ventur

ventur

Joined on Oct 15, 2011

Comments

Total: 35, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Sony unveils FE PZ 28-135mm F4 G OSS cinema lens article (100 comments in total)
In reply to:

HMeYe: $2499 for an f4 mid range zoom !?!?!?! this is crazy ... better stick to my Leica M9 system !

this is a video lens, do you prefer your leica system for video??? ahahah

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 10:14 UTC
On Sony unveils FE PZ 28-135mm F4 G OSS cinema lens article (100 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dazzer8888: Damn, that's a nice lens for the A7

its a video dedicated lens

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 10:06 UTC
On Sony unveils FE PZ 28-135mm F4 G OSS cinema lens article (100 comments in total)
In reply to:

ET2: WHere is FS7 announcement? That's E-Mount camera

hands on: http://vimeo.com/105937275

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 10:06 UTC
On Zeiss launches Loxia full frame lenses for Sony E-mount article (267 comments in total)
In reply to:

Black Box: This is the first time I hear that autofocus makes lenses less compact. Zeiss just can't make a good autofocus system.

@Edgar

how would they do that? A7/A7R/A7S dont have screw drive motor

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2014 at 14:57 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Review preview (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

nikon power: IMO, most credit and praise to Sony should go to Carl Zeiss and his lens.

like most of Nikon's credits should go to sony sensors, what would be a D800 without sony?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 24, 2014 at 16:32 UTC
In reply to:

1drey: Uh, and after release of new model based on this sensor Sony will produce a couple of lenses... in a year or so. And a couple more - during the next three years.

more then the older EOS-M has

Direct link | Posted on Jun 19, 2014 at 21:56 UTC
In reply to:

Max Savin: Sigma f1.4 for Nikon: 23.46 oz (1.466 pounds)

A7r camera: 14.36 oz
35mm Sony FE f2.8: 4.23 oz.

Backpacking 20-30 miles on rough trails and overland. Which would you carry?

ok, you can carry weight, but you'll travel slower, make shorter distances, and it will be harder to walk/climb on difficult terrain!

and every mile you make the heavier it feels, and more energy you'll spend and more water youll have to carry...

weight always matter, unless you photograph at home!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 22, 2014 at 22:29 UTC
On Challenge of Challenges: vote for the best shot of 2013 article (121 comments in total)
In reply to:

AmirhosainD90: As you can see, it's obvious that all of these shots are extremely manipulated. So this is CG challenge, not photography challenge!
I'm hero, if I could take a super shot by proper selection of subject, frame, exposure, speed, Angle, ... right on the scene and submit my shot SOOC. Everyone can sit behind his laptop and render an artificial design better than these by "3D Max", "Photoshop", "Corel", ... even without a camera.
At last, photographers should separate their ways from graphistes!

by your standards Ansel Adams didn't make photography either right? he was the king of "Photoshop" of its time, but that doesn't make him less photographer, does it?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 4, 2014 at 17:10 UTC
On Canon announces EOS M2 in Japan article (613 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gregm61: All THREE lenses of the system. Wow.....what a "committment" ;)

@EvokeEmotion

Sony A7r also disagree with you ;)

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2013 at 16:36 UTC
On Adobe expands Photoshop and Lightroom offer article (628 comments in total)
In reply to:

srados: "Adobe", what a person should do if his/hers computer IS NOT 24/7 connected to internet?I have my workhorse AWAY from viruses and other garbage. Keeping me disconnected saves me money in antivirus software...By the way I am boycotting subscription based software.Still happy with my CS 5...and yes when I can not install it on my new version of operating system software I will look up Corell line of products.

virus?? just stay away from porn sites, illegal downloads, suspicious sites, don't click on every link that you get in a email, and keep your software updated.

there's plenty of good free anti-virus, you even have "microsoft security essencials", that do a very good job

so get out of the 90's, there's no reason for you to keep the internet off

Direct link | Posted on Nov 25, 2013 at 11:55 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

liquid stereo: Deck chairs on the titanic...

Oly/Pana/Fuji/Sony: Here are different/better offerings — ergo, sensor size, solution size, high ISO performance, etc. — at a lower price.

Nikon: Here's one of our cams — same features, in an angled body — for the same (high) price.

Canon: What's all this then?

@ Tomskyair

"Sony? Those guys who failed to make anything wider than 18mm (27mm FF) for their NEX-system for years."

are you ignorante or just trying to look like one?

Sony has lenses wider then 18mm since they released the first NEX... 16mm 2.8, and they have a very good 10-18mm f4 also, that also looks to be wider than 18mm... oh the ignorance...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 3, 2013 at 20:22 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)

looks like a Sony A850 reborn...

retro look
full frame SLR
Same 24mpx sensor of the Nikon D3X
dont have vídeo
release price in 2009: under $2000...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 21:51 UTC as 324th comment | 1 reply
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2372 comments in total)
In reply to:

Martos164: Congratulations to Sony on this bold move with the A7 &A7r. Its a mile stone in digital technology. I"m impressed . It looks retro,with features you saw in old film cameras from yester year. Also it looks like it has all the features from Canon & Nikon full frame cameras,except its in a little package. Some people might quip,and whinge about its looks. I couldn't care less what they think. If the cameras can do,as what Sony says they can do ,then i want one.The cameras,look as if they have been designed by someone,who like simple,robust,tough,well designed features in a camera.

Give it time,and i think Sony will rule. Sony must've spent a small fortune on R&D. I hope people,will take to these cameras,like ducks to water. If they do,the prices will drop. Sony can see the future in digital technology,and its heading in the right direction.

My only beef is the lens price. If Sony,can reduce the lens prices, to match the other camera,giants,then they will win the camera war

@ABM,

i think you're a little bit confused, NEX mount is not dead, their mount (E-mount) lives on, NEX is just a camera model, but A7, A7r, Nex-7, Nex-6, Nex-5r, Nex-3N, VG900, FS700... etc... they all use E-mount, but some have a bigger sensor, just like Nikons DX and FX

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2013 at 21:53 UTC
On Nikon video hints at long-desired 'digital FM' article (552 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sad Joe: Bring it on ! I still have my FM from 1979...and whilst your at it how about a FF rangefinder camera ? Oh sorry Sony already have one.....

it´s not propaganda, its a clarification, it seems that there is alot of confused people out there...

and you have to do your math again... do you know how many lenses released Sony in 2012/13? hint: more then Canon and Nikon ;)

and by the way, Nikon has another mount you forgot, you cant forget to split the CX mount in 2, CX and CX-AW, cause you only have a waterproof body if you have waterproof lenses.

and just to finish, i'm not doing blind propaganda, Sony
has released a great line of mirroless APS-C cameras and lenses, and now it steped up and made it full frame to, it made the smallest/cheapest/lightest fullframe camera ever, with excellent Zeiss optics, and thas a good thing in my book ;), just dont know why it bothers you!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2013 at 20:50 UTC
On Nikon video hints at long-desired 'digital FM' article (552 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sad Joe: Bring it on ! I still have my FM from 1979...and whilst your at it how about a FF rangefinder camera ? Oh sorry Sony already have one.....

3 diferent mounts? afaik Sony has 2 mounts, A-mount and E-mount, and each of them has 2 formats, APS-C and Full Frame

the same goes with any other brand, Canon and Nikon also have 2 mounts, one for SLR and other for mirrorless, the BIG diference is that Sony has a FF mirrorless and canikon dont ;)

and yes, there arent very lenses available, but the FF mirrorless system is one week old, so its not that bad, in 2014 there will be 10 lenses available. Can you tell me how many lenses have the EOS-M and CX mounts?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2013 at 20:21 UTC
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2372 comments in total)
In reply to:

Yxa: Sony has gone the Olympus way
Olympus dumped the 4/3 for the m4/3
To cater for the 4/3 lenses they introduced an adapter to mount the 4/3 lenses on m4/3 cameras
=A-mount to E-mount
I'm glad I didn't choose the 4/3 or the A-mount
I have a Nikon FF that have backwards compatibility of lenses to at least 1972

@ Henry M. Hertz, it does to me, i travel alot and do alot of hiking, so a camera that weight alot less then a tipical FF SLR is a gem!! i shoot alot of landscapes and i cant see any advantage of an SLR over this camera in this tipe of photography!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 10:41 UTC
In reply to:

yabokkie: Sony E20/2.8 is equivalent to about 31mm f/4.3 on 35mm format.
Sony E24/1.8 is about 37mm f/2.8,
Canon M22/2 is about 35mm f/3.2, and
Pana G20/1.7 is about 39mm f/3.3.

compared to the last three, E20/2.8 is wider and darker.
all these lenses are very easy and very cheap to make, and
I think they are all quite handy to use, even for indoor if you don't mind IQ.

what image? have you seen any?

i judje the IQ by looking at photos, not some numbers on the lens barrel and made up equivalencies.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2013 at 16:24 UTC
In reply to:

yabokkie: Sony E20/2.8 is equivalent to about 31mm f/4.3 on 35mm format.
Sony E24/1.8 is about 37mm f/2.8,
Canon M22/2 is about 35mm f/3.2, and
Pana G20/1.7 is about 39mm f/3.3.

compared to the last three, E20/2.8 is wider and darker.
all these lenses are very easy and very cheap to make, and
I think they are all quite handy to use, even for indoor if you don't mind IQ.

what the hell are you talking about?

exposure!

i have this lens 20mm f2.8 @ 2.8 on my Nex-5 at ISO 100

I have a Minolta 20mm f2.8 @ 2.8 on my A900 at ISO 100

isnt the exposure time the same?

what mambo jambo are you talking about?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2013 at 15:18 UTC
In reply to:

yabokkie: Sony E20/2.8 is equivalent to about 31mm f/4.3 on 35mm format.
Sony E24/1.8 is about 37mm f/2.8,
Canon M22/2 is about 35mm f/3.2, and
Pana G20/1.7 is about 39mm f/3.3.

compared to the last three, E20/2.8 is wider and darker.
all these lenses are very easy and very cheap to make, and
I think they are all quite handy to use, even for indoor if you don't mind IQ.

why is it equivalent to an f4.3? it says 2.8 on the lens

if its because of DOF... well, who cares, it's a 20mm APS-C lens, shallow deptf of field its never gonna be relevant...

what matter is the light that hit the sensor, but i dont see anybody talking about T-stops, only about silly equivalences!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2013 at 14:58 UTC
In reply to:

zinedi: Why this slooow expensive dummy again? Wouldn't it be better to make a true piece of glass for fair price? But Sony is obviously not capable - good optics is out of reach of their apprehension.

yes, its better to invest in Canon's wonderfull mirrorless system that the only has 2 crappy lens and the only body its worst then a 3 year old nex body or the fabulous Nikon 1 series with their "gigantic" sensor!

have you haver seen a Nex-6?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2013 at 14:47 UTC
Total: 35, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »