LuW: This Fuji xt10 ia a tiny camera OMD size. The photo pictured I think it has the 56mm mounted. All I can say is you better have a strong wrist or use it two handed. I had one for 4 days with a 35mm mounted and it just became to much to hold because there is just no grip? Very front heavy. Not with my medium to large hands. It has great image quality high ISo capabilities just like the big brother and so so reliable focusing. Before you buy if you can pick it up and feel it - I think the 27mm pancake would be a great lens but any other it just becomes unbalanced. Just an opinion with personal experience after owning the Fuji x100, x100s and x100T. I was so used to them that this was not my cup of tea. I returned it.
When handholding it with a heavy lens I hold it by the lens, not the body. So far it works just fine. I have tried it with the 16-55 monster on a tripod; it also works fine. Not a sign of strain of the heavy lens on the small body. Just plain good materials and manufacturing obviously. We have the X-T1 and X-E2; they are great. But this baby betters them. Give it a try before buying of course.
I like the last one, the shot with the girls and the poles. They look like sextuplets???
R N: The left eye of the left arm wrestler looks really odd. Overall a really nice job though!
Picky, picky, picky……..!
I have had the camera for the last five days and have used it profusely. My hands are not big or small, just normal. The camera is a joy to use. We are thoroughly happy with the results. We will getting another one for my wife; she cannot keep her mitts away! Used with the 18-55, results are outstanding, and easier to handle than the X-T1.
Two days ago, June 18, I got to B&H early in the morning and was able to get the new Fuji X-T10. After spending the day shooting with it I am happy to report the little thing is great. Incredible fast focus, wonderful colors, and sharp, sharp, sharp results. Friendly too. Without distracting features. Made for me.
Captain Hook: OMG! What have they done to the layout?!?Lots of space is now wasted! :-(I'm not happy. I'm using a dual screen high res (2560x1440) setup. But now lots of white spaces around my photostream. All waste... :-( I don't want that! I want efficient layout (= using entire screen) back.
Anyone knows how to restore and/or configure the layout of the flickr photostream screen?
I agree. A black background defines a picture look. A white background makes it look like cheap advertising, A really bad move, this change of background. Photoshop provides black background, and greys as you wish and feel comfortable with for creation.
JaimeA: We are in May; one third of the year has gone. Since the beginning of the year  Nikon has issued 16 new cameras, Canon 14; Sony only 2 and they are pockets cameras. What's happening? What gives? We have been using Sony cameras for a long time with spectacular results. This company has always been known for innovation in everything they make.Still waiting for the a7000!
I had the A7 before and now I have the A7II with the 24-70 Zeiss. This last combination is getting a bit heavy to carry all day in my traveling days. So I was looking forward to an unobtrusive small camera that won't alert the guards in interesting places. I do not need wall-size enlargements; a double-page magazine spread will do. At that scale it is not obvious which shot has been done with FF or DX. The NEX-7 and later the a6000 were very useful and racked thousands of images. We got everywhere with them and were the happiest. In former times I carried a Canon 1Dx and other heavies. Not any more, now that the quality of the sensors has gotten so good.
We are in May; one third of the year has gone. Since the beginning of the year  Nikon has issued 16 new cameras, Canon 14; Sony only 2 and they are pockets cameras. What's happening? What gives? We have been using Sony cameras for a long time with spectacular results. This company has always been known for innovation in everything they make.Still waiting for the a7000!
Does the D750 have the same terrific Time-Lapse feature found in the D610? It is so uncomplicated and ends up with good results.
The fellows who posted these shots really know how to find sexy guys. Congrats!
What is the weight of this lens? Here is another Fuji lens without stabilization. There are many occasions when the lens has to be stopped down for additional depth of field.
The reviewers apparently do not go to special events, such as outdoor music festivals or open air exhibitions. Many museums (e.g. the Louvre) and other cultural spots do not allow these sticks blocking or disrupting the view for everyone else. They seem to be always up and on, and in large groups; unavoidable. They are dangerous too, as they rob attention from the users. Pickpockets love them. What’s wrong with a raised arm or asking someone? Shame on DPR for mentioning, let alone recommending this awful nuisance.
It is hard to believe that in this time of advanced camera development this camera does not have stabilization of any kind.
Reinhard136: looks like a typo on one of the dates , the one with Jesus and his cross would have had to have been closer to ad 27 than 1827.
The raised index finger pointing up is the traditional Christian gesture meaning "going to heaven."
This shot is absolutely superb!! We could not take our eyes away from it. The colors are perfect. And so is the mood. (Not ruined by too much photoshop, as we see much too often.) Truly beautiful and evocative. Thanks for sharing.
bmwzimmer: A6000 is great for a small compact kit. It makes sense with a set of small fast primes or general purpose zoom. But it looks ludicrous mounted to the 70-200 and 100-400 w adaptor and is terribly unbalanced. The FE 70-200 f/4 is bigger and heavier than the Canon DSLR equivalent and the 100-400 plus adapter is about as heavy as a 100-400 mounted to a more ergonomically comfortable and balanced dslr. I really like the A6000 though. Best Mirrorless AF there is. I wonder how it compares to the Samsung NX1
Paradoxically, it is a big capable lens that happens to have a great recording instrument attached. Terrific. The a6000 has incredible capabilities. With good glass I'm super satisfied.
One can learn from this video much more than hours and hours with a manual. Exuberant feeling projected. Truly a great video. Thanks, DPReview!!!
I know several people who shoot only JPEG, for the reason that RAW is a bit complicated and entails large amounts of storage. RAW processing can also be highly subjective. Every samples gallery ought to have some samples in jpg, to keep everyone informed and happy. (Especially Fuji; famous for their great looking jpgs.)
Assignments are arriving for spring. We have seen work done with the D4S, Nikon’s flagship; it looks fantastic. We look forward to buying at least one. However, after a year in the market there is no in-depth DPR review of it. Nor was there one for its predecessor, the D4, a camera much heralded when it appeared in 2012 (a good but hurried 4-page “First Impressions” exists). A full review “is in the works.” It’s been 3 years! Instead one finds a plethora of news already featured in other sites. Incredible. And discouraging. No way to treat a faithful following.
Makes me want to return to my first true favorites, Canon 1Ds, 1DsII, and 1DsIII, after a long stint with other brands. Joins other masterpieces: 17mm PC (wow!) and 8-15mm Fisheye zoom (another wow!). Well done!!