RichRMA: Resolution looks more like 12mp than 16, but noise control is great!
Comparing the E-M5II with this camera in the studio scene @200 JPG & RAW......the Fuli is completely lost, either something is wrong or something is wrong! ;)
It's a lovely little camera but that's one hell'o'va price for a compact, the new Oly 5II with lens costs same/less.
A lot of margin for fashion in there.
Boxbrownie: Looks interesting, but just look at the view of the side of the lenses you will get through the viewfinder!
@HowaboutRAW, Yes I have used a Leica M, but started on a Leica IIIf back in the 70's........so yes, I have looked through a Leica viewfinder and know what it's like, even if the early ones were a bit naff! LOL
And this camera is NOT a Leica.......so we will wait and see, but still looks a bit close to me.
You only have to look at the view in the third product picture to see how narrow the angle needs to be to cause a problem.
Looks interesting, but just look at the view of the side of the lenses you will get through the viewfinder!
Its not a camera ranking though is it........its a photo downloaded ranking, so its not surprising Apple is so popular with all the i-phones and i-pads being used by consumers (not enthusiasts) for taking piccies......bit of a dumb table really.
StephenL: When will people realise there is no such thing as full frame? m4/3 is full frame to an Olympus user. Yet to a Pentax 645 owner, a Canon 5D sensor is tiny.
Without being too pedantic I think we can safely assume the name is applied to cameras which in films days would have been 35mm film format.
A real shame if Metz goes under, I used Metz for over 40 years professionally, starting with a wet cell flash.......had to keep your eye on the floating balls :)
I think I only ever had one fail on me and then it was bashing it against a wall half way up a Jacobs ladder that did it.
Thoughts: Only 5 g gold has been used.
Less in fact, as the gold metal bits have no chrome plating, thats come off to plate in gold.
I like it though.........
papa natas: Lee Filters...OMG!!!These guys have been there since forever.I bought a couple of their polarizers and masks for blue skies back in the late 70's.They made good old Technicolor movie films come alive & with pure colors.Great British know how.No, I'm not being paid for this.I just admire good, enduring, no bull products.Is the Spitfire coming back?
Cooke, Taylor-Hobson, Ross.......all gone now, but in their time made some of the finest lenses in the world.Keep up lad, keep up ;)
goblover: Is it just me, or the Canon G7x sample was motion blurred? And the LX100? If you see the top left and bottom right, the red water colour paint, and colour circle on the bottom left, the letters are blurred. The circle also not a full circle, a bit distorted. I'm not the expert, maybe DP Reviewers can help clarify why is that?
Not just you at all, in fact surprised it wasn't spotted before publication........any response DPR?
And if thats not a bit of camera shake, then Canon need to go back to the drawing board on lens design.
Boxbrownie: Looks like a very interesting/nice camera......just one thing......it looks bloomin' awfull with that skinny little lens barrel extended......very embarressing :))
Well if you mean a little sausage poking out the front of your body, then yes, I guess so ;)
Looks like a very interesting/nice camera......just one thing......it looks bloomin' awfull with that skinny little lens barrel extended......very embarressing :))
Boxbrownie: Try walking normally without hanging onto the camera and let it just swing, attached by one point it'll just swing around and twist about quite insecurely, this is nothing new as an invention, just another version of a failed idea, you cannot beat having two fixed points toi hang a camera from............
Kepp trying chaps!
@fuego6.....so its on a strap around your neck and shoulder and you STILL have to hold it with one hand? Not exactly what straps are for.....@Gollan......I am sure yours is fine.........
Try walking normally without hanging onto the camera and let it just swing, attached by one point it'll just swing around and twist about quite insecurely, this is nothing new as an invention, just another version of a failed idea, you cannot beat having two fixed points toi hang a camera from............
MikeF4Black: I'm very, very disappointed.
You should put your dog on a diet!
karet: This could actually be useful in washing machines for surgical instruments or glass and utensils in pharmaceutical production units. When validating the efficacy of the machine when trying new loading patterns this could be additional proof that the water and detergent go where you want it to go.
You do not think the manufacturers already do this?
I was sealing micro video cameras inside engine inlet manifolds/oil sumps/air boxes etc etc 20 years ago, I am sure the likes of Bosch and Meile do this all the time.
Its a pity about loosing the optical finder, and a shame Canon could not have put as much effort into developing a more accurate and better OF as they have developing the LCD add-on carbuncle........er......LCD add-on viewfinder.
Lovely, Norfolk is our stamping ground for pleasure and how I wish it looked like this still.........
What's with all the RAW/JPEG tosh......that can be worked around usually.......more importantly for a semi serious underwater camera is the ring flash facility.......brilliant move Olly!