Couscousdelight

Couscousdelight

Lives in France France
Works as a Computer Graphics
Has a website at http://www.labellelumiere.fr
Joined on Nov 9, 2010

Comments

Total: 250, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Medium well done: Two takes on the Pentax 645Z article (245 comments in total)
In reply to:

riman: Eight thousand dollars for this??!! I have some prime land in Florida I would like to sell you...right next to the Everglades..
You say Nikon is not afraid of this.. I own a D 750 and neither am I..

Hate to be rude but I have to keep it real, bro. Nothing here to rave about..

just a guy wiyh eyes ?
You mean bad eyes ?

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=pentax_645z&attr13_1=nikon_d810&attr13_2=canon_eos5dmkiii&attr13_3=nikon_d750&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=100&attr16_1=100&attr16_2=100&attr16_3=100&normalization=full&widget=1&x=-0.05157816005983536&y=0.262676327569144

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2014 at 09:33 UTC
On Medium well done: Two takes on the Pentax 645Z article (245 comments in total)

Ming Thein have published a article about his experience with the 645Z, 6 months after.
http://blog.mingthein.com/2014/12/10/pentax-645z-six-months/
Sure, he's not a hispter with a camera, he knows how to use it, even for urbex :)

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2014 at 09:08 UTC as 25th comment
On White Cockatoo in Silky Oak Tree photo in emem's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Lovely shot, welll done.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2014 at 20:19 UTC as 1st comment
On Sony Alpha 7 II real-world sample gallery posted article (244 comments in total)
In reply to:

RadPhoto: Does anyone know if the shutter sound still LOUD? I have an NEX5n and I just hate the loud shutter sound. Why would a mirrorless camera have a loud shutter sound?

Maybe we should ask nicely to the tester. :)
So, how is the shutter sound, please ?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 6, 2014 at 19:51 UTC

For Pentax, it was more than a rumor, it was in a interview from pentaxforum.com, where the Pentaxrep agree than they are looking for that technology.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 12:26 UTC as 50th comment

They are some rumors about Pentax doing the same.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 06:39 UTC as 67th comment
On The misty church in the November Sky challenge (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

MenM: such a beauty

Thank you MenM. Apparently, the ones who rate it at 05 or 1 don't think the same :)

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 06:18 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2701 comments in total)
In reply to:

andymuns: All i can say is have look at this.... http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-7D-Mark-II-versus-Pentax-K-3-versus-Nikon-D7100___977_914_865
A $1800 camera should have a better sensor then Canon Eos 7d Mark II has...

Yeah, of course, there is a conspiracy to demote Canon sensors.
And if another sensor evaluation site make the same statement about Canon sensors, i guess they are in the conspiracy too...
http://www.senscore.org/

Direct link | Posted on Nov 21, 2014 at 05:32 UTC

Great a new Lolca camera !
This is hilarious, a 400$ Pentax K50, aOly or Pana 4/3 gives better results.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=leica_x113&attr13_1=panasonic_dmcgh4&attr13_2=pentax_k500&attr13_3=oly_em5&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=100&attr16_1=100&attr16_2=100&attr16_3=200&normalization=full&widget=1&x=0.315923566878981&y=0.8106842488487445

Direct link | Posted on Nov 13, 2014 at 07:55 UTC as 33rd comment
In reply to:

Everlast66: I think it is laughable to call anything associated with the M4/3 system "PRO"!!

Surely there would be one or two enthusiasts, but no normal professional will rely on a M4/3 sensor for their professional work.

I've never heard any of these names, sorry.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 3, 2014 at 08:31 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2701 comments in total)

Error - To delete

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2014 at 05:12 UTC as 169th comment
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1658 comments in total)

Many thanks to the Canon marketing team for the good laugh of the day.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 13:06 UTC as 466th comment | 2 replies
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1658 comments in total)
In reply to:

Segaman: Countdown to read trollers hating canon.
Gee, you guys spreads wrong infos all over the net, I wonder why.
If your camera is a lot better, why dont you guys go shoot some pics, instead of wasting your time and our time with your negative views.
I am glad I dont have to you guys in the forum I go daily, really sad

Well, sorry for you, but this is a Epic Fail from Canon...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 13:03 UTC
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1658 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sdaniella: user programmable pixel level multi-iso (multi-gain) full res color zone-system full frame Ultra-HDR (DR 22+ EV) stills (video) real time capture FF 40mp+ (adjustable + previewable LIVE with Canon Final Image Simulation) with IQ with clean finest detail and 'no noise' (NR that doesn't distort details) in extreme lowest light (below 0.01 lux) dual-pixel PDAF (full-frame) ... and throw in global shutter, too ... (sensor that runs much cooler than any todate; DiG!C #?) ... and up to 240fps+ (intended for HDR flexibility) ... H.265 for video 4k/8k and 2k/1080p ... and ... tri-mode evf-ovf hybrid VF with a top hinged modular VASS (vari-angle swivel screen) ... touch screen wifi remote ...

(\ /)
( o.o) ---( hehehehe ... )
o(")(")

as for medium format ... they'd have to create a whole bunch of EOS E-MF lenses ... unlikely (not impossible)

lol...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 12:55 UTC

Well, i'm not very excited about these.

check the texture of the bricks on the right pillar : watercolor fest !
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/photos/3038710/28_iso200_p1000166?inalbum=panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx100-samples-gallery
And this is a 200 iso shot in daylight...

I hoe this is just a internal jpg default, and than RAW gives better results.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 4, 2014 at 06:39 UTC as 154th comment
On 7DII_beta_ISO100_030A9603 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)
In reply to:

Couscousdelight: Where are the details ? It's all overexposed...
Why using a +1 exposure compensation ?

Thank you for the answer. But i dont' understand why a hasch direct light requires a +1 exposure compensation.

Regards.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 3, 2014 at 05:50 UTC
On 7DII_beta_ISO250_030A9526 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

This is pretty soft, maybe a effect of the diffraction at F14 ?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 30, 2014 at 07:47 UTC as 1st comment | 2 replies
On 7DII_beta_ISO100_030A9603 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

Where are the details ? It's all overexposed...
Why using a +1 exposure compensation ?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 30, 2014 at 07:44 UTC as 1st comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Pallke: Nice camera, nothing special.

But: in 5 years from 18MP to 20MP... hmmmm WOW!

"Good. They have realise that is practical maximum for APSC."
You mean the maximum for the canon sensor's tech ?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 05:03 UTC
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: Which is better? This or Nikon D7100?

Which is better? This or Nikon D7100?

Pentax K-3

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 04:57 UTC
Total: 250, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »