Wubslin

Wubslin

Lives in United Kingdom London, United Kingdom
Works as a Ship's Engineer
Has a website at www.saynotophotography.net
Joined on Jun 22, 2008

Comments

Total: 72, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1434 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: Articulated LCD panel on a 'serious' camera body?

Someone stick a fork in Nikon, they're done.

@Hans I have considered not buying a Nikon and found that much more preferable.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2014 at 21:35 UTC
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1434 comments in total)

Articulated LCD panel on a 'serious' camera body?

Someone stick a fork in Nikon, they're done.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 12, 2014 at 19:07 UTC as 21st comment | 3 replies
On Relio is a powerful LED light in your pocket post (22 comments in total)

Oooooh, a portable white LED. Amazing.

No-one has ever thought of such a thing before.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 12:39 UTC as 5th comment | 2 replies
On Enthusiast interchangeable lens camera 2013 roundup article (468 comments in total)

Great, a list of things not to consider buying.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2014 at 20:58 UTC as 47th comment | 1 reply
On A second glance: two takes on the Leica X article (386 comments in total)

You didn't take it out of the packaging, did you...?

Now most of its value is gone!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2014 at 12:40 UTC as 64th comment
In reply to:

Wubslin: Can anyone explain why they should be able to take advantage of something paid for by all taxpayers, and turn a profit only for themselves?

@Lensmate: I don't take pictures. Why would I do something like that?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2014 at 17:51 UTC
In reply to:

Wubslin: Can anyone explain why they should be able to take advantage of something paid for by all taxpayers, and turn a profit only for themselves?

@Graham: They're still exploiting taxpayer-funded resources for their own profit.

Why should my taxes subsidise someone else's business?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 10, 2014 at 14:07 UTC
In reply to:

Wubslin: Can anyone explain why they should be able to take advantage of something paid for by all taxpayers, and turn a profit only for themselves?

'...the wilderness was not provided by the state or taxpayers - it is simply there...'

I see, so visitors don't require any services paid for by taxpayers, like parking, law enforcement or trail maintenance?

Because it seems like I can see lot of bootprints left by photographers.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 6, 2014 at 11:42 UTC

Can anyone explain why they should be able to take advantage of something paid for by all taxpayers, and turn a profit only for themselves?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 5, 2014 at 16:06 UTC as 12th comment | 7 replies
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1434 comments in total)
In reply to:

armandino: Is Nikon going to start making custom cameras for each photographer any time soon?

They could start by making ones worth buying. That would be nice.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 14, 2014 at 10:40 UTC
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1434 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: Articulating rear display. Now I know Nikon has totally lost it.

Goodbye structural integrity, here comes the latest me-too fashion craze.

@Galbertson: I'm still not interested, nor convinced, by Nikon's latest lump of shiny plastic.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 14, 2014 at 09:05 UTC
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1434 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: Articulating rear display. Now I know Nikon has totally lost it.

Goodbye structural integrity, here comes the latest me-too fashion craze.

@AshMills: If only Nikon could get those things to work then maybe I'd take them seriously.

As it is they're just a joke - not even a funny one.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 13, 2014 at 21:40 UTC
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1434 comments in total)

Articulating rear display. Now I know Nikon has totally lost it.

Goodbye structural integrity, here comes the latest me-too fashion craze.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 13, 2014 at 20:21 UTC as 193rd comment | 8 replies
On Nikon D810: A sport photographer's impressions article (249 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: No. Still not buying one. Not impressed at all.

Does it even focus properly, or is this miracle of technology too far beyond Nikon?

@tbcass: Hardly. I don't have a digital camera, and wouldn't consider buying a Canon either. Keep playing though, it's fun.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 13, 2014 at 20:15 UTC
On Niko announces service advisory for D810 'bright spots' article (379 comments in total)

It must be OK for Nikon to delivery faulty products... that's the impression I'm getting from reading all the fevered comments supporting them.

Here's a tip: why doesn't Nikon try *not* delivering faulty products, and then maybe they'll be taken seriously?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 30, 2014 at 10:37 UTC as 2nd comment
On Nikon D810: A sport photographer's impressions article (249 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: compared to what? " I think you force use D810 in indoor sports photography."
The IQ in d810 is better at 25600iso than canon 6D at 25600iso
and 6D is better than 5dmk3, not bad for a camera with highest resolution, best DR at base iso and now also good as or even better than 5dmk3 , 6D at 25600iso, just finished a test between my 6D and d810
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/54214812

Ps how often do you use 25600iso when you are shooting indoors sport?
.

I know someone shooting roller derby (indoors, fast action, poor lighting) who would definitely be interested.

But he still uses Canon... I wonder why that would be.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 24, 2014 at 17:58 UTC
On Niko announces service advisory for D810 'bright spots' article (379 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: Well this is just awful.

I've assured, *repeatedly*, by everyone on this site that Nikon never has any issues.

So I'm sure it must be some kind of misunderstanding, and all those images published on the internet showing sensor defects are just Photoshops.

@sandy b: So you didn't need any help moving those goalposts then? Nice diversion, Nikon must be getting their money's worth.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2014 at 19:37 UTC
On Niko announces service advisory for D810 'bright spots' article (379 comments in total)

Well this is just awful.

I've assured, *repeatedly*, by everyone on this site that Nikon never has any issues.

So I'm sure it must be some kind of misunderstanding, and all those images published on the internet showing sensor defects are just Photoshops.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2014 at 11:41 UTC as 11th comment | 3 replies
On Nikon D810: A sport photographer's impressions article (249 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wubslin: No. Still not buying one. Not impressed at all.

Does it even focus properly, or is this miracle of technology too far beyond Nikon?

@Eyeglass10101: Nikon's AF may be terminally broken but my sarcasm detector is in perfect working order.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 17, 2014 at 14:36 UTC
On Nikon D810: A sport photographer's impressions article (249 comments in total)

No. Still not buying one. Not impressed at all.

Does it even focus properly, or is this miracle of technology too far beyond Nikon?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 16, 2014 at 18:06 UTC as 15th comment | 6 replies
Total: 72, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »