Superka

Superka

Lives in USSR (former) USSR (former)
Works as a Architect
Has a website at http://superka-photo.com/
Joined on Jun 22, 2009

Comments

Total: 252, showing: 201 – 220
« First‹ Previous910111213Next ›Last »

We expect more from you, Canon.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 01:05 UTC as 35th comment
On Nikon D800 preview (1110 comments in total)
In reply to:

KellyBlake: I do interior( architectural ), landscape and portrait photography. Should I buy a used D700 for $1800 or buy the D800 for $3000? I have some DX lenses that I would still like to use and it seems that the D700 in DX mode will downsize the megapixels to 5mp versus the D800 will downsize to 12mp. What would you do?

I prefer Large Format camera for Architecture and Landscape photography. But if I had to choose between D700 and D800 - I would buy new camera for sure.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2012 at 17:56 UTC
On Nikon D800 and D800E 36MP full-frame DSLRs announced article (271 comments in total)

Glad to see more and more FF cameras under 3000$. 36Mpx may be too much for 36x24, but lets see test images. I'll wait for Canon answer.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2012 at 17:44 UTC as 23rd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

noirdude: might as well spend $4000 for a D3s or $6000 for a D4.. yes they are much bigger but 8x better in all aspects than this fujiyama thing..

Yes! And Canon is 100x better!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 02:26 UTC

OVERPRICED! FUJI! How could you!? I won't buy it.
I would prefer Leica M6 film camera (digital is too expensive), and I would have film, not a "film-like" sensor .

Direct link | Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 02:14 UTC as 165th comment | 1 reply
On First full-res Fujifilm X-Pro1 images appear on the web article (216 comments in total)

Fuji is rather big! Or, maybe those guys are small :)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 1, 2012 at 03:16 UTC as 84th comment
On First full-res Fujifilm X-Pro1 images appear on the web article (216 comments in total)

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /blog/wp-content/uploads/DSF9287raw.jpg on this server.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 1, 2012 at 03:10 UTC as 85th comment

I''m fan of OM and still use it, more then my Canon DSLR. Any of OM camera or lens are fantastic. Viewfinder magnification is 0.95 - when contemporary full-frame DSLR have 0.76
I would be happy there will be such a perfect digital camera, with the same bayonet, let it be without AF even.
But if it would be 4/3, then it is all about stile, not features.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2012 at 06:35 UTC as 84th comment | 1 reply
On Automating Photoshop article (33 comments in total)

Here is an example (in eyeon Fusion):
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7032/6627955493_a9d39d44f7_o.jpg
the photo is merged to itself by Soft Light, The red channel was aplied as a mask of this merge, and the blur is apllied to this mask. You have to copy layer and channel to do this in Photoshop, and this will increase your file size greatly. And can blur your mask only once, while in node system programs you can alwayschange what you need.

Compositing programs are great for editing photos, and those who have deal with them - use mostly themm and not photoshop.
But they have 2 disadvantages:
1. No .crw .nef or any other raw, made by a photo camera support. Thou raw, made by digital movie camera (red one, for example) are supported.
2 Not good for retouching.

So, why did I wrote this?
To let you know, that if you need Automating and Color Corection (which is much better in Compositing soft) - there are fantastic alternative, and how the real automating looks.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2012 at 04:33 UTC as 22nd comment
On Automating Photoshop article (33 comments in total)

Those, who work in post-production studios know well about compositing programs. Thou this compositing software is created for movie-makers, they are great for photo editing, too. Those programs have great advantages over photoshop: parametric node system interface. This has several effects:

1. non-destructivity

2. Great convenience of work, because you work with 2-dimensional node interface, not 1-dimensional layers system.

3. No need in Actions, because the node system is actions itself. Any custom tool can be a set of nodes, which you can copy/paste from project to project.

4. Small file sizes - about 100Kb, while editing photos in photoshop can boost file sizes in 10 times.

5. You have 2 or more screens to compare

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7154/6627956255_d1e3981630_o.jpg

6. Nodes can be instances
AND MANY MORE...

Apple Shake
Nuke
Eyeon Fusion
these programs are most good and famous

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2012 at 04:33 UTC as 23rd comment
On Just Posted: Nikon 1 V1 and J1 review article (442 comments in total)

I don''t understand what for and whom for this camera. While many of photographers are waiting for cameras with big sensor, fast prime lens (interchangable or not) in a small body, seems neither Nikon, nor Canon gonna satisfy us.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2012 at 07:41 UTC as 90th comment | 1 reply
On Overloaded, in more ways then one. in the Overload! challenge (1 comment in total)

Hi-hi, nice shot!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 19, 2012 at 02:52 UTC as 1st comment
On Overloaded ! in the Overload! challenge (3 comments in total)

Fantastic! Which country??

Direct link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 23:36 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On Taxi in Shekawati in the Overload! challenge (1 comment in total)

I love this car! And I love India!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 23:34 UTC as 1st comment

I have a powerful 12GB machine for the need of CG in cinema. Many CG studios still use Windows XP 64 because it saves memory for rendering 3D siquences. We don''t need allocating extra processes in memory in Windows 7 to work faster, because it is not faster. It is slower. Windows XP 64 is the best Win OS ever.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 13:32 UTC as 22nd comment
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot G1 X samples gallery article (425 comments in total)

I wish it where more noisy. Some noise reduction artefacts are visible.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 04:46 UTC as 77th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

hb2000: Sounds like some really good new features; however, I'm disappointed LR4 will not run on Windows XP. With web statistics showing 35-40% of Windows users still running XP, I would think that would make a case to not abandon us XP users. Many of us XP users cannot afford to upgrade to Windows 7 just to run LR4, so I guess our only upgrade path is a competitor's product!

I do agree with you. Windows 7 is awful, eating 1GB of RAM, while XP 64 eats 250Mb and much quicker and responsive. Why should we use Windows 7, when it is worse? BECAUSE MICROSOFT WANTS THIS!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 04:25 UTC

NOT Supporting Windows XP, Windows XP 64. VERY NICE! I do have very powerful computer, but I HATE WINDOWS 7 for using 1GB of RAM, instead of 250MB as Windows XP 64. Neither of my 12 GB of RAM are unnecessary.
I feel that Adobe and Microsoft both force us to use this awful and stupid Windows 7. There are much more complicated software, supporting Windows XP 64.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 04:17 UTC as 30th comment | 8 replies
On Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact article (776 comments in total)

NOTE! This camera, which is supposed to be advanced point-and-shoot, don''t have those stupid modes like SPORT, NIGHT PORTRAIT, etc, which Canon DSLR up to 60D have. Its mode dial, combined with exposure compensation is much better then any Canon DSLR mode dial. What a shame on Canon.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2012 at 01:36 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies

Auto Focus? Auto Focus? Does it work? Is it fast?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 13, 2012 at 16:37 UTC as 97th comment
Total: 252, showing: 201 – 220
« First‹ Previous910111213Next ›Last »