Lives in United States AK, United States
Works as a student
Joined on May 6, 2007


Total: 96, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Samsung releases 12MP EX2F 'Smart Camera' article (370 comments in total)
In reply to:

Raed Ameen: hi .. is this enter-changable lens camera?


Direct link | Posted on Oct 10, 2012 at 15:21 UTC


thumbs up for Smartcams!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 1, 2012 at 18:35 UTC as 94th comment

i cant memorize the name "KLYP" ...
and the product is usless in my opinion...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2012 at 17:55 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

z9z9z9z9: Looking at the mode dial, it looks like this camera does NOT have AP or SP, just program, manual, and a bunch of scene modes.

Well what do you want with a 1/2,33" Sensor? F8, F16? Its going to be soft as hell.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2012 at 16:03 UTC
On Preview:canon-eos-650d-rebel-t4i (274 comments in total)
In reply to:

Brandy101: I need help making a decision. I was loving my t1i, but the continuous shoot mode just recently quit, so my warranty covered me getting either a credit of $750 or the t3i. I am an amateur and only use it for family purposes (dance, sports, my kids posing in general). I have taken multiple types of shots from regular photos to sports. I'm a little confused in whether or not to take the store credit and add to it to get the T4i or just stick with the T3i. I'm sorry if this sounds very unprofessional, but I am not a professional. ;)
So if someone could kindly give me some advice on which one would be the better choice for sports, family portraits, etc. it would be greatly appreciated!!
Also what would be a nice decently priced lens for sports?

The T4i is a little faster in Burst mode(5Fps vs. 3,7) and also in AF, because it has all crosstype Af- Points like the 60D (9 crosstype Points vs. 1).
I would prefere the T4i for sports...
If you only ned a light tele (for closeups from a distance, in good light), the Canon Ef-s 55-250mm IS is a very good lens. Its sharp and has a Image Stabilisator. It's not that fast (F5,6) and AF is ok too. But it only cost like 199$.
Best for Sports, but more expensive is eighter a Fast Tele lens (F2,8) or a Prime Lense (E.g. 85mm F1,8 or 100mm F2.0).
I hope, this helps...

Posted on Aug 8, 2012 at 16:20 UTC
In reply to:

malcolm82: Again with a horrible F1.4 lens.
A camera this size with a normal zoom should have an aps-c sensor with a lens of around F3.5-5.6 such as the standard zooms on interchangeable lens camera's.

Just look at the size of the panasonic powerzoom lens:

Its total length looks about 32mm so it can easily collapse in a camera size much smaller than this one.

A micro four thirds sensor would be ok for a camera this size with a 5x zoom lens or for a much smaller camera with shorter zoom range but for this size with 3-4x zoom it really should be aps-c.

@Timmbits: the LX7 has a physically larger lens opening than the M4/3 Kits!
You can calculate it like this:
actual Focal length/aperture nr.= actual size of aperture.
LX7: 17.7mm /F2,3 = 7.7mm
M4/3: 42mm /F5,6 = 7.5mm !

Direct link | Posted on Jul 18, 2012 at 15:21 UTC

I'll buy one!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2012 at 22:10 UTC as 27th comment
On Hunter in the Insects, in Their Natural Environment. challenge (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

Erland Nielsen: Natural enviroment ? Looks like a photo taken inside a studio.

the speediest? also the lasyest! once they sit down, you can take like 20-30 pictures of them if you dont move to fast!
With the P&S I've managed to take a picture of one just 1cm away. :-)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2012 at 21:07 UTC
On Concert Footage from Nokia 808 Pureview article (256 comments in total)

Nokia, put Android or Windows Phone in this phone and you're good to go!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 13, 2012 at 05:48 UTC as 64th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

happypoppeye: Whats a 1/1.2 sensor that big or small, I have no idea...

1/1.2 sensor is by far the biggest Phone-sensor.
Normal Smartphones have a 1/2,5" sensor.

The new sensor has a aprox. 6times bigger surface area.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2012 at 22:00 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: you might as well get a point and shoot, when you are going to use lenses like this one

300$ for a DSLR with THIS lens, I belive *Greg VdB3* is dreaming...
But you asked for an alternative:
Fujifilm FinePix X-S1.
It only lacks the optical viewfinder and a little low light capabilities...

Direct link | Posted on Jun 15, 2012 at 09:39 UTC
On ISO_12800 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Can't tell if it's better than the 600D or 7D...

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2012 at 00:00 UTC as 1st comment
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

sir_bazz: Offer less features + charge more than the competition = Canon's recipe for success.

At least Canon added something to the MkIII that we haven't seen on a DSLR for some time.......mushy jpegs.

BTW: more MP itn't a feature...
And the MkIII has the best AF on the market today.
You should shoot RAW anyway for best quality.
Jpeg's only get Mushy from ISO 12800 upwards...

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2012 at 13:44 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): Absolutely gutless. $3500 and a sensor older than I am. On the other hand, incredulity will wear off quickly, and DPR can move on to the next order of business. If they had given it 81 or 83 this would drag out forever, and I don't think the DPR reviewers are up for that. Onward, valiant steeds! Shelter by nightfall!

"and a sensor older than I am" are you like one year old? :-P

Direct link | Posted on May 23, 2012 at 08:11 UTC
In reply to:

justmeMN: If you want a viewfinder, the Sony FDA-EV1S is an additional $ 349 .99.

For people who use viewfinders, entry level DSLRs are a better value.

True story!
Nothing better than an optical Viewfinder.
BTW, I liked the Rebels very much, the IQ is exellent.
They are not big. I even think they are too small...

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2012 at 05:29 UTC
On Antennas in the Macro challenge (3 comments in total)

a May beetle! Great shot! Wow!

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2012 at 20:36 UTC as 1st comment
On Just Posted: In-depth Nikon D800 review article (541 comments in total)

The Nokia has a higher resolution! LOL

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2012 at 13:47 UTC as 82nd comment | 1 reply
On Nikon D3200 preview (181 comments in total)

Wow, the old Canon EOS 600D is as good with 18 MP!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 28, 2012 at 19:50 UTC as 40th comment | 3 replies
On gets mobile article (110 comments in total)
In reply to:

SonyA77: Great mobile site but you need iphone app too..

and Android... ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 7, 2012 at 22:46 UTC
In reply to:

aerorail: can someone explain to me this apple thing...i don't get it
nevermind it won't make sense no matter what is written

minimal improvements since electronics are having a hard time finding new things that make sense same as phones and tv

QUICK run out and buy one!!

Lol, Canon just realized that more mexapixel isn't needed. But image quality is always welcome!
But you only saw the MP count and where disapointed... tsts.
Best thing ever on the 5D MKIII is the AF! It's killer!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 7, 2012 at 22:43 UTC
Total: 96, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »