3 is a crowd ?!?!
what a wonderful and appetizing picture, the figs really look alive. congratulations on the first prize
CG33: Great shot!I like the 3D effect.
dear cg33, thanks for the compliments.
dear tarakanchik, thanks for your compliment, especially as it was given even before any other comment.
Dear Figsbury, I agree and I believe that voting rules should be changed - voting only on the cover!
I suggest that all challenge allowing free use of P.P. will be a double entry, including the original, before appling P.P.
I send you a 1200 pixels tall but it was DQ "too big" - way?
something happened in your site, i think. since yesterday morning i can't upload pics to your different challenges. my explorer is version 8.0.6001.18702 and it worked beautifully up till now. i tried to upload on another computer with the same bad results. i suggest that you check your end and see if the problem is there .thanks
For the last few hours I cannot enter my pics into this and other challenges.it seems that i can't go beyond the step of "upload image".
what do you suggest I do ?
Actualy Frogner Park.vigeland was a scukptor -ordered to make 2 statues but made 2,000 !
A colorful nice shot' but like in most of the comments, I suggest cropping the darker left side and part of the upper sky.On the other hand I like the beautiful reflections on the water.Please try subbmiting an improved version.
a very nice shot of a not so ugly duck , the red decorations all over the face is very photogenic. all i can think of improving is cropping a bit of the upper part of the picture and making the reds a little more vivid.i didn't vote for this challenge but i'm sure i would have given it at least a 4.
this is a much improved version. still, i agree with Patty Capps comments.i would suggest cropping to show mostly the upper right corner, in a square format , that would eliminate the background diversion in the left upper corner.of course, the best solution would be to take a new shot that would illustrate this nice idea of a wet red flower.
I agree to most of the previous comments,and particularly to landscape cropping, cutting part of the top and part of the bottom.initially i liked very much the antic look, "lo-fi" quality of the picture, but after watching it for a while, i think that more vivid colors would help.i really expect to see an improved version of the picture.
i guess that you entered the "TIME" challenge. in my view , closeup of part of the watch is ok but the watch hands are not sharp enough. the seconds hand blur signifies movement but i would have liked to see the other 2 hands much sharper. i like very much the sepia antique color.
Congratulations an excellent photo and worhy winner!