Wubslin

Wubslin

Lives in United Kingdom London, United Kingdom
Works as a Ship's Engineer
Has a website at www.saynotophotography.net
Joined on Jun 22, 2008

Comments

Total: 58, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On Niko announces service advisory for D810 'bright spots' article (378 comments in total)

It must be OK for Nikon to delivery faulty products... that's the impression I'm getting from reading all the fevered comments supporting them.

Here's a tip: why doesn't Nikon try *not* delivering faulty products, and then maybe they'll be taken seriously?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 30, 2014 at 10:37 UTC as 1st comment
On Nikon D810: A sport photographer's impressions article (231 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: compared to what? " I think you force use D810 in indoor sports photography."
The IQ in d810 is better at 25600iso than canon 6D at 25600iso
and 6D is better than 5dmk3, not bad for a camera with highest resolution, best DR at base iso and now also good as or even better than 5dmk3 , 6D at 25600iso, just finished a test between my 6D and d810
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/54214812

Ps how often do you use 25600iso when you are shooting indoors sport?
.

I know someone shooting roller derby (indoors, fast action, poor lighting) who would definitely be interested.

But he still uses Canon... I wonder why that would be.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 24, 2014 at 17:58 UTC
On Niko announces service advisory for D810 'bright spots' article (378 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: Well this is just awful.

I've assured, *repeatedly*, by everyone on this site that Nikon never has any issues.

So I'm sure it must be some kind of misunderstanding, and all those images published on the internet showing sensor defects are just Photoshops.

@sandy b: So you didn't need any help moving those goalposts then? Nice diversion, Nikon must be getting their money's worth.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2014 at 19:37 UTC
On Niko announces service advisory for D810 'bright spots' article (378 comments in total)

Well this is just awful.

I've assured, *repeatedly*, by everyone on this site that Nikon never has any issues.

So I'm sure it must be some kind of misunderstanding, and all those images published on the internet showing sensor defects are just Photoshops.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2014 at 11:41 UTC as 10th comment | 3 replies
On Nikon D810: A sport photographer's impressions article (231 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: No. Still not buying one. Not impressed at all.

Does it even focus properly, or is this miracle of technology too far beyond Nikon?

@Eyeglass10101: Nikon's AF may be terminally broken but my sarcasm detector is in perfect working order.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 17, 2014 at 14:36 UTC
On Nikon D810: A sport photographer's impressions article (231 comments in total)

No. Still not buying one. Not impressed at all.

Does it even focus properly, or is this miracle of technology too far beyond Nikon?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 16, 2014 at 18:06 UTC as 11th comment | 4 replies

Reported.

Good luck with the trial.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 11, 2014 at 18:33 UTC as 9th comment
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1505 comments in total)
In reply to:

beavertown: What a joke, Nikon can't even produce its sensors.

@sandy b: Didn't you know that beavertown produces his own sensors? He has a workshop in his garage he uses to make everything he needs from raw elements instead of buying things from other people like a total loser.

Why can't you do that?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 27, 2014 at 14:57 UTC
On Ricoh announces Pentax K-3 Prestige Edition article (165 comments in total)

Very nice indeed. I've always liked Pentaxes.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 25, 2014 at 12:38 UTC as 6th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Review preview (629 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: I owned a Panasonic camera once and it made me give up photography.

@BJN: It's not as fun as my new Nikon D810 will be.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 25, 2014 at 09:59 UTC
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2300 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jim Salvas: They got this wrong from the unboxing. You're not supposed to unbox a Leica. It's a collectible. It doesn't even have to work.

Unboxing it would reduce its value. Like those collectible figurines of various characters from SF/fantasy franchises.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2014 at 19:17 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Review preview (629 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: I owned a Panasonic camera once and it made me give up photography.

@caver3d: You don't get it, do you? Every comment I read on this simply makes me despise photographers even more. No wonder I quit, I'm glad I'm no longer one of you.

And your reply to Biological_Viewfinder was just insulting and unhelpful.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2014 at 22:17 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Review preview (629 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: I owned a Panasonic camera once and it made me give up photography.

@Artpt: Thanks, it's just not really my thing at the moment though.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2014 at 21:21 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Review preview (629 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: I owned a Panasonic camera once and it made me give up photography.

Thanks for your insulting and inappropriate comment. It really added to the discussion.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2014 at 21:08 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Review preview (629 comments in total)

I owned a Panasonic camera once and it made me give up photography.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2014 at 20:48 UTC as 175th comment | 22 replies
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1505 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ramjager: A stronger opponent with the 5DMk3 in terms of Autofocus?
You mean the Nikon AF system works this time or is it still sharp on the right soft on the left?
Funny how in the DPR D800 review no mention was made of the poor AF and QC issues which plagued the D800 bodies.
How many people went through multiple bodies to get one good one that had an AF system half as good as Canons...lots.
Yet hey it had 36MP its the king.
Your kidding yourseld DPR thinking some actually read and take your reviews seriously until you start reviewing properly and thoroughly.
But hey its got 36.3 MP and made by Nikon it must be good..right?

@DaveE1: I didn't know I had to be a Canon owner to criticise Nikon for their many failings.

But since I don't own anything by Canon your attempt at diversion has failed.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 5, 2014 at 08:43 UTC
In reply to:

Wubslin: Another failure from Nikon. I guess I should be disappointed, but I can't even muster disappointment any more.

How Nikon are still in business is a mystery.

@HowaboutRAW: You're going to have to drop it, because I am not going to waste any more time explaining things to you.

Also, this constant attention is getting creepy.

Just saying.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 1, 2014 at 20:14 UTC
In reply to:

Wubslin: Another failure from Nikon. I guess I should be disappointed, but I can't even muster disappointment any more.

How Nikon are still in business is a mystery.

@HowaboutRAW: I'm not sure what to say to that. You seem very keen for me to explain why I hate Nikon so much and will never buy any of their products. May I ask if you have some kind of motive beyond mere curiosity? Because it's beginning to seem that way, and quite frankly I'm finding it a bit uncomfortable.

Come to think of it, your username is familiar to me. I recall we have had a similar conversation before; during which you also pursued me, questioning my dislike for Nikon to what I thought was a rather excessive degree.

Far be it from me to offer advice but maybe it's time you dropped the subject.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 1, 2014 at 18:30 UTC
In reply to:

Wubslin: Another failure from Nikon. I guess I should be disappointed, but I can't even muster disappointment any more.

How Nikon are still in business is a mystery.

@HowaboutRAW: And how about the first part of my reply where I said "It's a Nikon, 'nuff said" in response to your first question "Why is the D810 a "failure"?"

If you can't even be bothered reading what I write, why should I bother?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 1, 2014 at 14:33 UTC
In reply to:

Wubslin: Another failure from Nikon. I guess I should be disappointed, but I can't even muster disappointment any more.

How Nikon are still in business is a mystery.

@HowaboutRAW: Again, you have deliberately ignored my reply to your question and then pretended it doesn't exist.

I see no purpose in continuing this discussion.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 1, 2014 at 11:43 UTC
Total: 58, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »