Syriac

Syriac

Joined on Oct 5, 2011

Comments

Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Review preview (821 comments in total)
In reply to:

dutch3dmaster: First impression; well built camera with loads of features and options. 4K time-lapse. WOW! Received it just in time for the holiday season :-)

Hi Dutch

Congrats.

On my earlier question. What is your workflow when setting the correct shutter speed in video mode? Do you leave the top dial to 30/60p and then use the back dial to change it to 25/50p.

Or do you leave top dial it in A mode and then use only the back dial to set correct shutter speed.

Seems to me a very poor implementation or a massive miss not to have the right shutter speed intervals for each region.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 13, 2014 at 08:17 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Review preview (821 comments in total)
In reply to:

Syriac: I noticed on the shutter dial that the intervals are 30, 60 and 125.

Shooting video in 4k PAL mode (25p) the "proper" shutter speed should be 50 or in 1080 PAL mode (50p) should have a shutter speed 100.

Does the LX100 sold in PAL regions have a different shutter intervals or are the all the same? or did I miss something here?

Ok, so the top shutter dial is for pictures and rear shutter dial is for movie mode?

Does this also mean that the top dial increments is the same for PAL and NTSC cameras?

This is insane! How could Panasonic miss this? Also I did not notice this was mentioned in the review.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2014 at 09:11 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Review preview (821 comments in total)

I noticed on the shutter dial that the intervals are 30, 60 and 125.

Shooting video in 4k PAL mode (25p) the "proper" shutter speed should be 50 or in 1080 PAL mode (50p) should have a shutter speed 100.

Does the LX100 sold in PAL regions have a different shutter intervals or are the all the same? or did I miss something here?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2014 at 21:13 UTC as 22nd comment | 3 replies
On Nikon unveils 24.1MP D5200 DSLR with optional Wi-Fi article (392 comments in total)
In reply to:

ThomasSwitzerland: I am fully satisfied with my D5100, still having another D5000 as backup and second camera for telephotos in order not to change lenses. I would not buy the D5200.

I do not see a mandatory upgrade. But, for someone not having this line of cameras, the D5200 will be very interesting, worth buying.

To me, the 5000er series has excellent weight and ergonomic handling, and you get fantastic pictures. Over the many decades, from analogue to digital, Nikon seemed the right long term choice for me. I am not a Nikon fan as I use so many makes. Just a statement from an investment point of view.

Guidenet,
Many thanks for the suggestions.
My understanding these are FX lenses?
That would mean we are looking at , 36ish , 52ish and 42ish focal length?

The question here would be if one invests in these great lenses...is it a better deal to buy a used D700 for the price of the D3200?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 16:55 UTC
On Nikon unveils 24.1MP D5200 DSLR with optional Wi-Fi article (392 comments in total)
In reply to:

ThomasSwitzerland: I am fully satisfied with my D5100, still having another D5000 as backup and second camera for telephotos in order not to change lenses. I would not buy the D5200.

I do not see a mandatory upgrade. But, for someone not having this line of cameras, the D5200 will be very interesting, worth buying.

To me, the 5000er series has excellent weight and ergonomic handling, and you get fantastic pictures. Over the many decades, from analogue to digital, Nikon seemed the right long term choice for me. I am not a Nikon fan as I use so many makes. Just a statement from an investment point of view.

What lenses are you using.
I am looking for wide, 24mm (or 28) prime with f-stop of 2 or better. For the life of me I could not find it.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 11:55 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Preview preview (178 comments in total)
In reply to:

Yehuda_: The statement about the LX7 lens being faster than the XZ-1 is not accurate.

The XZ-1 starts at F1.8@28mm (effective), reaches F2@60mm and by 90mm it's at F2.2.
The LX7 starts faster F1.4@24mm and reaches F2.3@90mm.
I don't know how fast it loses the F1.4.

Anyway this is really splitting hairs - Both cameras are much the same lens speed.

Regarding the much talked about Sony RX-100 - the lack of a hotshoe is a real deal killer imho. External flash bounced off the ceiling yields much cleaner, nicer, higher quality images(you can stay at ISO 100) allows much faster shooting, freezing kids running indoors.
This holds true regardless of your system (be it an LX7, CSC camera or the best DSLR).
I wrote a post about it in the past.
Google "xz-1 + yinyan cy20 = fun" and you'll see what I mean.

And another point - I wish people stop comparing the S100/RX100 to the XZ-1/LX7 cameras. The slow lens @ tele renders the S100 et al as very slow lensed cameras (with no external flash to compensate)

I have the Sony RX-100 and you can bounce the flash.

It is flexible and with your left index finger you can easy bend it backward and the flash bounce. If you increase flash compensation to +2 it works really good. I use it all the time.
(similar flash to NEX-7)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 18, 2012 at 09:16 UTC
Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6