zevobh

zevobh

Joined on May 22, 2011

Comments

Total: 53, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

D1N0: We were hoping for a 50 1.2 Samyang!

me want quarter stop.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2014 at 04:42 UTC
On article Hasselblad unveils pixel-shifting 200MP H5D-200c MS (231 comments in total)
In reply to:

johnbandry: At what point would the resolution of the captured image outdo the (current technology) limits of ability of printers to print it? In other words, what is the maximum number of pixels a high-end printer (of any technology) can output onto a single sheet of paper?

That's in one go, without chopping the image into pieces to be printed separately and then reassembled, as in a billboard.

never. high end printer can print at least at 2880 x 1440 dpi. the epson 11880 can, and at 64in x however long your roll is. lets say you print square, that is still a 16,986,931,200 pixel print, or 17 gigapixle.

Link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 18:12 UTC
In reply to:

lem12: This x100s is probably one of the nicest looking rangefinder camera out there.

other then the small fact that it isn't a range finder

Link | Posted on May 3, 2014 at 00:42 UTC
On article SmugMug Films: Master of illusions (41 comments in total)
In reply to:

stratplaya: I'd like to take Photoshop lessons from Grimes.

actually, I am wrong. they seemed to choose literally his worst work for this article though...

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 05:19 UTC
On article SmugMug Films: Master of illusions (41 comments in total)
In reply to:

stratplaya: I'd like to take Photoshop lessons from Grimes.

really? those sun beams are ghastly, and the shadow on the runner is almost worse.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 05:17 UTC
In reply to:

Zeisschen: Many won't like it as it's some "digital magic" compared to a good old sensor and expensive lens. But in a few years we will be able to make clean low light 4k videos in 3D with shallow depth of field effect at night at ISO 25.000 on our 500$ smartphones and the results might look better than from todays 100.000$ cinema equipment.

That's technology, cheers on the engineers who make such things possible and affordable!

which makes you wonder, what will the $100k cameras of then look like?

Link | Posted on Apr 18, 2014 at 22:56 UTC
In reply to:

Almeida: Are people buying these crop cameras?

huh?

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2014 at 22:42 UTC
On article Nikon D610 Review (404 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: Gold? Come on guys, nothing is changed within a year and so, but your ranking still is gold!
For instance, the same kind of changes has been made from T2i to T3I (even more substantial), but the first received gold, the second one silver, which is logical.
Would you give a gold star another t2i announced this year, say t5? I don't think so(even considering price category change).
So it will be logical to change either d610 to silver, or give no award, saying D610 is a continuation of D600 with fixed bags.
Secondly, your comparing tool at the conclusions page is totally irrelevant. Comparing D600 vs D610 nothing changes substantially, besides the value row. How will you explain me the fact that D610 received gold award, nothing has changed upon D600 to the worse, but it is half the value(even the announced price,maybe by 100$, but they have been fairly similarly priced when announced)?

not everyone had the problem. they do their review based of their unit, not on angry bloggers.

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2014 at 20:59 UTC
On article Nikon D610 Review (404 comments in total)
In reply to:

clauderobidoux: Just got some pictures ready for a stock agency this morning. Took me about an hour just to clean dust spots... really annoying! Please Nikon if there's one technology you should focus on is getting rid of this problem, or at least find a way to improve it significantly.

send it in, they will replace it for free.

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2014 at 20:57 UTC
In reply to:

gerard boulanger: Relatively "affordable". 14 stops DR is a little disappointment.

really? I don't know much about MF, what would a good MF camera have?

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2014 at 00:15 UTC
In reply to:

cheddargav: Interesting for videographers I guess

if videographers want to shoot at f/6.3.

I doubt it.

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2014 at 16:01 UTC
In reply to:

AV Janus: Not as cool as APSC version since it starts at boring 28mm.

um, actually that sort of makes a world of difference.

to my eyes, it is the difference between wide angle, and standard.

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2014 at 16:01 UTC

anyone planning on an extravagant camera purchase please opt for an M-E with summilux 50mm f1.4. there would be 10k well spent.

or just get a freaking a99.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 05:17 UTC as 164th comment
On article FroKnowsPhoto's Video Guide on sale (143 comments in total)
In reply to:

jacketgiang: This guy reminds me Ken Rockwell, but it seems like Ken Rockwell knows a lot more about photography than this guy.

nutpea summed it up perfectly.

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2013 at 18:14 UTC
In reply to:

trulandphoto: This might just be my next EOS-M lens. But do I get EF mount so I can use it with my 7D and the adapter on the EOS-M or the EF-M mount version?

everyone! we found the EOS M owner!

Link | Posted on Dec 6, 2013 at 23:01 UTC
On article Canon announces EOS M2 in Japan (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

Debankur Mukherjee: When will Nikon come out with such a camera.......??

what about the 1 cameras?

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2013 at 06:02 UTC
On article Roger Cicala cynically re-defines photography (53 comments in total)
In reply to:

WT21: I love lensrentals an roger's blog, but he got bokeh wrong. Bokeh is

"the quantitative measure of depth of field. Objectively, more bokeh is better than less. Lens makers have at last understood what photography experts on internet boards have been telling them, with lenses whose bokeh now goes up to 11. Any lens that cannot go to 11 bokeh is an inferior lens.

Bokeh is impacted by sensor size. m43 sensors, for instance, only have 1/2 the bokeh of full frame sensors."

generally, I think a lower number is better for bokeh.

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2013 at 06:32 UTC
On article Roger Cicala cynically re-defines photography (53 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: Nice. ;-)

"Silence – The response of many wives and at least one camera company when an obvious problem arises."

marike6, which company do you think Cicala means?

nikon. definitely nikon.

d600 to d610, and SB 900 to SB 910, the patter in obvious.

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2013 at 06:28 UTC
On article Canon Korea teases new camera, EOS M2 or SL1/100D? (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

Homam: Can't believe there is so much negativity already! No one actually knows what the camera is!!! Let's not forget Canon still holds the record when it comes to best-selling cameras, and let's not forget Canon was the first to introduce DSLRs, was the first to introduce Video in DSLRs like 5dMII which revolutionized the DSLR market and took digital photography to another level...

Well I suppose Canon know what they're doing. If you don't like or need the new camera that Canon announces you'd better stick to what you already own...

first to introduce video? what about the d90?

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2013 at 18:41 UTC
Total: 53, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »