Couscousdelight

Couscousdelight

Lives in France France
Works as a Computer Graphics
Has a website at http://www.labellelumiere.fr
Joined on Nov 9, 2010

Comments

Total: 213, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Ergo607: This is typical: one camera who is almost one year old gets a major update with significant improvement and a lot of news features and three camera's that are end of life get a firmware update too (name one manufacturer that has done the same in the past!) and all people do is moan...

Pentax, with diffraction correction added to the K3.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 19, 2014 at 10:50 UTC
In reply to:

Paul Guba: Comparing two cameras with similar sensors is like comparing two cars with V8 engines. The 645Z and the Alpa are two completely different machines. I won't justify the huge price difference but at the same time you can't compare the two as tools. Phase also has better software and years of experience getting the best data from a sensor. There both great cameras but the similarity ends at MP.

I'm a hasselblad (553 ELX with 80mm t* Zeiss lens) and Pentax user, and seriously, Pentax lenses are at least as good as their Zeiss counterparts.
And they are cheaper, weather sealed, sometimes stabilized and with AF, so please, stop that bs about Pebtax lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2014 at 09:17 UTC
On Medium well done: Two takes on the Pentax 645Z article (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

riman: Eight thousand dollars for this??!! I have some prime land in Florida I would like to sell you...right next to the Everglades..
You say Nikon is not afraid of this.. I own a D 750 and neither am I..

Hate to be rude but I have to keep it real, bro. Nothing here to rave about..

Well, yes.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2014 at 15:34 UTC
On Medium well done: Two takes on the Pentax 645Z article (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

riman: Eight thousand dollars for this??!! I have some prime land in Florida I would like to sell you...right next to the Everglades..
You say Nikon is not afraid of this.. I own a D 750 and neither am I..

Hate to be rude but I have to keep it real, bro. Nothing here to rave about..

just a guy wiyh eyes ?
You mean bad eyes ?

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=pentax_645z&attr13_1=nikon_d810&attr13_2=canon_eos5dmkiii&attr13_3=nikon_d750&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=100&attr16_1=100&attr16_2=100&attr16_3=100&normalization=full&widget=1&x=-0.05157816005983536&y=0.262676327569144

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2014 at 09:33 UTC
On Medium well done: Two takes on the Pentax 645Z article (240 comments in total)

Ming Thein have published a article about his experience with the 645Z, 6 months after.
http://blog.mingthein.com/2014/12/10/pentax-645z-six-months/
Sure, he's not a hispter with a camera, he knows how to use it, even for urbex :)

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2014 at 09:08 UTC as 22nd comment
On White Cockatoo in Silky Oak Tree photo in emem's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Lovely shot, welll done.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2014 at 20:19 UTC as 1st comment
On Sony Alpha 7 II real-world sample gallery posted article (231 comments in total)
In reply to:

RadPhoto: Does anyone know if the shutter sound still LOUD? I have an NEX5n and I just hate the loud shutter sound. Why would a mirrorless camera have a loud shutter sound?

Maybe we should ask nicely to the tester. :)
So, how is the shutter sound, please ?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 6, 2014 at 19:51 UTC

For Pentax, it was more than a rumor, it was in a interview from pentaxforum.com, where the Pentaxrep agree than they are looking for that technology.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 12:26 UTC as 42nd comment

They are some rumors about Pentax doing the same.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 06:39 UTC as 59th comment
On The misty church in the November Sky challenge (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

MenM: such a beauty

Thank you MenM. Apparently, the ones who rate it at 05 or 1 don't think the same :)

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 06:18 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2709 comments in total)
In reply to:

andymuns: All i can say is have look at this.... http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-7D-Mark-II-versus-Pentax-K-3-versus-Nikon-D7100___977_914_865
A $1800 camera should have a better sensor then Canon Eos 7d Mark II has...

Yeah, of course, there is a conspiracy to demote Canon sensors.
And if another sensor evaluation site make the same statement about Canon sensors, i guess they are in the conspiracy too...
http://www.senscore.org/

Direct link | Posted on Nov 21, 2014 at 05:32 UTC

Great a new Lolca camera !
This is hilarious, a 400$ Pentax K50, aOly or Pana 4/3 gives better results.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=leica_x113&attr13_1=panasonic_dmcgh4&attr13_2=pentax_k500&attr13_3=oly_em5&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=100&attr16_1=100&attr16_2=100&attr16_3=200&normalization=full&widget=1&x=0.315923566878981&y=0.8106842488487445

Direct link | Posted on Nov 13, 2014 at 07:55 UTC as 33rd comment
In reply to:

Everlast66: I think it is laughable to call anything associated with the M4/3 system "PRO"!!

Surely there would be one or two enthusiasts, but no normal professional will rely on a M4/3 sensor for their professional work.

I've never heard any of these names, sorry.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 3, 2014 at 08:31 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2709 comments in total)

Error - To delete

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2014 at 05:12 UTC as 167th comment
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1669 comments in total)

Many thanks to the Canon marketing team for the good laugh of the day.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 13:06 UTC as 465th comment | 2 replies
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1669 comments in total)
In reply to:

Segaman: Countdown to read trollers hating canon.
Gee, you guys spreads wrong infos all over the net, I wonder why.
If your camera is a lot better, why dont you guys go shoot some pics, instead of wasting your time and our time with your negative views.
I am glad I dont have to you guys in the forum I go daily, really sad

Well, sorry for you, but this is a Epic Fail from Canon...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 13:03 UTC
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1669 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sdaniella: user programmable pixel level multi-iso (multi-gain) full res color zone-system full frame Ultra-HDR (DR 22+ EV) stills (video) real time capture FF 40mp+ (adjustable + previewable LIVE with Canon Final Image Simulation) with IQ with clean finest detail and 'no noise' (NR that doesn't distort details) in extreme lowest light (below 0.01 lux) dual-pixel PDAF (full-frame) ... and throw in global shutter, too ... (sensor that runs much cooler than any todate; DiG!C #?) ... and up to 240fps+ (intended for HDR flexibility) ... H.265 for video 4k/8k and 2k/1080p ... and ... tri-mode evf-ovf hybrid VF with a top hinged modular VASS (vari-angle swivel screen) ... touch screen wifi remote ...

(\ /)
( o.o) ---( hehehehe ... )
o(")(")

as for medium format ... they'd have to create a whole bunch of EOS E-MF lenses ... unlikely (not impossible)

lol...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 12:55 UTC

Well, i'm not very excited about these.

check the texture of the bricks on the right pillar : watercolor fest !
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/photos/3038710/28_iso200_p1000166?inalbum=panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx100-samples-gallery
And this is a 200 iso shot in daylight...

I hoe this is just a internal jpg default, and than RAW gives better results.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 4, 2014 at 06:39 UTC as 152nd comment
On 7DII_beta_ISO100_030A9603 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

Couscousdelight: Where are the details ? It's all overexposed...
Why using a +1 exposure compensation ?

Thank you for the answer. But i dont' understand why a hasch direct light requires a +1 exposure compensation.

Regards.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 3, 2014 at 05:50 UTC
On 7DII_beta_ISO250_030A9526 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

This is pretty soft, maybe a effect of the diffraction at F14 ?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 30, 2014 at 07:47 UTC as 1st comment | 2 replies
Total: 213, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »