Joined on May 26, 2011


Total: 238, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (674 comments in total)

Dx0 aren't reviewing this camera - "it's not in our road map". I suspect DPR won't either.

The biased review sites usually wait until their favoured brands bring out a competing product so they can dig the boot in don't they?

...just saying ;)

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2015 at 07:28 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
On Medium well done: Two takes on the Pentax 645Z article (249 comments in total)

It's now May 2015 and I read only a few minutes ago that Dx0 won't be testing this camera "for now" as "it's not in our Roadmap".

I'm pretty sure this camera would easily top their sensor ratings but we won't find out unfortunately.

And people wonder why Pentax enthusiasts think there's some kind of conspiracy.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2015 at 00:10 UTC as 6th comment
On Canon EOS 5DS R added to studio test scene comparison article (518 comments in total)
In reply to:

Neez: Actually, i'm impressed. Everyone was expecting high ISO to look really really bad, but i see puts the 5DSR in between APS-C and other Full frame cameras. The D810 looks only slightly better in High ISO noise at ISO 6400. But it's still better than the 645Z which is a medium format camera.

This camera should be great for studio shooting, and up to the level of full frame cameras in the 2008-2010ish year range in low light, which is still good depending on your needs.

What i'd like to see is a single shot HDR mode, where the camera takes half the pixels at 1 ISO and the other half at another ISO. You'd still get a 25mp still image with phenomenal dynamic range, and you can dot it at normal shutter speeds with no ghosting.

The 645Z is clearly better than all competitors at high ISO and retains details that are reduced to chunks of colour in the other pictures.

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2015 at 23:20 UTC
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-3 II article (521 comments in total)
In reply to:

zakaria: I think with this new pixel shift .. RICOH will use 24 mp sensor for the upcoming fullframe . I assume they will try to make this new feature a standard on all their new cameras.and this feature is just for preparing the flagship .

But so does HDR and yet people still use that.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 30, 2015 at 01:18 UTC
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-3 II article (521 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bhima78: I'm starting to think that Ricoh's sensor shift idea is actually better than Oly's as it will require a whole heck of a lot less processing, and can likely be done on the fly much faster. Plus, adding resolution isn't as big of an advantage as adding color information imo. If this works well, it could replace a Foveon sensor.

I suspect they limited the resolution aspect of this tech so as to not affect the future sales of their 36MP FF.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 23, 2015 at 03:10 UTC
In reply to:

ProfHankD: A little late to be getting into the FF DSLR business, isn't it? Sure does look a lot like their medium-format bodies.The interesting question is what sensor?

It's never too late for anything because every year there are fresh faces entering every single market on the planet.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 05:56 UTC
In reply to:

starjedi: Is the lens in front a FA 31mm?


Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 02:22 UTC
In reply to:

intruder61: Apart from all things Pentax which i really liking this, looks like the designer of the Lamborghini designed this.

That FA31 on the camera gives away the size as it looks just like a K-5 but with a much larger prism (I held up my K-5 with my FA-31 to compare). I suspect they'll eventually have two models - 50MP with a 24MP crop mode and, initially, a 36MP model with a 15MP crop mode.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 02:19 UTC

I sold my AF-S 300/4 and TC 1.4x some months ago and bought a Sigma 120-300 F2.8 "S". I'm finding the weight to be a real issue though, as I'm a casual shooter where tele's are concerned. I tend to use the Sigma racked to 300 most the time so I don't mind the idea of a fixed prime again, especially a compact one. The only thing that worries me about this lens is the glare issue from the Fresnel lens. I have been using the 120-300 in crop mode 99% of the time on my D810 and so a 400mm lens would be my preference.

The Pentax DA*300/4 is only 1.5" longer than this new Nikon and a grand cheaper so I'll consider that for my K-5 when I've made up my mind.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 07:51 UTC as 30th comment | 1 reply
On Enthusiast interchangeable lens camera 2013 roundup article (467 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zvonimir Tosic: And DPR recommends … Nikon D7100?
Gosh, both 7DII and K-3 are far superior machines, kings of this category. Both in capability, ruggedness, and one in price too.
And we are supposed to trust DPR’s ability to acknowledge truth and facts?
Good Lord, what is going on with this site?

I distinctly remember DPR stating that the K-3 score of 83% was in a higher category than the D7100 score of 85%. People were carrying on about the scores and DPR calmed them down stating that the K-3 was semi-pro and this was judged more harshly due to its professional competition. And yet here is the D7100 listed as best of the enthusiast DSLR category where both cameras are listed. All Pentax users figured this would end up the case. If it's not an "oversight" then what else is it but bias?

Before anyone flames me accusing me of being a Pentax tragic; I have 2x D800e, 1x D810 a K-5 and a K-01. I just happen to have a thing about lying politicians and used car salesmen.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 29, 2014 at 03:13 UTC
On Enthusiast interchangeable lens camera 2013 roundup article (467 comments in total)

Of course there's no reminder that the D7100 score of 85% is supposed to be in a lower category (enthusiast?) than the K-3 score of 83% (Semi-Pro?).

A deliberate oversight? Probably, but because it's built into the system they have weasel ways out like "sorry, we forgot about that"

Direct link | Posted on Nov 27, 2014 at 20:52 UTC as 61st comment
On Nikon announces AF-S Nikkor 20mm f/1.8G ED article (67 comments in total)
In reply to:

tom43: $799 for a Nikon lens doesn´t sound like high-end landscape lens matching the D810 resolution...let´s wait and see the first reviews.

And they only apply that coating to one surface IIRC. Whereas Pentax applies it's flourine and Nano coatings to all internal surfaces. I believe it's the Aero Brite coating they apply to the DA* lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 07:50 UTC
On Sigma announces two 150-600mm F/5-6.3 DG OS HSM zooms article (138 comments in total)
In reply to:

Suhas Sudhakar Kulkarni: Another @3 KG lens..too heavy. 1 KG heavier than Tamron.

I have to agree. I am bewildered by the offering of two almost identical lenses. The "pro" lens should have been an extension to the 120-300 range and more like 300-600 f4-5.6 IMO. My 120-300 is killing me as it is for weight, so something that doesn't overlap the range, and optimized for what the 120-300 is NOT, would have been preferred.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 22:14 UTC
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-S1 article (344 comments in total)
In reply to:

Doka: This camera is a disaster for left-handed people, when the ergonomics are very wrong, then it becomes a tupperwarebox, no matter the specifications.

Are you saying that you actually use your left hand to trigger the shutter on current DSLR models? Perhaps shooting with the camera upside down and triggering with the thumb might help ;)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2014 at 01:47 UTC
On Niko announces service advisory for D810 'bright spots' article (376 comments in total)

It seems my D810 is from the affected batch.

Here's what Nikon Australia have said on their website:
"Please consult your nearest Nikon service center if you own a D810 with the serial number belonging to the affected batch. They will keep your camera, and modify some of the image sensor adjustment values and update your camera’s firmware to resolve this issue. After servicing, the occurrence of bright spots in long exposures, and in images captured at an Image area setting of 1.2x (30x20), will be reduced.As image resolution and sharpness have been increased with the D810, even after cameras are serviced to resolve this issue, bright spots may, in some rare cases, be more noticeable in exposures longer than 30s than they were in images captured by previous cameras with the same exposure time. Should this be the case, bright spots can be further reduced by setting the D810's Long exposure NR function to On."

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 09:12 UTC as 8th comment

If I need something like this I load up a full screen image on my 27" monitor. As long as the DOF is shallow enough you don't pick up the screen dots. It's worked for the odd occasions I've needed something like this.

I also use one of my screens as a lighting panel to add colour when shooting small items I want to sell on eBay.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 26, 2014 at 02:45 UTC as 32nd comment
On Ricoh announces Pentax K-3 Prestige Edition article (166 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: It means new camera will be soon and nothing else.

I suspect there'll be a FF announced, or released at Photokina (yeah right..pfff) and this announcement seems to be an effort to squeeze a few more K-3 sales before that happens.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 23:26 UTC
On Ricoh announces Pentax K-3 Prestige Edition article (166 comments in total)
In reply to:

DPJoe2: My old Pentax 6x7 is wearing out after only 30yrs. I want a new DPentax 6x7, same body, which is a 2 ¼ by 2 ¾ inch exposure area. Now that would be a camera!

Enough resolution to double as a teleportation device.. Or just a DNA scanner perhaps?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 06:49 UTC
On Ricoh announces Pentax K-3 Prestige Edition article (166 comments in total)

This camera obviously executes commands with extreme prejudice!

You can honestly say you shot a landscape with this one. :)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 06:48 UTC as 27th comment
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1604 comments in total)
In reply to:

Class A: Offering a D800E next to a D800 is fine.

The attempt to restrict photographers to buying an incomplete camera -- lacking a necessary part; the Bayer AA filter -- should be commented on more markedly.

I'm happy for those who are unable to create shots that are sharp at the pixel level -- they won't miss a thing -- but there should be an option for those that are capable of creating the right conditions for really sharp shots.

If Nikon cannot provide the best of both worlds in one camera (like the Pentax K-3 with its optional AA-function), AFAIC, they need to give users the choice to opt for a complete camera with a different model. Make it more expensive if you must.

Targeting the person for "running his mouth" is not contributing to the conversation in a good way at all. Perhaps you should follow your own advice and STFU.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2014 at 11:40 UTC
Total: 238, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »