aris14: Save the forests!Stop using wooden grips..!
Seriously now, are there out there more than a hundred guys who, for some reasons -no matter what these reasons may be - need such a system?
>>Stop using wooden grips...!
Relax, with a product as niche and expensive as this, they'll only need to fell 1 tree per year.
GabrielZ: I wonder if these extension tubes will allow the XF 60mm Macro reach 1:1 life-size rather than half life-size that it currently goes down to? I hope in the near future Fujifilm releases a ring-light for Macro work too.
It would of been nice if the tethering software also worked with OS-X, and nice little firmware upgrades for the X-E2...I do like Fujifilm!
The tubes + 60 will get you down to 0.75x or thereabouts - Fuji released a data sheet giving the magnification for a range of lenses
Prairie Pal: I can see these drones becoming delivery vehicles for drug dealers.
Gives a whole new meaning to 'getting high'
b craw: I've made a number of pinhole cameras for student use. Those usually use film or (most often) paper negatives. Saying that this camera is a waste of money because you could simply build one is wrong because this uses Instamatic process. I've adapted existing Polaroid cameras to pinholes and it is somewhat more difficult than most imagine, and this offers multiple focal lengths. So, the price here is not outrageous unless one has a lot of experience making pinhole cameras.
I believe you would collapse the bellows in 5 stages (corresponding to the folds) which would change the angle of coverage. The interchangeable pinholes are just for exposure (and potentially depth of field, although I doubt if the difference would be very noticeable).
AbrasiveReducer: Definitely worthy of a movie. Exploration, survival & naughty penguins. I hear Hollywood knocking.
How about an adult-only episode of the Penguins from Madagascar?
'Owch! Hey, Rico, waddaya doin?''Oh sorry Kowalski, didn't realise you were just sleeping!'
Does it come with a lens hood?
I'm not getting one if it doesn't - I'm fed up with being ripped off.
Wow, just think how sharp all my cat pictures could be with this lens!
...although without autofocus, they would have to be sleeping cat pictures.
JJLMD: Canon and Nikon are tomorrow's IBM and Kodak unless they undergo an extreme makeover. I rekindled this hobby in earnest about 2 years ago after decades of disinterest. When I started researching gear, I started researching only Canon and Nikon but it didn't take me very long to realize that Sony, Fujifilm and Olympus were making the most exciting products. Look, there are still people who still see Cadillac as THE prestige brand so it'll take awhile but there's no doubt in my mind that Canon and Nikon are on the same path as IBM and Kodak. These companies were once dominant and during their reign, it was unimaginable they would fall all the way to the bottom.
IBM is history?
Perhaps on the PC front, but the last time I checked it's still a major force in the mainframe and services markets, as the 341,000 employees will no doubt testify.
pictureAngst: I put...
"Many of these power stations are inexorably heterogenous, places where there is a convergence, overlapping and blurring of meanings, functions and temporalities. Hopefully these images will allow the viewer to make a myriad of connections between these different temporalities at play in these sites and in the process perhaps also reflect about our relationship to and dependence on technology and the impact of this kind of technological application on our individual and social consciousness."
...into Google Translate (Philosophical Portuguese to Stupid English) and got...
"These crazy places will mess with your head and make you think those mad ancient scientific dudes had the best mojo in town'
"If you a giant brain geeky dude, it don't matter how big your house is, ain't no one coming to your party"
Amazing images, truly exceptional. It seems very appropriate to use a painstaking process to create them.
BaldCol: I went on a photography 'workshop' last year with 4 other photographers and a pro.
3 of us had SLRs, tripods and the usual bag of kit. One had a Leica camera and a Channel handbag for her trip into the Sussex countryside! Tells me all I need to know about Leica users.
Was there a photo wash-up at the end? Imagine how annoying it would be if her images were more interesting than yours!
peevee1: $900 for 18-135/3.5-5.6! Fuji is not exactly shy.For comparison Canon's new 18-135 IS STM costs $550 (Canon's old $500), Sony's $500 , Nikon's new 18-140 is also $500, Pentax 18-135WR also $500 - hell, you can buy whole WR k-50 with 18-135 for $900!And it is harder (more expensive) to reach 18mm on a DSLR!
Among mirrorless, more versatile (longer reach) Panasonic HD 14-140 is $400 (new 14-140 $630), Olympus 14-150 $600; Samsung 18-200 (again much longer reach) $700.
Um, thought it was harder (and so more expensive) to do quality 18mm on a mirrorless due to the closer rear element and greater angle of incidence between light and sensor?
Some useful reminders - particularly the one about keeping your gear in a sealed bag when moving between different temperatures and/or humidities, I always remember that one just after my lens has completely fogged up.
The whole lens caps thing will be lost on the 90% of owners who buy an SLR with a single megazoom lens.
BTW when using a lens cleaning solution, does anyone else get residual 'rainbow' smearing that then itself needs to be cleaned off?
Pah - call that dangerous?
I almost cut myself on a split plastic cup at the water cooler today - I could have bled to death right in front if my office colleagues, since none if them are ER trained.
Now that's danger.
RichRMA: "Desperate migrants" are the creation of the mass communication world. Formerly, "desperate" meant, "we have absolutely nothing and need to move somewhere else now." Now it's, "We're ok, but we see online what the north has and we want it to."
Hmm...and I suppose the many adults and children who died of starvation during their attempt did so because they couldn't stop playing Candy Crush on their mobiles?
Seriously, this is one of the most naive postings I've ever seen.
If Lego Arctic Batman had a camera, this would be it.
Hugo808: No UFO's?
No UFO in this shot - Elvis was clever enough to keep it on the other side of the moon.
He probably realised what the authorities would do if they found the movies those aliens had made of him with the fairy and the rabbit.
Retzius: Too much PP in these images
I wonder which film simulation app they used. Whichever one it is, it's not very realistic.