree with you and find the Canon and Nikon mirrorless systems of little interest. They are great, sure, but right now personally hard to justify against m43 and NEX (specially with the new lenses, I really like the 10-18!).

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2012 at 15:30 UTC
Total: 113, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »