ryansholl

ryansholl

Lives in United States Johnston US, IA, United States
Joined on Mar 4, 2009

Comments

Total: 326, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

DaveClark: We don't need more laws, thank you very much. How about enforcing the ones we already have?

I went searching just for you, goob. Came up with a great reference for you, since you asked elsewhere in these comments: a police department acknowledging our right to record them.

https://go.mpdconline.com/GO/GO_304_19.pdf

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2015 at 14:44 UTC
In reply to:

R_U_Q_R_U: You already have the right to photograph police in the USA.

See: https://www.aclu.org/kyr-photo

"When in public spaces where you are lawfully present you have the right to photograph anything that is in plain view. That includes pictures of federal buildings, transportation facilities, and police. Such photography is a form of public oversight over the government and is important in a free society."

"Police officers may not confiscate or demand to view your digital photographs or video without a warrant. The Supreme Court has ruled that police may not search your cell phone when they arrest you, unless they get a warrant. Although the court did not specifically rule on whether law enforcement may search other electronic devices such as a standalone camera, the ACLU believes that the constitution broadly prevents warrantless searches of your digital data..."

No. Various police departments and officers conveniently "forget" this law. After eleventy billion dollars' worth of settlements across the US already for trampling on the rights of citizens to record, there's no way that all of law enforcement doesn't already know that filming is in itself completely legal.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2015 at 13:45 UTC
In reply to:

DaveClark: We don't need more laws, thank you very much. How about enforcing the ones we already have?

Completely incorrect. Just stop talking, seriously.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2015 at 13:39 UTC
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: 15 feet doesn't cut it if you want to record police behaviour from inside your car after they have pulled you over.

Getting in the face of cops when they're trying to do their job is a crime in itself and the cops can haul that person away no questions asked. These laws have nothing to do with that. These are regarding filming and filming alone.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2015 at 13:18 UTC
On Sony Alpha 7S Review preview (474 comments in total)

timely Sony a100 review to follow

Direct link | Posted on Mar 3, 2015 at 15:15 UTC as 41st comment
On Canon EOS-1D C sees $4000 price drop in North America article (249 comments in total)
In reply to:

James Booba: Sony FS7 ... 7.990
Canon 1DC ... 7.990

Hard to decide lol ... Crap Canon.

I think it was very well played sarcasm.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 3, 2015 at 18:45 UTC
On Canon EOS-1D C sees $4000 price drop in North America article (249 comments in total)
In reply to:

MediaDigitalVideo: Caskback for those who payed the full price Canon ?

Lol.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 2, 2015 at 19:16 UTC
On Canon EOS-1D C sees $4000 price drop in North America article (249 comments in total)
In reply to:

Lassoni: Doesn't the Sony A7s walk over this, and for much lower price?

I think that's safe to assume, since the discount alone is literally what you can buy two a7s bodies for today.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 2, 2015 at 15:53 UTC
In reply to:

ryansholl: At what point does Nikon start shipping packaging to big box stores with postage already affixed for the return trip?

I've got the impression you're that guy everyone tries to sneak out of conversations with at parties.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 12, 2015 at 20:49 UTC
In reply to:

ryansholl: At what point does Nikon start shipping packaging to big box stores with postage already affixed for the return trip?

My question was a joke. GFY.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 12, 2015 at 16:14 UTC

At what point does Nikon start shipping packaging to big box stores with postage already affixed for the return trip?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 12, 2015 at 14:25 UTC as 12th comment | 7 replies
On Enthusiast mirrorless camera roundup (2014) article (309 comments in total)

Yeah, screw the a6000. Sony quit building APS-C mirrorless, right DPR?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 29, 2014 at 13:46 UTC as 42nd comment | 2 replies
On Price released for Brikk's 24k gold Nikon Df article (389 comments in total)

Say what you will about the ridiculousness of it, but you've got to admit that when it comes to gold and fishskin covered cameras this one looks pretty good.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 31, 2014 at 00:38 UTC as 159th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

autochrome: I hope someone updates the standards, because it's going to be problematic setting your ISO soon. ISO 819200, 3276800, 26214400, ...

I really wish they'd just set ISO 200 to a standard of 1 and then go logarithmically from there. ISO 409600 becomes gain of 11, for instance, ISO 1600 a gain of 4, etc. Makes a hell of a lot more sense than dealing with the ridiculous numbers we're already dealing with.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 03:18 UTC
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: I used a 1.3 Megapixel camera in 1999 and loved it. I could definitely still do ok with a less than 2 megapixel camera today if it could see in the dark.

You don't need a 1.3mp sensor to see in the dark, the a7s is a credit card away :)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 03:14 UTC
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: According to Canon "They have a better sensor than this".

Yeah, and according to my uncle he's got a better mousetrap. Turns out he's full of it but it makes him sound great at the time.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 03:13 UTC
In reply to:

bgbs: The question is when will it be in DSLR's?

Never. Have you been paying attention to Sony?!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 03:09 UTC
In reply to:

rrccad: didn't canon have a high density sensor demo a few years ago?

That's not fair. They recently acquired a patent on something they call the "status quo".

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 03:08 UTC
In reply to:

graybalanced: That sensor is so sensitive, you have to be careful what you say around it.

I loved your post. a7s owner, that "blushing" is inherent to the sensor and your post rings of truth and humor. Well done, sir.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 03:06 UTC
In reply to:

Stigg: no matter what they try it will never equal film

I hope so

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 03:04 UTC
Total: 326, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »