Biowizard

Bye bye Adobe Reader XI - never liked you anyway.

Just hope my Photoshop CS6 has not been compromised by source code hacks.

Brian

I agree. 4/3 has (er, had?) lenses which were proud successors to the OM-mound Zuikos. Utterly gorgeous glass in search of the perfect body. Sadly m4/3 was built as a CSC system, with toy-sized...

Actually to be fair, NO, I do NOT regret it. The Oly E-1 is a MASSIVELY LOVELY camera, which I have totally enjoyed for nearly 10 years, and thanks to Oly's latest change of direction, I hope to...

I agree that the E-1 sucked at "high" ISO - so apart from a couple of indoor theatre shoots, when I had to resort to a tripod, I've always shot at 100. But for a "mere" 5Mpixels, I have to say the...

Now a fully-manual focus, Full-Frame DSLR with the original OM mount, would SERIOUSLY get my chequebook out and into action ...

That's rubbish: the magnification value is LINEAR, and you are quotomg AREA. So you should SQUARE the magnification factorin your calculations:

OM-D EM-1:

17.3 * 13 * (1.48^2) =...

That's rubbish: the magnification value is LINEAR, and you are quoting AREA. So you should SQUARE the magnification factorin your calculations:

OM-D EM-1:

17.3 * 13 * (1.48^2) =...

That's rubbish: the magnification value is LINEAR, and you are quoting AREA. So you should SQUARE the magnification factor in your calculations:

OM-D EM-1:

17.3 * 13 * (1.48^2) =...

Only two were ever intended as flagship models (E-3, E-5). I liked neither as much as my E-1. The other E- cameras were very down-spec in terms of build quality - some even using mirrors rather...

As an E-1 users of around 10 years' standing, and having shot many thousands of images on its mere 5Mp sensor, I have been waiting patiently for the "right" successor. It wasn't the E-3. Not the...

As an E-1 user of around 10 years' standing, and having shot many thousands of images on its "mere" 5Mp sensor, I have been waiting patiently for the "right" successor. It wasn't the E-3. Nor the...

Agreed - the E-1 is amazing, and STILL my only DSLR. Like you, not ONE spec of dust in 10 years. And the only hot pixel the sensor had, from the outset, was "lost" with a simple in-camera pixel...

I'll stick to using my TG-1 thanks ...

Amazing images! And perfectly suited to high-contrast B&W presentation.

The funny thing is, with today's technology (which of course has come a LONG way since then), this might be doable. Using low-energy WiFi or BlueTooth to connect/control the device while in-camera,...

I am STILL waiting patiently (but for how much longer) for an E-7. I just LOVE the original 4/3rds concept and the amazing lenses. Please give me a modern sensor and DSLR body to replace my ageing...

To white shadow: thanks for your encouragement - I definitely want to go full frame, both for depth of field reasons, and to maximise image quality from any new, prime glass I buy.

To Yxa: my...

My last 35mm film camera that I kept with me at nearly all times, was a Contax S2 - titanium bodied, 100% mechanical shutter - fitted with a Ziess Planar 50mm f1.4. If I wanted other focal lengths,...

Actually (thanks cknapp61) I *am* an iPhone user. And iPad. But also, decent (if old) DSLR.

Prints? Via Polaroid?! Pur-leeze!!! If I want to print from ANY of my kit, I have some jolly decent...

PS - just as well the cameras are small, because ... oops, no, better not go there! 8-)

Brian