well at least its something , for real though, this concept only really work well for a fix focal lens with a relatively mid range aperture and not moderate wide coverage and upward. The difficulty of making the sensor anything of more substantial size also mean it will be something of typical consumer DC only .. good for phone I guess but not really too inspiring.
There is more to just distortion that needed correction.
guest2015: crippled camera, crippled phone, has lte. makes no sense. android 5.0 lol
Well sure the CM1 is a good if not spectacular platform but that's becasue it fuse 2 much needed and wanted function into one, an Android Smartphone and a decent large sensor camera ( large when compared to typical DC and Smartphone ) Well CM10 is not that, again it get us back to needing to carry two instead of one , defeating the whole purpose of the concept .. I've tried the CM1, but am not really too impressed with the camera part ( Nikon 1 and Sony RX competing ) but its decent. So CM1 still stand as good one , what Panny should do is improve the build, and give us better Android sided integration / support. Its an only OK smartphone , a decent sensor ( without a proper camera app / UI that hobbyist can work with ), and CM10 kill the one significant advantage of it
while the bundle deal being the right idea, am not so much with the CM10 though. Now it revert back to the same old issue. Needing to carry the phone and the proper camera both when the CM1 is suppose to fuse the two in an agreeable manner. IMHO this defeat the purpose of it all, and if I want a proper large sensor camera to be ready, why not the Sony RX100s or even Panny's own recent TX1. Its not like you cannot connect your mobile device with these and perform the editing and sharing.
Ok so someone re-invent the flip phone , and just put a bigger camera and lens there and call it new !!
Would be a great platform for time lapse, it seems, can leave it in the open with continuous running capture say a shot every 5 minutes
at 24fps it will record two and a half minute, OK, I suppose Nikon's 3 Min 4K recording on the D5 is not so bad right ... LOL
why is there even a need for 2 version of the same lens .. ???
It would be most interesting to see real world field test on that sensor .. and I wonder if any new tech incorporated
ChrisH37: The lens is f2.8, meh.
And if it doesn't have an AF tracking system capable of tracking a dog in flight coming straight towards you, forgetaboutit.
Well we have action shoots before AF come along. Camera come in various form and usage, just blindly asking for feature isn't going to do any good
Franka T.L.: have to ask, what's the point .. there really is little sense for an SLT form factor lower mid range ( Hobbyist ) grade body , not making any sense for Sony .. wouldn't something like an updated A6000 really be better for all .. What Sony had been unable to do is to fix their own not so sweet attachment to the SLT architecture and reluctance to modernize the Alpha A mount.
Its quite clear now, the A mount really could benefit from the FF sensor now Sony have and the APS-C is best left for the E mount. Just as Nikon had tiers of FF bodies, so the same for Sony. The clear advantage of the A mount over the E mount form factor is literally the bulk and space allowed. I had said that before and will state it again , a new Sony A mount body without mirror box nor the SLT architecture would allow incorporating some thing more useful for hybrid body say ND filter array .
agree with the FF for A mount in like of a new A99-III ... but am not so sure about the SLT architecture. Do highend mirrorless doing AF having any problem, not seeing that really, Sony FS5/FS7, their A7 II series, Panny GH, and well Samsung NX1 .. Nikon and Canon had it both old and new, when doing Video , their body essentially a ( thick ) mirrorless. I sure do think A mount can be of value to the whole lineup. Especially on the more mid to high end. Am not so sure about the range from mid-low down.
have to ask, what's the point .. there really is little sense for an SLT form factor lower mid range ( Hobbyist ) grade body , not making any sense for Sony .. wouldn't something like an updated A6000 really be better for all .. What Sony had been unable to do is to fix their own not so sweet attachment to the SLT architecture and reluctance to modernize the Alpha A mount.
there are plenty others making imaging sensors, the consumer camera sensor business as a whole is only a very small portion of it
we've had this in Asia market for over a year already, hardly news at all .. FOV Go Pro not the first one who champion action camera, but its the first one who got it big, and with that come many who's already in there and many new comers. After all there really is little challenge in term of engineering to have such product.
brownie314: Why all the talk of Samsung ditching the camera business. As far as I can tell, this article only says they are taking one camera out of one regional market. Not sure how to get from a to f on that one.
as Samsung's own statement had put it, its all the camera and camcorders, not just a single one
well, I consider myself a steady hand but I do not think I am steady enough to the point that I can safely warrant shake free capture for a whole second or more. Practically I think this still demand some form of proper support if wanting to maximize the quality to the capture.
Basically its old school routine now combined and automated, which is not bad. It would still be a better one still if the crop is not there or at least not so severe and that RAW data could be captured
sounds like more a cost-effective and cost cutting measure to simplify and speed up any work needed between submission and delivery.
It does not actually made much sense in term of avoiding over processing post capture, as todays in camera jpeg are more geared towards processed for eye candy rather than preserving captures. RAW then developed data is more suited for that.
is this et. classiqueof product really viable any more. there need to be some reasonibg through and some re boot to this class of products and not just Sony.
seems like, sounds like, and likely, paranoia
yeah right, but Sony should just give the option to the user to use or not to use lossy compression. and the Q on hand is, can Sony fix this via firmware update and if they would do it, or if this is hard baked into the physical hardware