worldcup1982

worldcup1982

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Sep 21, 2010

Comments

Total: 31, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Misa: Very nice, I would buy if I could but I can not neither need to hate Leica because of my financial limitations I love those folks products.

Great reply. I agree. Its hilarious to see people bashing leica, but buying the same very lens brand on a panasonic camera...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 01:27 UTC
In reply to:

KonstantinosK: This must be the first time that buying the Leica instead of the Panasonic equivalent makes more sense.

@piratejabez , for me, brands like ricoh, pentax and leica that do NOT use proprietary raw format deserve my respect...no need for all the time software updates...making photographers lives easier...and i do not have lightroom, tempting for me...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 20:49 UTC
In reply to:

KonstantinosK: This must be the first time that buying the Leica instead of the Panasonic equivalent makes more sense.

...yep...DNG, 3 year warranty and lightroom...im with you

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 20:07 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (770 comments in total)

intercourse between x-e1 and lx7...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 18:37 UTC as 108th comment
In reply to:

worldcup1982: i want a 35mm lens on a mobile...wont happen, i know...

yep..thats what im thinking..some transparent tape to frame and voilá...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 18:21 UTC

i want a 35mm lens on a mobile...wont happen, i know...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 18:06 UTC as 86th comment | 2 replies
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (770 comments in total)

does it have the step zoom or some marking to know which focal lenght im using?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 16:33 UTC as 128th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (770 comments in total)
In reply to:

oluv: please make this lens available for m43 too!!!!

Yep...makes me wonder about buying or not the 12-35mm...for less i can get this camera....

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 12:49 UTC
On Sigma announces dp1 Quattro article (199 comments in total)

weird getting weirder...lol
but what matters is IQ..and this camera delivers at low iso...but with some color noise and blotching...and some color degradation too..as this comparison shows:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/54363856
the red, green on boats are pretty much ugky here..maybe the PP...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 13, 2014 at 21:18 UTC as 28th comment
In reply to:

worldcup1982: a solution for a non existing problem

Einstein and Sidney, i agree that it is a step up in IQ. Problem is, The vast majority wanting that can and will buy a camera, less cumbersome and much more practical. The main reason for a phone is: small, easy and connection. IQ isnt and will not be their forte. Ever. Nokia 1020 is a good solution IMO

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2014 at 21:38 UTC

a solution for a non existing problem

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2014 at 16:33 UTC as 73rd comment | 4 replies
On Fujifilm X30 First Impressions Review preview (363 comments in total)
In reply to:

worldcup1982: good luck trying to sell it at this price...nice cam, but at 600 usd? you got to be kidding

18 months ago is a long, long time...competition is improving...and we have to understand that, dispite our preferences, the market is the one who decides a success or a failure...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2014 at 16:55 UTC
On Fujifilm X30 First Impressions Review preview (363 comments in total)

good luck trying to sell it at this price...nice cam, but at 600 usd? you got to be kidding

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2014 at 11:09 UTC as 88th comment | 2 replies
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Review article (177 comments in total)

Raw comparison at f6.3 for the FZ200 and f3.5 for the FZ150? is that correct? if so, wouldnt that give a good advantage for the FZ150? in resolution terms? (less diffraction for the FZ150)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 17, 2012 at 01:48 UTC as 53rd comment | 6 replies
On blue comparison photo in ilsiu's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

this is something i dont understand...isnt the foveon sensor supposed to enlarge better than the bayer? i never got good large prints from my DP1s...maximum of 11X17...and even then not great...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2012 at 21:12 UTC as 1st comment

Question, is it possible to know which flenght you are using? thanks.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 12, 2012 at 01:16 UTC as 47th comment

Here comes the V2...with minor improvements, too bad...im into photos, not video....nikon, you will stay behind competition....mirrorless all over the place, and nikon worried about not hurting their APS-C sales....

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2012 at 12:04 UTC as 7th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

worldcup1982: please not with the crap panasonic sensor....

@micahmedia ..i understand that is better than the old ones. But panasonic can make better than that...its about 4 years developing sensors and very little improvement. i honestly dont care about high iso noise, as long they can at least give low iso DR on par with 2 years aps-c sensors...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2012 at 02:18 UTC

please not with the crap panasonic sensor....

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2012 at 01:59 UTC as 104th comment | 5 replies
On Preview:canong1x (1032 comments in total)
In reply to:

the mono eye: Personal opinion:
should have remove the optical view finder
should have wider lens
should have brighter lens
should have better battery life
should have the option of using filter + lens hood together

All in all is great improvement, but these downsides made me stand still and wait for the mirrorless from Canon instead (if any)

and give an optional evf...

Posted on Jan 11, 2012 at 02:02 UTC
Total: 31, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »