Michael S.

Michael S.

Lives in Austria Austria
Has a website at http://www.jdf-events.at
Joined on Oct 30, 2001

Comments

Total: 35, showing: 21 – 35
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

Lousy pictures and actually shows how much "photoshopping" counts nowadays in this business...give this photos an professional photoshop artist and, retouching background and lightning and almost everyone will be happy.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 7, 2012 at 06:12 UTC as 144th comment

Smelling the D600 with 24MP on full frame sensor coming up for $ 1500-1990!

;-)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 09:48 UTC as 74th comment | 2 replies
On Dan Chung posts 5D Mark III vs. D800 video shootout article (203 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dannyboy292: The test is not right...use a canon lens on the canon and the Nikon equivalent on the Nikon, canon users shoot with canon lenses not Nikon!

Entering the Canon-FanBoy...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 4, 2012 at 21:26 UTC
On Canon EOS 5D Mark III studio samples published article (287 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael S.: Too less for too much money!

Mk III is lightyears behind the D800. Will be intersting seeing the upcoming products from Canon, for sure the Mk III delievers not what so many, including hardcore Canon-fanboys have been waiting for.

@Antony John:

Ahhh...so what specific of the words used in my short post has given you the impression I am bashing Canon?
The only fanboy here is YOU.

I don't care what brand I am using - if you check - I do have Fujfilm, Leica, Nikon AND Canon.
So stop blameing Nikon for as it seems that you are not satisfied with what Canon brought recently on the market.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 29, 2012 at 06:55 UTC
On Canon EOS 5D Mark III studio samples published article (287 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael S.: Too less for too much money!

Mk III is lightyears behind the D800. Will be intersting seeing the upcoming products from Canon, for sure the Mk III delievers not what so many, including hardcore Canon-fanboys have been waiting for.

Oh boy...all those "hate" coming from the Canon guys who can't bear it...

It's almost impossible to imagine how it would have been the opposite - Canon bringing out a Mk III with the specs of the Nikon D800 and Nikon just an update of its D700, like from 5D Mk II to Mk III. I am sure thousands of posts by Canon fanboys will have been posted here and in the NIKON (!) forum to "laugh" about Nikon...

And if your computer can't open Nikon D800s files then get a slightly newer PC then one who is still using a 486 processor!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 28, 2012 at 18:03 UTC
On Canon EOS 5D Mark III studio samples published article (287 comments in total)

Too less for too much money!

Mk III is lightyears behind the D800. Will be intersting seeing the upcoming products from Canon, for sure the Mk III delievers not what so many, including hardcore Canon-fanboys have been waiting for.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 28, 2012 at 15:40 UTC as 66th comment | 10 replies
On Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact article (776 comments in total)

First "bad" spec that I saw already and can't be ignored even by good IQ the camera might have:

F2.8-5.8 stabilized zoom...

This should have been something like f2.0 - f4.0!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 16:05 UTC as 195th comment | 1 reply
On Nikon announces D4 'multi-media' DSLR article (228 comments in total)

GREAT tool for reportage/sports!

Nothing to be surprised - exactly as leaked a few months earlier...
;-)

And THANKS NIKON not taking part in the MEGAPIXEL Race!!!

All those non-pros crying for 36MP in a FX-sized sensor are just a bad joke...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2012 at 07:05 UTC as 45th comment
In reply to:

Michael S.: Another (senseless) Video-Lens that hopes to fool enough customers who think they will get an almost (performance like) Leica Noctilux for a small percentage of the costs of the "true" Noctilux.

WHY then a 4/3 and Leica M-lens mount?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 1, 2012 at 22:25 UTC

Another (senseless) Video-Lens that hopes to fool enough customers who think they will get an almost (performance like) Leica Noctilux for a small percentage of the costs of the "true" Noctilux.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 1, 2012 at 17:06 UTC as 14th comment | 4 replies

As with every large company in the world - the want to keep the payment for the workers as low as possible and therefore go to countries with fully (!) knowing the risk of earthquakes, flooding, turmoil...just to keep their profits high.

Build your cameras in central Europe and that would have never happened...

Direct link | Posted on Dec 1, 2011 at 21:09 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply

Must be the 1st of April today...

Sigma now really has gone mad. Hopefully the soon are all on a long vacation...in a very silent, relaxing building with high walls around and lots of men in white clothes.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 12, 2011 at 20:30 UTC as 202nd comment

Puh...price $100,-- to high.

Would be much higher demand with price-tag under $500,--.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2011 at 06:11 UTC as 80th comment
In reply to:

stopkidding: Thats ancient news. June 22, 2011? Slow news day at DPReview?

The FIRST News has been a speculation on June 22nd - BUT Dr. Kaufmann from Leica said YES the rumor is correct just yesterday - so NOT old News - read carefully.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 14, 2011 at 05:58 UTC

Complete nonsense putting such a small sensor in this camera...especially for that price.

Pentax seems to leave the market...

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2011 at 05:41 UTC as 199th comment
Total: 35, showing: 21 – 35
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »