Rupert Bottomsworth

Rupert Bottomsworth

Joined on Mar 13, 2011

Comments

Total: 98, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Mike FL: "A closer look at Canon's forthcoming PowerShot G3X"?

Did you see the aperture # by looking closer?

Not closer enough?

"Until now the only specification which was confirmed is the camera's 24-600mm equivalent zoom."
You didn't look close enough at the article. ;)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2015 at 04:29 UTC
In reply to:

Eigenmeat: Waste of time, it's not like you can fit a DSLR into your pocket even WITHOUT a lens.

Instead, they should do something like the "first DSLR kit lense that starts at 24mm equivalent".

Please try to spell lens correctly.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2015 at 12:11 UTC
On Apple reveals Photos beta for developers post (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

Benarm: nicely dumbed down for the masses

No I didn't. I just thought what a tosser you sound like. :D

Direct link | Posted on Feb 9, 2015 at 11:02 UTC
On Apple reveals Photos beta for developers post (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

Benarm: nicely dumbed down for the masses

Benarm, did you feel superior when you wrote that?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 9, 2015 at 05:20 UTC
On Boing, boing in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (26 comments in total)

He's doing his best kangaroo impersonation :D

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2015 at 04:24 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
On Enthusiast interchangeable lens camera 2013 roundup article (467 comments in total)
In reply to:

Lanidrac: There is never nothing interesting to read here at DPR.

So are you saying there is always something interesting to read here at DPR?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 30, 2014 at 05:18 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Review preview (897 comments in total)

I don't understand why they've said the lens zoom range is a con/negative. What do they expect? A 7-300mm f/0.95 at this size?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 23, 2014 at 09:36 UTC as 64th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

SeeRoy: "...high-end goods designed to appeal to the five senses..."
Sic.

Go on, have a good lick.. you know you want to ;)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 9, 2014 at 02:28 UTC

Will they have specific series of bags for each mirrorless system?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2014 at 10:03 UTC as 11th comment
On Price released for Brikk's 24k gold Nikon Df article (390 comments in total)

One word; why?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 31, 2014 at 11:20 UTC as 103rd comment
In reply to:

RunStrom: Would have been nicer with a higher speck camera.

Yes, because let's face it, photography is all about being trendy.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 30, 2014 at 09:28 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2702 comments in total)
In reply to:

Isoruku: 910 grams??! Might as well get a D750.

What if you want 10 fps though?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 13:55 UTC

Just how good a quality can a 30x lens this size be?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 4, 2014 at 08:19 UTC as 41st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

ThePhilips: MFD (min focusing distance) of 45cm? Ouch.

One of the reason I went with the m43 was that the Oly lenses have relatively short MFD. Helps enormously in tight corners and on social outings.

Just buy a macro lens if you want to shoot that close.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2014 at 01:26 UTC
On Travel tripods: Comparing 5 aluminum kits article (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

Felix E Klee: For today's light weight compacts and system cameras, wouldn't it be possible to create an advanced tripod that just weighs about a pound / 0.5 kg, and that is extensible to a variable height of up to 5 foot / 1.5 m? No market?

Bilora used to make the Biloret, which comes close, and which can be had cheap. However its technology is roughly half a century old. I'm willing to pay up to 200 USD / EUR for a tripod matching the above specs. Of course light weight tripods are not great in wind, but it's not always windy.

Carbon is an incredible material. I used very thin carbon legs for a fun table tripod design: http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:363348

I have the Sirui T-025x, a carbon fibre tripod that weighs in at .6kg, which sounds like what you're after.

http://www.sirui.com.sg/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=74:t-005025-series&catid=83&Itemid=470

Direct link | Posted on Jul 20, 2014 at 09:02 UTC

Gimmicky and ultimately uninteresting.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2014 at 10:55 UTC as 47th comment
In reply to:

vscd: Interesting, but it has no real advantage because you just use an old lense on your NEX. Maybe a Tilt/Shift Cam can give you some new possibilities.

It's lens, not lens.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2014 at 11:56 UTC

Actor Dennis Hopper gets first London exhibition - 4 years after death

What bad taste this title is. They guy has been dead for 4 years, for god's sake!
It should be: The Hopper Art Trust is showing an exhibition of the late Dennis Hopper's photos.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2014 at 06:12 UTC as 11th comment | 3 replies
On A GoPro Hero's journey into a dishwasher article (167 comments in total)

ZZZZzzzz…..

Direct link | Posted on Jun 5, 2014 at 14:00 UTC as 56th comment
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2962 comments in total)
In reply to:

Menneisyys: At least we know the following: if (and only if) production RX100's have exactly the same optical and electronic quality,

- at the long end of the zoom, the lens can't resolve 20 Mpixel but has pretty good corners
- the sensor seems to be a bit noisier than that of the RX100 MkII
- the WB isn't exactly fool-proof

Also, based on the a CameraStore "review",
- the 720p120 slow-mo video mode only has 360p120 effective resolution- but at least doesn't have aliasing, unlike, say, the Samsung Note 3
- IS in video mode seems to be rather cr@ppy (assuming it wasn't an operator error)

I REALLY hope the lens is significantly better at shorter FoV's. After all, many compact zoom lens (e.g., the Pana 12-32) deliver the worst results at their longest focal length. I *really* hope the case is the same with the new Sony (and the corners at 24mm equiv aren't messy and at least are on par with the above-mentioned 12-32).

Hey, why don't you post this a third time, just to be sure. You never know, some people might miss it.

Direct link | Posted on May 30, 2014 at 13:45 UTC
Total: 98, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »