I'm sorry, but my 5DmkII with a prime lens is at least as sharp and has less noise. And I can shoot in color AND autofocus. If money wasn't an issue, this little camera might be fun - but the images it produces don't justify the price - and don't by a long shot. If this thing was $800, it might be fun.
Direct link |
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 03:10:53 UTC
as 1st comment
| 5 replies
I always liked Chuck. He's a great spokesman for Canon. I can see why the Japanese keep him around - he gives good answers without giving away any secrets.
Direct link |
Posted on Apr 20, 2012 at 01:00:49 UTC
as 47th comment
| 1 reply
I might just have to sell my old tyme EF 24-70 and pick this one up (if it's even the least bit sharp). I really need IS, and that new canon 24-70 is way too much.
Direct link |
Posted on Feb 18, 2012 at 05:09:00 UTC
as 6th comment
LA, United States
I'm sorry, but my 5DmkII with a prime lens is at least as sharp and has less noise. And I can shoot in color AND autofocus. If money wasn't an issue, this little camera might be fun - but the images it produces don't justify the price - and don't by a long shot. If this thing was $800, it might be fun.
I always liked Chuck. He's a great spokesman for Canon. I can see why the Japanese keep him around - he gives good answers without giving away any secrets.
At that price, their 70-200 must have a 5-stop image stabilizer, right?
I might just have to sell my old tyme EF 24-70 and pick this one up (if it's even the least bit sharp). I really need IS, and that new canon 24-70 is way too much.