EthanX

Lives in Israel Israel
Joined on Aug 5, 2003

Comments

Total: 32, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Opinion - Erez Marom: Whatever it Doesn't Take (191 comments in total)
In reply to:

hesbehindyou: Anyone else read this and think it was kinda... obvious?

Well... Yes. At first.
But the amount of debating below hints it probably isn't after all.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2015 at 23:05 UTC
On article Opinion - Erez Marom: Whatever it Doesn't Take (191 comments in total)

Got that idea right...
Plus, I'm mesmerized with your photos.

Good job!

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2015 at 21:25 UTC as 25th comment
On article Go wide! Hands-on with Canon's 11-24mm F4 L (229 comments in total)
In reply to:

ManuelVilardeMacedo: Why on earth does a camera review (Canon 5D R) get ten times more comments than a lens' review? Bodies come and go, lenses stay (even more so in this digital age); that's why lenses are the heart of a phogorphic system. It should be the other way round, but I guess cameras have more gizmos and fancy figures... oh well.

What's there to read about a lens?
A lens is a lens. you snap it to your camera and take photos.

Ok, it's quiet, it's fast, it's reliable...
That's all there is to say.

With a camera - you can easily fill 20 pages!

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2015 at 21:09 UTC
On article Canon introduces new $78K 50-1000mm cine lens (175 comments in total)

Why would anyone buy this and not 2 or 3 separate full frame cameras - each attached to a lens covering part of that 50-1000 range?

Camera's weight when actually taking the photo is also a point to consider...

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2014 at 08:25 UTC as 19th comment | 2 replies
On article Canon introduces new $78K 50-1000mm cine lens (175 comments in total)
In reply to:

alegator1: Is this lens fit for a selfie?

I'm doubted if you can hold it against your body when the camera is on the other side... :)

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2014 at 08:18 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Review (490 comments in total)
In reply to:

tom1234567: As far as I know the Samsung is not out until the middle of November
as they were working on a new Firmware,
beats me how someone can condemn a camera before its even out!!!!

and Samsung engineers say they are working on firmware,

some people just like to rubbish cameras they troll here quiet often,

post your photos then let us ALL see,
put a video on YouTube, show us all the poor focus, poor video,
does the GH4 not need a docking station for the 4k video
The Samsung does not I wonder why, is it just Panasonic trying to get more monies out of the users
Tom G

It wasn't the same guy you were replying to...

Link | Posted on Oct 16, 2014 at 17:39 UTC
On article Relonch brings APS-C image sensor to the iPhone (41 comments in total)

1MP is so... 1993!

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 06:25 UTC as 6th comment
On Connect post Relonch brings APS-C image sensor to the iPhone (41 comments in total)

1MP is so... 1993!

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 06:25 UTC as 6th comment
On article Hands-on with the Pentax K-S1 (349 comments in total)

Hey, all you know about the price is the MSRP, since when is this a criteria for anything?

Just wait a few months and check the street price then.
My guess? 20% less. At least.

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2014 at 20:37 UTC as 25th comment
On article 1939: England in Color (part 3) (90 comments in total)

And once again, thank you!

What amazes me most is the way things looked like with the absence of cars everywhere.
The world used to be a much nicer place, back then...

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2014 at 20:24 UTC as 9th comment | 2 replies
On article 1939: England in Color (part 2) (177 comments in total)
In reply to:

EthanX: Amazing how all those building from scene #4 (like the Burton/Allton building and the stripe in its middle) stayed just as they were about 75 years ago. The telephone booth is the only thing that's missing, and if it weren't for cellphones, I guess it would still be standing there.

Brilliant!

Now finished looking at all of them.
Many thanks for sharing, they're brilliant!

Link | Posted on May 3, 2014 at 12:28 UTC
On article 1939: England in Color (part 2) (177 comments in total)

Amazing how all those building from scene #4 (like the Burton/Allton building and the stripe in its middle) stayed just as they were about 75 years ago. The telephone booth is the only thing that's missing, and if it weren't for cellphones, I guess it would still be standing there.

Brilliant!

Link | Posted on May 3, 2014 at 12:12 UTC as 117th comment | 1 reply
On article Pentax K-3 Review (522 comments in total)

Hey, is it just me or have many new samples recently been added to the review, including some excellent low light images (e.g. those of the cat)?

I'm pretty sure I haven't seen them before...

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2014 at 17:57 UTC as 44th comment
On article Windows XP is dead. Long live Windows XP 'Bliss' (119 comments in total)
In reply to:

EthanX: Funny. Given the relatively low resolution (1024x768, if I'm not mistaken) this photo had on the XP installation disk, I always thought it was some sort of digital artwork.

Mamiya RZ67 medium format?! (!!!)?

I wish I could see a high resolution version of this photo. It should be wonderful.

Wow man, thanks for that.

I have to tell you, I find your version ever prettier than the original one. Good shot!

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2014 at 06:40 UTC
On article Windows XP is dead. Long live Windows XP 'Bliss' (119 comments in total)
In reply to:

photosen: Cool video, I always assumed it was a photoshop image. Windows' BSOD has been seen way more times though.

HowaboutRAW - Micro$oft has a reputation for releasing one or two good OS, then one 'problematic' OS. It's been going on for too long for me to believe it's just a coincidence...

But this means that we'd probably get something good after 8 :)

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2014 at 06:34 UTC
On article Hands on with the Pentax 645Z (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

Frank_BR: 1550g body only?!
I bet only prism and mirror mechanism weigh half that.
If Ricoh wanted to launch a new camera, it should be a MF mirrorless, as Sony will do in the coming months.

The only justification for the 645Z is it will help to reduce a bit the inferiority complex of many fans of the Pentax brand, which never had a FF DSLR on the market. Now, Pentax fanboys can say to Nikon and Canon fanboys:

- "Mine" is bigger than yours.

A mirrorless Medium Format camera would need a whole new set of lenses.
This baby has backward compatibility with all the existing 645 lens. That's why.

"the 645Z is it will help to reduce a bit the inferiority..."
...Enough with the nonsense, 'k? This is a MF camera. It's not just bigger, it's also better.

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 23:33 UTC
On article Hands on with the Pentax 645Z (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

DPNick: "order of magnitude"
LOL!

You shouldn't feel embarrassed, IMHO. It appears that some people just can't appreciate a long, detailed article, but instead they have to find some minor details to pick on. Shame for them.

Personally I do think that 8500 is in order of magnitude less than 29000, especially when expressing the number of dollars required for buying a camera.

Thanks for the Hands-On, I enjoyed it.

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 23:24 UTC
On article Hands on with the Pentax 645Z (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

falconeyes: This will become the camera with best image quality ever made up to today!

(in terms of DxOMark, it should score around 105 Overall Score and 50MP, even though the jump from 35mm is small (0.79 crop)).

I hope that Ricoh releases the marketing money needed to make this a bold statement for Pentax being overall leader in IQ. The brand needs a bit of hype to make a come back, esp. in the US.

Until now, MF cameras didn't have particularly high maximum ISO's.

I wonder what photos with ISO of 204800 would look like with the 645Z - I believe they would really open new doors for anyone shooting at night!

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 12:52 UTC
On article Ricoh announces medium-format Pentax 645Z (161 comments in total)

DPR, I believe you have a mistake in the specs sheet - "Articulated LCD" says "No", and I believe it has one.

Looks like one amazing camera, btw. I think it's a really significant leap ahead in terms of usability for MF cameras.

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 12:44 UTC as 20th comment
On article Hands on with the Pentax 645Z (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

phoenix15: Most obviously, no Ricoh badge on the back that was complained by hardcore pentaxians. If one read K-3 review in page 4, DPR even wrote: "The real changes are on the back, and we're not talking about the 'Ricoh' logo on the K-3." :)

Apparently, Ricoh do listen to the fans. This 645z is truly a winner in MP league.And maybe pro FF shooter will give some credit to this machine. I am curious to see the image quality compared to Nikon D4s or Nikon D800e, or Canon 1DX.

Hope DPR will review it faster than what they did to Pentax K-3

It's a MF camera. IQ should be in a different league, compared to what the 1DX or D800e etc. can provide...

But you don't have to wait much too see that - just google up and find some samples frpm the 645D. I guess the Z is even better (even if that's hard to believe, the D is close to perfect IMHO).

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 12:35 UTC
Total: 32, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »