zevobh

zevobh

Joined on May 22, 2011

Comments

Total: 44, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Almeida: Are people buying these crop cameras?

huh?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 5, 2014 at 22:42 UTC
On Nikon D610 Review preview (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: Gold? Come on guys, nothing is changed within a year and so, but your ranking still is gold!
For instance, the same kind of changes has been made from T2i to T3I (even more substantial), but the first received gold, the second one silver, which is logical.
Would you give a gold star another t2i announced this year, say t5? I don't think so(even considering price category change).
So it will be logical to change either d610 to silver, or give no award, saying D610 is a continuation of D600 with fixed bags.
Secondly, your comparing tool at the conclusions page is totally irrelevant. Comparing D600 vs D610 nothing changes substantially, besides the value row. How will you explain me the fact that D610 received gold award, nothing has changed upon D600 to the worse, but it is half the value(even the announced price,maybe by 100$, but they have been fairly similarly priced when announced)?

not everyone had the problem. they do their review based of their unit, not on angry bloggers.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 16, 2014 at 20:59 UTC
On Nikon D610 Review preview (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

clauderobidoux: Just got some pictures ready for a stock agency this morning. Took me about an hour just to clean dust spots... really annoying! Please Nikon if there's one technology you should focus on is getting rid of this problem, or at least find a way to improve it significantly.

send it in, they will replace it for free.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 16, 2014 at 20:57 UTC
In reply to:

gerard boulanger: Relatively "affordable". 14 stops DR is a little disappointment.

really? I don't know much about MF, what would a good MF camera have?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2014 at 00:15 UTC
In reply to:

cheddargav: Interesting for videographers I guess

if videographers want to shoot at f/6.3.

I doubt it.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2014 at 16:01 UTC
In reply to:

AV Janus: Not as cool as APSC version since it starts at boring 28mm.

um, actually that sort of makes a world of difference.

to my eyes, it is the difference between wide angle, and standard.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2014 at 16:01 UTC

anyone planning on an extravagant camera purchase please opt for an M-E with summilux 50mm f1.4. there would be 10k well spent.

or just get a freaking a99.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 05:17 UTC as 157th comment
On FroKnowsPhoto's Video Guide on sale news story (143 comments in total)
In reply to:

jacketgiang: This guy reminds me Ken Rockwell, but it seems like Ken Rockwell knows a lot more about photography than this guy.

nutpea summed it up perfectly.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 22, 2013 at 18:14 UTC
On Samyang announces 10mm F2.8 manual focus wide-angle prime news story (133 comments in total)
In reply to:

trulandphoto: This might just be my next EOS-M lens. But do I get EF mount so I can use it with my 7D and the adapter on the EOS-M or the EF-M mount version?

everyone! we found the EOS M owner!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 6, 2013 at 23:01 UTC
On Canon announces EOS M2 in Japan news story (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

Debankur Mukherjee: When will Nikon come out with such a camera.......??

what about the 1 cameras?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 4, 2013 at 06:02 UTC
On Roger Cicala cynically re-defines photography news story (54 comments in total)
In reply to:

WT21: I love lensrentals an roger's blog, but he got bokeh wrong. Bokeh is

"the quantitative measure of depth of field. Objectively, more bokeh is better than less. Lens makers have at last understood what photography experts on internet boards have been telling them, with lenses whose bokeh now goes up to 11. Any lens that cannot go to 11 bokeh is an inferior lens.

Bokeh is impacted by sensor size. m43 sensors, for instance, only have 1/2 the bokeh of full frame sensors."

generally, I think a lower number is better for bokeh.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 26, 2013 at 06:32 UTC
On Roger Cicala cynically re-defines photography news story (54 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: Nice. ;-)

"Silence – The response of many wives and at least one camera company when an obvious problem arises."

marike6, which company do you think Cicala means?

nikon. definitely nikon.

d600 to d610, and SB 900 to SB 910, the patter in obvious.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 26, 2013 at 06:28 UTC
On Canon Korea teases new camera, EOS M2 or SL1/100D? news story (259 comments in total)
In reply to:

Homam: Can't believe there is so much negativity already! No one actually knows what the camera is!!! Let's not forget Canon still holds the record when it comes to best-selling cameras, and let's not forget Canon was the first to introduce DSLRs, was the first to introduce Video in DSLRs like 5dMII which revolutionized the DSLR market and took digital photography to another level...

Well I suppose Canon know what they're doing. If you don't like or need the new camera that Canon announces you'd better stick to what you already own...

first to introduce video? what about the d90?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 10, 2013 at 18:41 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2817 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: It looks like the camera which made from 3 different cameras of different time. Photoeclecticism. Bad work of designer. Set-off. No style, not conceptual.
Even new Fuji, Sony A7 or Panasoniс are more stylish.

Is it real to switch this camera by one arm?

and " I found this giant box of knobs!"

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 07:28 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2817 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nikonuser57: In the market for a D610 and now have just seen this. Currently own and use a Film FE2 and love it. Shame the video is missing on the Df but if the full functionality of older non-AF Nikon lenses can be employed, this is a brilliant substitute. Not happy about the price when the D610 body is about $2299 AU. This Df is a bit too expensive for aesthetics alone and only 16MP?? They can do a lot better for this price I'm sure. Older Nikon Die-hards will love the outer design. Definitely going to do a hands on assessment before I buy but so far the D610 or D800 is best and I can still use all my old Nikon lenses very effectively.

oh, but imagine the size of the pixels at 16 megs and full frame… lovely...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 07:26 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2817 comments in total)
In reply to:

reginalddwight: OVF with split-image screen? Nope.

Hybrid OVF with EVF and focus peaking? Forget about it.

Nikon, what's the point of having a retro-style camera that supports a slew of legacy manual focus AI and non-AI lenses but offers only a small green dot in the OVF as the primary focusing aid?

YES YES YES YES. at least offer a swappable focus screen!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 07:24 UTC
In reply to:

padrelar: I use my OM-1 when I fly. Flight attendants aren't sure what to do about a camera that never needs to be "on" to begin with.

ever had any problems with the x-ray scanners?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 03:18 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows news story (1513 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photoworks: Why only 16mp? Is this camera designed to shoot at 10fps, like a D4? If not, it should have been 24mp with no AA filter.

probably for the noise performance. big pixels = low noise.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 2, 2013 at 02:09 UTC
On Nikon video hints at long-desired 'digital FM' news story (554 comments in total)
In reply to:

arhmatic: If this happens to be true, one thing - what took you so long, Nikon?

and sony. they have been leading in the huge sensor compact range for a while.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2013 at 04:37 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: When you see a pixel you will die! Better safe than sorry. Of course when a screen is made for pc then 1080p is enough for a 27" screen. That is because pc-screens are safe and people do not need high resolution.

exactly, why in freaking hell can I buy a 5.5 inch screen over 1080p but I cant have a 24 inch one over that?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 19, 2013 at 15:16 UTC
Total: 44, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »