Sonnik

Sonnik

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jul 25, 2010

Comments

Total: 32, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Olympus debuts 'Anywhere Classroom' video series article (43 comments in total)

At the end of the video, when she's giving us the web address, she says "back slash". Sorry, but that is a "forward slash". Little details done wrong, degrade confidence.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2014 at 01:36 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

XeroJay: Jeez, with results this awful, why bother? Looks like smartphones won't be replacing my 85L anytime soon.

That is such a lame reply!! How is getting an awful image justified by a lighter weight?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 10, 2014 at 14:37 UTC
On Homemade rig captures extreme macro shots of snowflakes article (186 comments in total)
In reply to:

Lea5: It's the little things where you can see god's art at best.

MarkByland, why would you dismiss daddyo's comment and not allow for the possibility that math was also created by God?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 2, 2013 at 16:52 UTC
On Canola Fields in the My best picture this week challenge (13 comments in total)

Looks like the sky was added in to replace maybe a dull, gray sky. Look at the edges of the field where they come in contact with the sky.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 12, 2013 at 06:08 UTC as 10th comment | 2 replies
On Nikon D610 preview (634 comments in total)
In reply to:

Griffo 155: Frankly I'm disappointed. No D400 coming soon then?
I know the D610 is an upgrade but Nikon could of added a little more...
Wifi maybe?
I keep saying this Nikon are losing the plot.

Don't go the Blackberry way Nikon!

The correct English grammar is: "could've" NOT "could of"!! People who read your comment might get the wrong idea about your intelligence!!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 10, 2013 at 13:27 UTC
On baby swallows in the Birding (No BIF) challenge (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

Arijit Banerjee: Photographing chicks is totally against birding ethics. I am not voting on this.

That is the most rediculous statement I've EVER heard!!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 23, 2013 at 14:26 UTC
In reply to:

TLD: I've lusted over the 24 inch Cintiq Touch since it came out, but it is a lot more money than the non touch version, and is so big it would take over your desk space leaving no room for a couple of large monitors. So I am interested in this device because it is a) affordable, and b) could occupy the same desk space as my Intuos 4.

But AFAICT this is NOT a Touch device, so I doubt I'll bother. There will probably be a Touch version down the road, but if the 24 inch Cintiq is anything to go by, a 13 inch Cintiq Touch would cost half as much again, be too much money for what it is and does.

Now if someone can tell me that I missed the Touch feature in 'this' version, I am definitely interested.

It says it right in the 1st paragraph: "Combined with the company's latest Pro Pen the Cintiq 13HD offers 2048 levels of pressure sensitivity for graphic design and retouching."!!! Unless by "touch", you meant finger touch, but why would that be important for retouching and drawing? The pressure-sensitive pen is what you use for that!!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 23, 2013 at 14:06 UTC
On Singular Astronomical Conjunction in the Tricks & Treats challenge (3 comments in total)

Moon god!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2013 at 05:17 UTC as 1st comment
On Singular Astronomical Conjunction in the Tricks & Treats challenge (3 comments in total)

Moon god!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2013 at 05:09 UTC as 2nd comment
On Three colors on a blue in the Smoke trails and contrails challenge (5 comments in total)

I'm just curious. Why are the three top planes' smoke trails blue (right out of the airplanes), but green beyond? Clearer when viewed at the original uploaded resolution.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 14, 2013 at 01:39 UTC as 1st comment
On Jessica A. in the High Contrast Portraits challenge (6 comments in total)

Sorry, I might've rushed to judgment. You are right! But the image is very "soft", which originally led me to my conclusion.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 23, 2012 at 16:02 UTC as 1st comment
On lovers meet in the Meet challenge (3 comments in total)

Nice!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 16, 2012 at 19:28 UTC as 3rd comment
On Chandelier inside the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque in the Chandeliers challenge (4 comments in total)

Religion of PEACE!!!!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 16, 2012 at 19:25 UTC as 3rd comment
On Monocle in the The Photographer Photographed challenge (6 comments in total)

You neglected to offset the image of the eye to account for the thickness of the camera!! Even though the shot is head on, I think you need a bit of an offset. Right now it looks very obvious that two shots were taken (one of the face alone & one with the camera) and that the LCD was erased to reveal the eye on the layer below.

Then you have the technical aspect that the image of the eye on the LCD would be very dark due to the lack of light between the camera and the eye. So you coul've made it a bit darker to be more realistic.

Sorry, but these realities take away from the intended artistic idea.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 16, 2012 at 19:17 UTC as 1st comment
On ... And Ere Long... in the O Holy Night challenge (3 comments in total)

You're a jerk, mocking the Holy Night when Jesus Christ was born! If you don't insult you won't be insulted!!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2012 at 20:26 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On Crescent Moon in the O Holy Night challenge (1 comment in total)

Away with you and your allah god of the crescent moon!! Oh Holy Night (especially this time of year) refers to Jesus Christ's Birth on Christmas day!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2012 at 20:21 UTC as 1st comment
On Charlie (pink phone not shown) in the Blondes Portrait challenge (2 comments in total)

Looking at the whites of the eyes and pupils (viewed at 100%), this IS BY FAR one of the worst Photoshop OVERprocessing I've seen!!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 25, 2012 at 05:09 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On Photokina 2012: Hasselblad Stand Report article (47 comments in total)
In reply to:

maniax: rare woods, crocodile skin .... Even if I wanted to buy this sony copy i would feel bad about the materials they used.

Why would you feel bad? Man has been using beautiful wood creations since the dawn of time. For God's sake, set yourself free from the brain-washing you got in the Marxist school system! Personally, I don't like wood or animal skin on a camera, but not for the same reasons you have. Why would I say that I'd feel bad about the materials they used??

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2012 at 03:19 UTC
On Beauty in the Sensuality ... At a Glance. challenge (3 comments in total)

OMG. So beautiful, I can't breathe!!!!!!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2012 at 05:41 UTC as 1st comment
On Beauty in the Sensuality ... At a Glance. challenge (3 comments in total)

Oh yeah, the definition of beauty!!!!!!!!!!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 1, 2012 at 05:00 UTC as 2nd comment
Total: 32, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »