zapatista

Seems to me the D600 w/35mm Sigma is just as valid as your pics. Quite simply, the 35mm Sigma is a better lens than the 23mm Fuji. It should be for the price and size.

I know, stayed up all night and can't decide between this lens or an FZ200.

Brass Olympus

In 9 months when it's selling for $149, I'd buy one.

Just curious, what lens(es) are you using to shoot wildlife?

That's cos max is an idiot.

On another subject, who the hell is paying almost $600k for a picture of a crappy tricycle.

On another subject, who the hell is paying almost $600k for an inkjet print-film scan of a tricycle.

What I'd love is to see just ONE of these "crop sensor" comment discussions go on without some dumbass equivocating DoF to full frame. JUST ONE.

I don't have the 18mm, but the 18-55mm is excellent. Pretty much EVERY review states similiar conclusions. Where are all the doubters?!?

1234

Wow, I didn't know that f2.8=f4.5. :P

Seems to me you like to WHINE to WHINE.

Well, the E-PM2 also has a crap LCD and ineffective IBIS.

Well, the E-PM2 also has a crap fixed LCD and ineffective IBIS.

Well, Panasonic for better or worse has decided not to take on Sony--"maybe the best answer is a small sensor and bright lens".

Troll's arrogance and pretension best serves troll's head further up own rectum.

If this was a Leica "design" Panasonic would be promoting it up the wazoo and charge twice the price. Similar to the price for the 25mm f1.4 lens compared to the FF equivalents when it 1st came out...

Dang, I wish Sigma would come out with two similarly bright excellent lenses for about half the price.

I stopped reading right there.