Lives in United States United States
Joined on Aug 15, 2007


Total: 133, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (782 comments in total)

bottom line hassy is an expensive system. One mediocre lens over $2K?

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2016 at 21:16 UTC as 38th comment | 2 replies
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1084 comments in total)

D500 should outsell D5, 500 to 5.

Link | Posted on May 25, 2016 at 21:19 UTC as 139th comment | 4 replies

What, iPhone 6+ isn't on the list? It was the first iPhone with the largest screen.

Link | Posted on May 7, 2016 at 03:28 UTC as 26th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

bgbs: There is about a 1stop difference between D5 and 1DXII at high ISO.

no, i mean raws. check again.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2016 at 16:20 UTC

There is about a 1stop difference between D5 and 1DXII at high ISO.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2016 at 16:03 UTC as 108th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

Solar Climber: The skin tone difference is interesting and it's certainly less appealing to my eyes. Sure, you can adjust it to your liking, but awesome color is what Canon is known for. It's nice to have that right out of camera.

Nikon and Canon have switched sides. Canon shooters will be jumping ship to Nikon for better skin tones and crappy DR, and Nikon shooters will be jumping to Canon for more DR.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2016 at 15:57 UTC
On article Making a splash: Nikon D500 real-world sample gallery (228 comments in total)

I'm glad to know my ancient D700 does just as good as the latest cameras. I have no reason to upgrade after looking at D500 and D5 images.

Link | Posted on May 3, 2016 at 19:51 UTC as 40th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

tongki: Now we know,
Canon used to photograph people for skin tone

Nikon are great to photograph aliens, then

For some reason I can always tell the shots of earth are taken by Nikon.

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2016 at 19:26 UTC
On article Hands on with the Hasselblad H6D 50c/100c (268 comments in total)

What's worse? Paying a criminal price for this camera, or taking off with one without paying for it?

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2016 at 03:53 UTC as 41st comment | 4 replies
On article Hands on with the Hasselblad H6D 50c/100c (268 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ayoh: Aesthetically this looks like it was designed in the early 1990's. The tacky gray rubber along with the embossed "H" on the lens really sums up the cheese

Yep, the design along should merit a discount on this camera.

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2016 at 03:48 UTC
On article Hands on with the Hasselblad H6D 50c/100c (268 comments in total)

Well, what can I add of substance to this conversation? The camera looks too bulky for my liking.

Link | Posted on Apr 12, 2016 at 18:58 UTC as 58th comment
In reply to:

Al Valentino: Few advertisments ever make me lust for a camera, this one does. I love to photograph landscapes and high dynamic range and old fashion, tripod mounting... This camera would fit that bill and never feel the need for more. Although i think 50mp would be plenty and wish that had the 15 stop DR like the 100mp version - buth that's how they get you!

Sadly, that is just a dream since i have tiny pockets :)

time to start a kick starter campaign.

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2016 at 20:42 UTC

So, this camera costs $330 per megapixel for H6D-100c and $520 per megapixel for H6D-50c. I'd say 100c is a much better deal.

The better question is, is each pixel gold plated on this thing?

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2016 at 20:40 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply

nice camera, but I don't need it.

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2016 at 20:33 UTC as 58th comment | 2 replies
On article Nikon D5 real-world low light, high ISO samples (281 comments in total)

I love the last image with 3.2million ISO. It looks like an expressionist painting.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2016 at 16:22 UTC as 20th comment

Verdict: Canon 80D does better in DR than D5

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2016 at 15:44 UTC as 59th comment | 3 replies

Folks, please come down. As always, D5s will address your gripes with D5.

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2016 at 19:50 UTC as 56th comment

D4s and D5 pretty much go head to head until ISO 400K

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2016 at 16:38 UTC as 93rd comment

awesome deal, no matter what happens in the future.

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 19:28 UTC as 69th comment
In reply to:

Interestingness: This should put it into perspective for you closed minded people, yippers, trolls and attention mongers. 80D isn't listed yet so I picked the 7Dii, D7200 and OMD E-M5ii. Based on what we know about the 80d with much better low ISO DR then the gaps will be closer.,Nikon%20D7200,Olympus%20OM-D%20E-M5%20Mark%20II

What this tells me is on a tripod at base ISO, the D7200 has the most dynamic range by 1.5 stops over the OMD and 2 over the 7Dii. Fair enough. At ISO 200 it shrinks to 1/2 a stop for E-M5ii and 1.5 for the 7Dii. At 400 ISO it's just over 1/2 stop over the 7Dii and a rounding error to the E-M5ii. After 400ISO it's not relevant and the measurebators will notice the D7200 falls behind the 7Dii at high ISO. Big whoop.

Most of us try to shoot at the lowest ISO values possible for IQ reasons. I suspect for most people base ISO DR is of the most importance.

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2016 at 19:38 UTC
Total: 133, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »