chp

Yes, that make me think i maybe should wait for the next generation, and bet that it will have an EVF of some sort....  It is bound to be, ultimately.

The problem I see is that everyone will have access to that same technology (by the way the N1 is currently lagging and definitely not the right choice to consider). Compare the economics between...

Agreed (except I would not call the panasonic a "PS". Point and shoot describe different cameras in the US and in the rest of the world)

Question: How much difficult do you find it to handle the 85% coverage limitation ? do you need to crop/reframe a lot ? (i am a VF shooter, no doubt, mostly have used SLRs  or EVF...) Tx

i agree it is an unbelievable value for the price, with the 16-50 it is 420€ on amazon. A local review here said "what remains to PS" and "the nex 3 is an unbelievable PS killer". I would get mad...

Sony RX100 excepted. And Olympus XZ2 excepted. And probably a few more recent others...

and even 1 in 20 is pretty bad, I'd say. is that what other X20's owner woud say as well ?

Size, iq close to dslr, but boring = rx100 Size, style, = fuji xf1 (manual zoom, good IQ -exr sensor-, tons of style) slightly bigger, style, manual zoom = X10 or X20 (i would go X20 rather than...

Sounds pretty much like I would do (but as I mentionned i shoot primarily 28 and 100mm). For me I may even just add the 12 and the 75. I certainly would see the 12 as a good addition (there is...

here http://www.lemondedelaphoto.com/Sony-E-16-50-mm-f-3-5-5-6-OSS-Le,7743.html and here also http://www.ephotozine.com/article/sony-e-16-50mm-f-3-5-5-6-oss-lens-review-20667 Their result do not...

I am talking from reading dpreview. Lot of people complain that the X20 is noiser than the X10 (but the "noise" page of the review of the X20 shows the opposite when comparing the X10 and X20 side...

no it is much easier than it looks like. When comparing apertures the focal length is irrelevant, where light is concerned. F2 = F2 ;) then for any given lens, each stop means a factor 2 for the...

if you do not use the 75 then just forget the 14-150 and bring the 45 (my understanding is that you do not use anything above 75 which means, anything above 60). I am not traveling with many lenses...

There is a test here http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=3571 I do not like it too much though because the scales are too small both on x and y axis and we do not see much of what is happening. I...

interesting picture, and interesting perspective about when to use one rather than the other. I like the high speed sync idea too, i have that with my a1 and it proved pretty usefull (but i would...

Very valuable opinion to me. I too would prefer a (hypothetic) X25-EV, improved X20 with a viewfinder ;)  I might jump on it); I'm hoping Fuji might be working on it at this time, too... ;) Back to...

Thanks In what sense are the images much better ? Do the pictures still qualify for "much better" when lights goes down ? where you can still use 100 iso with the fuji and have to go down to 400iso...

Good evening all. Can anyone having used both comment on either of these ? I like the manual zoom of the X20, the side "tool of the good old days". I am concerned about handling it though (no...

I am interested in knowing what you will come up to... I like the idea of the ovf though with all the information in the translucid lcd..... (if it is usable, which i do not know: is the coverage...

;) I am sure you and me will agree there is a huge gap between taking pictures at a wedding (maybe even very very good pictures, which most of us can do I am sure! Even with a Nex !) and actually...