Superka

Superka

Lives in USSR (former) USSR (former)
Works as a Architect
Has a website at http://superka-photo.com/
Joined on Jun 22, 2009

Comments

Total: 240, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

I love you, Sigma! Your 30/1.4 for APS-C is the best, your FF 50/1.4 is the best, and now 35/1.4!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 09:48 UTC as 54th comment
In reply to:

petr marek: But wait, who will buy those overpriced Canon "C" cameras???

I would not!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2012 at 21:28 UTC

Black Magic has sensor with Global Shutter, as far as I know. Very good news!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2012 at 20:18 UTC as 40th comment | 1 reply

HDMI or not HDMI - Canon 5Dm3 video is much better than Nikon or Sony DSLR. Panasonic video is the best, though.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 09:35 UTC as 9th comment | 3 replies

Canon, you are the best! I cannot afford 5Dm3, but it fantastic camera
Dave Dugdale nice review.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuozUxh_tOU

Direct link | Posted on Oct 23, 2012 at 19:29 UTC as 19th comment
In reply to:

Superka: I must say, I need good film scanner. Because I have found ideal camera among film cameras (Xpan and panoramic 617).
Hasselblad X5 is a good scanner, but too expensive :(

Mischivo , I know Nikon 5000 scans are great, many of my films were scanned at Nikon 5000. Tnanks for plustek link, but I doubt it will be good as Nikon 8000/9000. Plustek never was perfect.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2012 at 15:33 UTC

I must say, I need good film scanner. Because I have found ideal camera among film cameras (Xpan and panoramic 617).
Hasselblad X5 is a good scanner, but too expensive :(

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2012 at 11:28 UTC as 101st comment | 3 replies

Digital Fuji TX-1 (Hasselblad Xpan) - that what I need. Just the same design. It can be with no LCD-screen at all (I don't mind). There are no digital panoramic cameras, they all 3:2 (some 3:4).

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2012 at 07:22 UTC as 108th comment

Vey good. Sligtly better then 5Dm3 even. Nice job, Sony.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 5, 2012 at 01:14 UTC as 24th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

putomax: RAW in this machine (so it seems) is going to be incredible. Slightly better than the K5, which is already fantastic. The only camera with better SN ratio is the X-pro1, and I've seen quite some smearing of details at the former's high isos.
Just an absolutely unscientific speculation, but that you know already ;)

gashô

What is K5? Never heard

Direct link | Posted on Oct 5, 2012 at 01:11 UTC

Why not to post also kg, sm, meters here, on Dpreview?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 3, 2012 at 01:29 UTC as 5th comment
On Photokina 2012: Interview - Dirk Jasper of Nikon article (220 comments in total)
In reply to:

Superka: And what about Auto ISO function? Is it as good as Nikon D800 or poor as Nikon D7000?

All Nikon's Auto ISO function exept D800 (at last) doesn't take into account current focal length. DPreview has mentioned this several times in their reviews.
Auto ISO function was much more clever in Canon cameras, and only D800 is good, even somehow better then Canon's

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 18:27 UTC
On Photokina 2012: Interview - Dirk Jasper of Nikon article (220 comments in total)

And what about Auto ISO function? Is it as good as Nikon D800 or poor as Nikon D7000?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 15:23 UTC as 69th comment | 4 replies
On Hasselblad responds to Lunar criticisms article (628 comments in total)

Almost perfect street photography/candid camera!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 15:12 UTC as 133rd comment
On Photokina 2012: Fujifilm Stand Report article (26 comments in total)

Thank you Fuji for your LF lenses!!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 16:55 UTC as 7th comment
On Photokina 2012: Panasonic Stand Report article (30 comments in total)

GIRL!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 17:41 UTC as 12th comment

I love this colors!!!!!! looks like my perfect Holga!!!!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 15:23 UTC as 25th comment

Hasselblad has nothing to attract attention?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 15:18 UTC as 398th comment

Hasselblad is here and there... Xpan was made by Fuji, X5 scanners by Imacon, no lenses by Hasselblad at all. But everyone knows Hasselblad and someone wants it!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 15:05 UTC as 107th comment
In reply to:

Franka T.L.: Those who keep saying and wishing for a digital X-pan would probably find their Anti-Climax here , and a big big surprise .... LOL

there were some rumors about digital Xpan, but we saw this #^^T)@

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 15:02 UTC
Total: 240, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »