Nukunukoo: Ah, if only we had lossless compression...
Give me loss less compression - Until then I'm a Nikon guy - Unless I'm shooting my M4/3rds.Give me a fully articulated screen - Until then I'm sticking with my Panny.
Love the perforation on this one!
"Making the Shot" is the perfect entry for "Coach, put me in!!"The poor woman would like to be 'in the game' but she is too busy making the winning shot...I get it!
"despite being clothed."
Can't hide that sexy body underneath...Where is the sexy body mate?
"...can't hide that sexy body underneath"??LOL - Was this a joke?
She is sexy but "can't hide that sexy body underneath"?Yeah, she is sexy, the shot is decent - But dude - where is this BODY referenced in the rules???You got face, hair and, IDK, is she an amputee? Where is the body parts?
Sad that an image with out clothes would even finish in the top 100 of a contest about clothes...Just goes to show the quality of the voters and how well they understand basic elements of Art...Or basic elements of simple directions..?
Not sure his sexiness came through..?
A travesty...You should have gotten an adult, or an English speaking person to help you understand the rules!You def got robbed though...Last place had your name all over it!
I think your subject fits this challenge to a tee - even with the 'less than stellar" quality of the shot, it should have carried to a much better showing than it garnered.These 'contests' are getting pretty bogus and many entries should be bounced right away because they fail to adhere to even abstract interpretations of the 'rules'.Your girl is SEXY and her clothes are doing little to hide that fact - Good choice there!I think the heavy handed processing you employed may have hurt this photo, and I am not sure that the umbrella is a worthwhile element.
"your clothes can't hide that sexy body underneath it"Seems that many didn't really understand the most basic part of the challenge...It was as much about the clothes as the body.
If there is no or little "hiding" going on and the vast majority of the body is simply exposed...Yeah, well what ever, right?Did you intend to make a mockery of the contests, or did you simply not understand the challenge?
Both...So you didn't understand the Challenge and intended to make a mockery of the contest? Then you also figured out that I wasn't the host!?? (you got help with the last one, didn't you?)Opps, sorry - I didn't realize you are a "Special Needs" photographer...My bad.Your shot is excellent - Did you push the button all by yourself and everything!?
The fetish of military equipment helps to support militarization, war, deficits and misery - Please find subjects more suited to elevating the human subject, these pretty images hide a grotesque reality of burned children and destroyed homes and should not be portrayed in a favorable light.We should fight or resists militarization, not glorify it.
Score: 0"in your opinion and by the standards of the country of your origin, is poor."This guy looks to have a decent job in an above average shop where they have time to fool around with photography, no?What ever the qualities of the shot - It doesn't belong in this challenge.
"I'm Too Sexy for My Shirt" - Where is the SHIRT????
"...attractive who despite being clothed..." - FAIL"...can't hide that sexy body underneath it..." - FAIL"...sexy body is just blowing your mind, despite being clothed." - FAIL
-just sayin' WTF over?
Nice shot - Let's give it up for the Milf's...
JerryShots: Wow - with so many articles (FIVE and counting!!) gracing the page you'd think this site almost thinks this is an important camera...Yet none of us will ever buy one and few of us would ever even consider this camera...DPReview seems to have it's head up it's...Well, another case where you are just out of touch with the consumers of your site and on a different planet from all the gear we will all purchase this year.Thanks for so much wasted 'ink', no risk of becoming irrelevant - You've made it!!
I'm consumed with fury about the whole thing then?You are desperate to personalize the original comment, not sure why...Did you write all five articles, lol?No, I'll fume in my furry while the sales of this newest 'legendary camera' sky rocket - What's next, reviews of 1939 vintage box cameras?