John, some pretty 20 year old woman living on a 2nd floor apartment may not be _that_ boring after all...
Plus I don't think she'd be able to hear this tiny drone when she's in the shower - are you sure that any security cameras already exist in this kind of places as well?
Direct link |
Posted on Jan 26, 2013 at 14:34:40 UTC
Am I the only one wondering why DPReview has chosen to make a preview and not a full review for this lens?
I mean - They've done a real good job for a preview, but unlike camera reviews, the reviews for lens are usually only 4-5 pages anyway. So what's the overhead in running this one test that will give us their famous widget results and make this a proper *review*? Another single day of work?
Come on, DPReview - we trust you! I just wanna know how good this lens performs...
Direct link |
Posted on Nov 15, 2012 at 10:53:05 UTC
as 10th comment
Snaaks: get a life. seriously
John, some pretty 20 year old woman living on a 2nd floor apartment may not be _that_ boring after all...
Plus I don't think she'd be able to hear this tiny drone when she's in the shower - are you sure that any security cameras already exist in this kind of places as well?
Am I the only one wondering why DPReview has chosen to make a preview and not a full review for this lens?
I mean - They've done a real good job for a preview, but unlike camera reviews, the reviews for lens are usually only 4-5 pages anyway. So what's the overhead in running this one test that will give us their famous widget results and make this a proper *review*? Another single day of work?
Come on, DPReview - we trust you!
I just wanna know how good this lens performs...
wy2lam: don't get it - why does firmware need to be upgraded in order to support a new lens?
I don't *know*, but I can guess it might be for adding parameters for a lens correction function, if the 5D has this feature.