danniii

I can vouch for the 180mm f3.5 and I am guessing the newer f2.8 will also be up to snuff.

Silly me I thought people concider you professional because you take outstanding images, not because of the brand of camera you use.

Yeah there is a market for things mode by designers. It's not the normal photography market. Now that I think about I think the guy mentioned something about it in the article.

Depends on the actual difference in image quality and what I want to be shooting for instance. If I do mostly macro work or wildlife photography I could make a real case for the APSC....

I like the 180mm macro lens

I don't really see the difference between 16 bit tiff and DNG in the case of Sigma raw files - since the format isn't mosaicked like other raw formats, the only option in DNG is rgb planes which...

There are three numbers you need to be aware of 46mp - this is the amount of data that is collected from the sensor, 15mp this is the number of pixels that show up in the final image and 25-30mp...

(the 180mm f3.5) not too bad to carry around... I notice it a little when it's on the camera - I don't really notice it when it is in it's pouch. Since I picked up my SD1m in March my older 180mm...

That price to me looks cheaper than the f3.5 180mm macro I was looking at on B & H last year.

My favourite lens on the SD1m is the 180mm f3.5 macro - I imagine the newer f2.8 lens will be good also.I also have the 10-20mm, the 50mm f1.4, the 70mm f2.8.

My camera prior to getting the SD14 ended up being taped... It got dropped a few times, from fairly high heights onto concrete. The tape was holding it together largely. Finally it turned on in my...