AussieJo

AussieJo

Lives in Canada Toronto, Canada
Has a website at www.createdimage.com.au
Joined on Oct 27, 2009

Comments

Total: 73, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Father's Day challenge (1 comment in total)

Just to clarify - I do expect this to be a portrait of your father - ie I do expect his face to be showing, - but he also needs to be doing something that gives us a sense of who he is. He is not allowed just to be sitting there.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 4, 2013 at 22:55 UTC as 1st comment
On Time Lapsed Landscapes challenge (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

Car629: There is no example posted Aussie Jo.

Now posted. I was looking on the wrong screen and though I couldn't post until the challenge was announced, which I now realise I was wrong.

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2013 at 12:32 UTC
On Hands Lifted in Prayer or Worship challenge (2 comments in total)

No religion is specified.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2013 at 13:11 UTC as 1st comment
On Love challenge (5 comments in total)

My mistake. I should have specified as a rule that no images of a sexual nature will be allowed as it is a disallowed theme by DPR. As such any images of two animals mating will be disqualified.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2013 at 18:33 UTC as 3rd comment
On Machu Picchu - Dirty Feet in the Feet challenge (2 comments in total)

If I had my way as the challenge host, this should have been the clear winner of this challenge. As soon as I saw this image when it was submitted I thought it should win as it was exactly what my intention for this challange was. I'm sorry that I didn't make my intnetions clearer in my description for this challange, but thankyou for getting the right vision for the challenge anyway.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2013 at 00:20 UTC as 2nd comment
On toesies in the Feet challenge (2 comments in total)

This is a gorgeous photo and in any other challenge I would have wished it to do well. But in this challenge, my aim was to have fascinating tourist backgrounds as the main feature of the photo and the feet just as a focal point. Unfortunately it is apparent that I did not make my intentions clear enough, so enjoy your win.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2013 at 00:18 UTC as 2nd comment
On Feet challenge (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

Collett: THIS CHALLENGE SHOULD BE THROWN OUT. INCONSISTENT AND ABRITRARY RULES HAVE BEEN APPLIED.

My recollection of the sequence of events differs from yours as I know you were one of the last entries, but lets not continue to argue.

What photo entrants don't see if the vast array of submitted entries that are off theme that as the host you have to make countless decisions about, balanced against comments and complaints about entries that are either about the need to be more or less strict about the interpretation and implimentation of the rules.

I'm sorry for any confusion over what the theme was about but I am satisfied that all entries were held to the same standards in the end.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 21:38 UTC
On Feet challenge (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

Collett: THIS CHALLENGE SHOULD BE THROWN OUT. INCONSISTENT AND ABRITRARY RULES HAVE BEEN APPLIED.

Actually I have not changed my criteria for disqual since before you entered your photos that were disqualified and before you made any comments.

That aside, as a challenge host I try to create challenges that are clear and assume people will only enter photos that meet the theme. Then people entered photos that were off theme and I was left wondering if I was the one at fault. So I started off allowing some questionable entries while disqualifying other entries for not being an interesting background. Then a person rightly stated that the theme of the challenge clearly stated in two places that I asked for photos that showed "Your feet". So I rightly made that the criteria by which all photos where disqualified, which meant that I had to reinstate some entries to be fair. Determining what makes an interesting background is subjective so I am leaving that to the voters.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 18:59 UTC
On Feet challenge (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

Collett: THIS CHALLENGE SHOULD BE THROWN OUT. INCONSISTENT AND ABRITRARY RULES HAVE BEEN APPLIED.

Such As? I only had one rule by which I disqualified (and I disqualified over half the entries). The photo had to be of YOUR feet. The other half of the rules I will leave to the voters - to determine how interesting the background is.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 12:16 UTC
On Feet challenge (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

tim and jan: tim and jan

jan wants to know why you think there not her feet.

Are the feet that appear in the photo belonging to the person who took the photo, and if so how did you achieve the POV?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 00:09 UTC
On Feet challenge (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

klaas-Rotterdam: I can live with the fact that my picture has been dq-ed according the rules but because of the background of some of the current entries I tought let us give it a try.

Regards,
Klaas

I just cancelled the disquallification on this photo and a couple others. On reassessment I decided that technically it meets the criteria of it being your feet with a background and I will leave it up to the voters to decide how fantastic it is.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 17, 2013 at 00:29 UTC
On Footprints challenge (3 comments in total)

Small typo, big impact. Thanks for asking. Now corrected.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 15, 2013 at 12:56 UTC as 1st comment
On Feet Cleaning in the Feet challenge (1 comment in total)

I have recieved a complaint about this entry, stating that it is not an interesting background. If i disqualify this one, I also have to disqualify the entry with the mouse and the dog as they are all the same type of entry of someone taking a photo of something they deem interesting at their feet. Technically I believe they have fulfulled the challenge requirements and I will leave it up to the voters to decide how interesting the background is.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 15, 2013 at 02:34 UTC as 1st comment
On Feet challenge (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

blosshapperter: I do not get why shoes with background are OK.
Especially when feet (without background) are NOT OK.
Is the challenge name shoes?

Also I note the statement 'YOUR feet'. When you take this into account the number of valid applications twindle to vitually zero because the POV proves it impossible to be the case...

Actually as it currently stands there are 17 entires and 3 of them are from a POV where the photographer is clearly not the owner of the feet. As I had also considered this an issue I will now disqualify them as well. Arguing over shoe coverings is taking things a little to far, but thanks for your imput.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2013 at 12:00 UTC
On Feet challenge (18 comments in total)

Even if I hadn't added my comment below, I would still disqualify all the entries (and there is a lot of them) that I have for not having fantastic/interesting background behind the feet and therefore not being on challenge theme. I'm sorry if you are offended by my decision but if I did nothing I would either have recieved a lot of complaints about not being diligent in my hosting duties, or I would have seen the majority of the disqualified entries come in at the end of the voting rank because the theme is not just about feet - but about having a fantastic background behind them. When entering images in a challenge you should ensure that your image meets all the criteria, not just one of them.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 12, 2013 at 23:01 UTC as 6th comment
On Feet challenge (18 comments in total)

Please don't post photos of just a foot, no matter how great it looks. I want to see some sort of tourist destination in the background behind your feet - such as some luxurious resort pool or stunning beach etc.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2013 at 01:48 UTC as 9th comment
On Snowy Landscapes challenge (3 comments in total)

I am sorry that you have missed out, but I wont be increasing the limit. There has been a lot of debate on the forums about trying to encourage people to vote on all images in a challenge, not just on their favourites, to make it as fair to everybody as possible, and one theory is that keeping entry limits at lower levels will help. I'm sure that this theory wont be popular with every body, but I have learnt that there is no pleasing everybody through these challenges:)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2013 at 19:12 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On Reflections in Christmas Ornaments challenge (2 comments in total)

I am happy with an indoor or an outdoor "room". The reflection has to be more than a posed object infront of the ornament. The image has to be close enough to be able to see the reflection without having to zoom in on the photo.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 29, 2011 at 20:34 UTC as 1st comment
On faces that fill the frame challenge (19 comments in total)
In reply to:

Leslee Dru: I am OK with being DQ'd 2x in this entry...but, in all fairness, Faces Filling the Frame usually mean forehead to chin....in my Laughing entry it was cropped tighter. I think maybe the rules should have state 'Faces Fill Frame - Skin Only!' Curious though...why is "Eyelashes" is still in this Challenge then with his snowy fur hat & collar, or "Makeup" where there is a mirror plus hands...or the photo with the "long beard?" Don't get me worng, I like those photos...I am just wondering how your elimination process works. I know this job must be thankless but I am just trying to figure it all out for future challenges. Thanks.

I reviewed the images you mentioned and did disqualify two of them. I left in the beard image as a beard has as much right to be in the photo as hair does. If I was to run this challenge again I would say skin only to make certain that people cropped in as close as I envisioned.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 22, 2011 at 12:32 UTC
On faces that fill the frame challenge (19 comments in total)

Actually I have disqualified more than 65% of the entries in this challenge. It would appear that stating that the face has to "fill the frame entirely" is not clear enough for some people. I'm actually being quite generous allowing 10% of the frame not to be part of the face/hair. I check entries and disqualify twice a day.

I have been called to task in the past for not enforcing my rules, now it would appear that I am being called to task for enforcing them. Mike Childs is right - hosting is a thankless task.

If you are struggling to get your face to fill the frame here are some tips:
* You do not have to crop in a 2:3 ratio.
* You can change a landscape image into a portrait image
* you can cut off the top/sides of the head
* If you can't make the face you are working on look good, find a different photo of a face to work with

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2011 at 21:21 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply
Total: 73, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »