3a

Has a website at anoop.co
Joined on Oct 3, 2011

Comments

Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Sordid: I consider all filters but ND and polarizers quite obsolete these days.

:)

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2013 at 02:33 UTC
In reply to:

StephenSPhotog: I'd love to see more companies move some of their variable aperture lenses from 3.5-5.6 to the 2.8-4 territory.

3.5-5.6 are the cheap lenses which beginners buy. if manufactures move the 18-55s and 18-105s to 2.8-4 range, the price goes up and it wont be appealing to beginners anymore.

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2013 at 19:44 UTC
In reply to:

StephenSPhotog: I'd love to see more companies move some of their variable aperture lenses from 3.5-5.6 to the 2.8-4 territory.

i guess u would want the price range to stay @ 100-200$s too.

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2013 at 05:54 UTC
In reply to:

Photonix: From the information available it appears that the "Sport" version of the 120-300mm uses exactly the same glass, coatings, and optical formula as the lens it replaces. As best I can tell, here are the differences:

New external cosmetic treatment (S badge, smoother body lines, different finish treatment)
New foot design.
Compatibility with USB Dock (tweak focus, set focus limit, focus speed, OS mode)
New external switch than can be configured with software.

I am not sure I would pay $600 for these new features when the prior version can be had for $3K and deliver identical image quality (which I can say first hand is extremely good). I am pleased to see Sigma starting to produce some really fine glass and give the big boys something to think about. Can't wait to see how this lens with a 1.4x teleconverter compares to Canon's new $11,000 200-400mm f/4.

For the price, sigma delivers one heck of optical quality. by the new lineup, if they have improved the overall quality and reliability its gonna be a winner. i hope the price goes to the 3K$ range.

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2013 at 05:52 UTC

DPR, any update on AEB capability ? what a waste of such high frame rate uif bracketing is not included.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2012 at 02:49 UTC as 50th comment
In reply to:

Francis Carver: "Nikon creates 10.5mm F1.8 fast prime lens for 1 system mirrorless cameras

Nikon has announced the 1 Nikkor 18.5mm F1.8 fast 'normal' prime lens for its 1 system mirrorless cameras. The 18.5mm lens offers a field of view equivalent to that of a 50mm lens on a full-frame camera."

Looks like it is a nifty new zoom lens from Nikon. Apparently it goes from 10.5mm to 18.5mm -- at least, the title states one focal length, the text another. The photo shows "18.5mm," so maybe it's that?

A bit confusing, nonetheless.

DPR. please correct it :)

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2012 at 04:41 UTC

nikon 10-24 is 3.5 @ 10mm, have zoom, take filters and is priced decently at 800$. To beat that and make users buy this instead, samyang have to price this lens that much competitively.
i believe, Samysng's profit is in the quantity sold and not margin on a lens. they should try to make cheap alternative of costly lenses. (like their huge hits. 85mm, 14mm, etc)
i just got the 85mm and i love it !!

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2012 at 02:27 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply

tamron... price it competitively and i am getting one.
current tamron 70-200 F2.8 is 770$. i would say around 1K to 1.2K would be a good deal.

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2012 at 21:23 UTC as 43rd comment
On article Just Posted: Hands-on Nikon D600 preview (376 comments in total)
In reply to:

CameraLabTester: How to slot this camera in the Nikon pricing hierarchy will be a real challenge.

Right now, the cost of this camera cannot really be called "budget" or "cheap".

.

i feel its real cheap considering its a Full frame.
cant expect 1.5+ k range for a full frame in another one or two years i guess.
think of RX1 @ 3000+ (camera, grip, viewfinder ,etc) and u have some solid money in hand for a decent prime and still have a DSLR :)

having said that its really not cheap for 'me' and i dont see replacing my D300s anytime sooner :)

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2012 at 04:26 UTC
In reply to:

K_Photo_Teach: can it take teleconverters???

yes, you might be able to attach those screw in TCs :)

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2012 at 14:31 UTC

seeing the price, i will just pass this. way out of budget. i will wait for Sony to release another RX with APS-C sensor and a 30mm F1.4 at aound 1000$ :)

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2012 at 14:28 UTC as 107th comment
On article Carl Zeiss announces CP.2 25mm T2.1 fast cinema prime (38 comments in total)
In reply to:

falconeyes: To anybody in the knows ...

I've got a question: Why is it that cine lenses (in general, and from Zeiss, comparing their cine and SLR offerings in particular) are much more expensive than SLR lenses -- while at the same time, the resolution requirement for cine lenses must be on the lower end even considering 4k video, i.e. 8MP?

declicked aperture, transmission stops, low production volumes, high purchasing power of the targeted buyers... etc etc i guess :)

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2012 at 16:18 UTC
On article Just Posted: Sony Alpha NEX-5R hands-on preview (127 comments in total)
In reply to:

OutOfFocus student: I wonder if they finally fixed the single biggest disgrace of 5n: the lack of AutoISO for the manual mode? Without this mode the use of fast E-mount lenses is crippled (e.g. shooting at 1/125 and F2 in changing lighting conditions is a great pain since ISO needs to adjusted all the time manually).

i dont need AutoISO in the Manual mode in any camera. thats why its called Manual mode i guess.

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 17:15 UTC

Minimum shutter speed - 4 sec, Maximum shutter speed - 1/1500 sec ... seriously ?

Link | Posted on Aug 23, 2012 at 04:16 UTC as 84th comment
In reply to:

3a: i may sound naive,
why does Olympus lenses (say 300 F2.8), which just have to cover half the image circle of a Full frame counterpart be this heavy (i guess 400gm more than nikon) and this costly (almost 1000+$ more) ?
i guess if Olympus had invested in making smaller and lower cost lenses (with similar quality), once they stopped making Film cameras, they would have been a more popular brand now.
i guess i made the right choice of moving from E-30 to D300s, even-though i was not dissatisfied with E-30.

i guess i failed to convey my point.
lets say which lenses are the more popular with CaNikon ...
i will say its cheap to moderately costly lenses like 50mm F1.8, 400 F5.6, 300 F4, 100-400 etc. there is nothing in Oly lineup which can match the price-quality combo of the same. Oly either have super quality super costly F2 and F2.8 lenses or cheaper 5.6 lenses.

i was just trying to say why i moved out.
Atleast if Sigma continued making FT lenses, there would be more people following Olympus.

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2012 at 23:30 UTC

i may sound naive,
why does Olympus lenses (say 300 F2.8), which just have to cover half the image circle of a Full frame counterpart be this heavy (i guess 400gm more than nikon) and this costly (almost 1000+$ more) ?
i guess if Olympus had invested in making smaller and lower cost lenses (with similar quality), once they stopped making Film cameras, they would have been a more popular brand now.
i guess i made the right choice of moving from E-30 to D300s, even-though i was not dissatisfied with E-30.

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2012 at 19:13 UTC as 68th comment | 7 replies

its too early to thrash a new system. as the system and sensor evolves, i guess, nikon 1 will supplement a pro shooter well along with his/her DSLR.
lets wait for fast primes and light weight telephotos. till then i am not buying it ;)
and i really dont want more then 10 or 12 MP in my camera. and i think 99% of world's photographers doesnt need it on a regular basis.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2012 at 22:25 UTC as 32nd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Thanatham Piriyakarnjanakul: I love this video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFCsy2uVnfU

as the system and sensor evolves, i guess, nikon 1 will supplement a pro shooter well along with his/her DSLR.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2012 at 22:20 UTC

Unless its weight is lesser than Canon counterpart, Nikon will have to lower the price very much to get market. Canon have been doing exceptionally well to lower the weights of their super teles.

Link | Posted on Jul 12, 2012 at 15:35 UTC as 34th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon significantly improves EOS 7D with firmware v2 (296 comments in total)

Auto Exposure Bracketing is still 3 images :(
when i saw '... significantly improves ...' i expected a better AEB for HDR shooters.

Link | Posted on Jun 28, 2012 at 04:56 UTC as 122nd comment | 2 replies
Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »