More important than equipment, is the moment.
Next smart move from Apple is, Aperture free for all. A logical step.
Mike FL: I like my Lowepro SlingShot AW, and It has three sizes (102, 202, and 302). It is very light, well made, and it has its own raincoat. I like sling bag better than my backpack because:- Backpack is too hot on my back in summer.- Sling bag is easier to take things in and out.
The CON of the Lowepro SlingShot AW may be that it is too simple (less compartment) for some users.
Tamrac bags are good products, I personally think they have too many models, which sometimes can be difficult for brand management, and confusion for the customer its time to choose. It could very well reduce the line, and as a result the production costs. IMO. However you reminded me to buy a poncho, I'll take a stroll on Ebay now.
I agree when you say, "that it is too simple (less compartment) for some users." I have the 202 version and is also my perspective.But I have a lot of bag types, I can easily choose the type of bag to carry for certain functions. My most recent acquisition was the Think Tank retrospective 5, and I like it. especially for urban rapid inroads. Tamrac bag, I have one a long long time a go, for video.
Hear2see: I'd love it if DPReview could interview the new Kodak folks just to see what they're all about. Are they old time Kodak lovers or are they opportunity venture capitalists that don't care squat about photography.
Yes, my point too. No one will lose money for this project, is a business and like any business has to be profitable. Anyone who thinks otherwise is to think of a case of utopia. Anyway I think the original question is rhetorical, but not runs away from the reality of the line of thought, since there are other acquaintances that comes with strength, but soon die at birth cases. As I said earlier, I hope they succeed. It's good for everyone.
MadManAce: For Windows CS6:
Mac CS 6:
Use these links to download compressed folders and extract before installing to computers that are not connected to internet.
Sure. Just shared my experience. But in computer science, each case can be a different matter.
I think they are a opportunity venture capitalists that don't care squat about photography. BUT, if we can get advantages from this, who cares? Let's wait and see. the market always have other options, they are not the main as such has to show added value to the existing market.
One of my computers that is not connected to the internet, simply an editing station. For the others was not necessary this type of installation. The link works perfectly, was installed with success. Thanks
Good to see competition, I hope Kodak make the market and other manufacturers to rethink the policy of prices and products. I hope they succeed, regardless the type of market they are thinking. That helps put prices M4:3 in its right place, from manufacturers already well know, there is an abuse in price manipulation.
Digitall: Interesting comparation from RX100:
RX100 I 78% Silver AwardRX100 II 79% Silver AwardRX100 III 82% 82% Gold Award - First RX100 with Gold here.
I think there was a further evolution of the model I to II, due to sensor and not only, however it only takes one percentage point more than I version.
Previous cameras did not take gold, being an innovative and unrivaled far camera, as now, because only now RX100 takes gold.The medals worth the importance that we want to give, but I can not stop watching these developments with curiosity. The RX100 has always been ahead of the competition. And the other manufacturers have not bothered to put it on the market a rival since first model of RX100 I. I think they all deserve gold in its time, unfortunately there is no competition in its category and Sony know take advantage of this in the price, about ~23% more than the version I.
Yes, unfortunately the competition insists on not attack this series even after two years .
Interesting comparation from RX100:
Too slow for my taste, but I'm curious to know the results with this lens.
The real detail only begins to reveal from F4.0, before this value is in F3.2/3.5 are Ok, but not exceptional. In larger openings unconvincing compared to its predecessors.
Strange how the new LR 5.5 update was not announced here as has been normal, and certainly went unnoticed by DPR users, even with the recent news of ACR and DNG converter 8.5
Digitall: Why wast money on this services? I have my own Cloud service. At this moment 4TB for "Free", you only must buy a Home Cloud Storage. There are many options on the market, with prices to suit all tastes. And at least the content is stored in what is mine and I can access it from anywhere in the world without problem.
Yes I know, its free for 10gb, it is good for who dont need more than that, but, for who need more there other more attractive alternatives . I have 20gb on Nikon Image Space for free. And 25gb for free on Onedrive for example. and I have Onedrive connected to my Personal Cloud Service, so, 4Tb+25Gb+2Tb from external disc connected to my NAS as a extension. No need more, for now.
Why wast money on this services? I have my own Cloud service. At this moment 4TB for "Free", you only must buy a Home Cloud Storage. There are many options on the market, with prices to suit all tastes. And at least the content is stored in what is mine and I can access it from anywhere in the world without problem.
mcshan: If Canon made a dishwasher it would be better.
Dishwasher not know, in most washing machines they are one step ahead :)
Thanks for DIY Photo Projects forum, possibly being the first or the first few defenders of this thematic forum. Thanks again DPR.
What are the Dishwasher specifications?
PixelMover: "Hasselblad Certified"
..does that add more or less value than a Facebook 'Like'?