pomoville

Photo sites should ban the word yawn. It seems to be the most frequently expressed sentiment, and, ironically, one of the most exhausting.

In general I found Fuji did pretty well launching this system with a fairly solid assortment of lenses. There's only so much they can do at one time. It's already a drastically more appealing...

Sure, but that didn't happen in 2012.

If you can't get the GH2, you're better off with GH1 over GX1, G5, or GF5, etc, if video is what you're interested in.

Camera phones are getting better, but they will never approach this kind of versatility. I've never had a super-zoom but the recent pack have a lot to like about them. I don't mind lack of DOF...

Compactness. I doubt it takes a great deal of energy, I don't mind less than exciting lenses as long as they keep on putting cool ones out there.

One lens that could definitely use a revamp is...

All three of the cameras you mentioned started at $500. I agree about competition changing with the RX100, though I think the speedy lens on here makes up some of the ground.

Leica makes nice cameras, but this is condescending, man. It's not necessary to criticize people for not being rich.