KTSFotos

KTSFotos

Lives in Brazil Curitiba - Paraná, Brazil
Works as a Designer
Joined on Dec 17, 2009
About me:

Name: Kiyoshi Takahase Segundo
Designer & Amateur Photographer

Comments

Total: 18, showing: 1 – 18
On Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction article (1879 comments in total)

Adobe is opening doors for new companies. Many of the professionals who works in large companies, began with softwares (pirate, older version or whatever) at home. Eliminating this option automatically opens space for new programs to be used for new amateurs (future professionals). Rare are the employees who get paid for taking classes from programs (e.g. after effects) or any other program (without at least the base of knowledge). Rare are the companies who hire someone to learn from his experienced functionary and taking your time.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 23:56 UTC as 244th comment

My first disappointment with Adobe. I'll look for the competition.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 21:56 UTC as 71st comment | 1 reply
On Nikon D7100 Hands-on Preview preview (493 comments in total)

It's easy to compare, RAW Photos below to download:

D7100 / RAW Photos
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/nikon-d7100/nikon-d7100THMB.HTM

D5200 / RAW Photos
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/nikon-d5200/nikon-d5200THMB.HTM

Sony SLT-A77 / RAW Photos
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA77/AA77THMB.HTM

Pentax K5-IIs / RAW Photos
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/pentax-k5-iis/pentax-k5-iisTHMB.HTM

I use Camera RAW. I open the pictures and pull the edge of the parameters. Highlights, Shadows, Blacks, Noise Reduction, Chromatic Aberration, etc.. Then I open in jpg, resize to smaller camera (In this case Pentax K5-IIs) image size and put in layers to compare. This way I can see which is the best image quality, detail preservation, HDR, etc. It's simple.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2013 at 15:39 UTC as 59th comment
On Nikon posts sample images from new D7100 article (95 comments in total)

Nice photos!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 22, 2013 at 00:08 UTC as 28th comment

Very nice pictures, in special the TV beside the phone. Very very cool.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 18, 2012 at 00:09 UTC as 9th comment
In reply to:

Gergob: I'd rather buy 2 Canon 5D Mark III's and have $32 left.

Who cares about the sale of camera? I buy equipment to use not to sell in 20 years.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 23:18 UTC
In reply to:

Gergob: I'd rather buy 2 Canon 5D Mark III's and have $32 left.

Not even need to be a D800 or 5DMKIII, may be even lower, is enough.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 23:11 UTC
On Canon EOS 5D Mark III studio samples published article (287 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: Even att Raw 12800 Nikon d800 shows more information in the shadows
and higher resolution, before down sampling to 5dmk2 picture size

color noise is similar but is seen more clearly in the Nikon because of the larger image size

If there was a 16MP camera with more quality and details that one of 36MP, sure I would buy a 16MP if the price was affordable and fair, then for me it is not competition of MP, but best result. I can turn my photos at 16MP to 100MP in photoshop if I wanted, but the quality and detail? This is my opinion.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 28, 2012 at 14:30 UTC
On Canon EOS 5D Mark III studio samples published article (287 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: Even att Raw 12800 Nikon d800 shows more information in the shadows
and higher resolution, before down sampling to 5dmk2 picture size

color noise is similar but is seen more clearly in the Nikon because of the larger image size

I believe the ultimate goal of most is to have quality photos, with details and less noise as possible. If achieved this using Nikon 36MP for $500US. dollars unless 5DMKIII, so for me the D800 is better yes! No matter if it has more or less MP, but have a better outcome at a lower price. If I need a 22MP image and if it is necessary to reduce from 36 to 22, it's great, to me is perfect.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 28, 2012 at 14:12 UTC
In reply to:

KTSFotos: Nikon D800 X Canon 5D MKIII
This was done only for the curiosity of those who like to compare cameras.

The sample images were taken from Imaging-Resource.

I compared the photos at ISO 50, 400, 3200, 6400, 25600 and 102400.
Some pictures were edited in photoshop and reduced in size to compare with the canon picture size, to see the IQ.
I pointed out details that are important to me. In the case for me, high ISO is totally useless, since I never took pictures more than ISO3200. Any form of noise that is not possible to remove in photoshop for me is useless.
All the image processing was done over the Nikon and Canon at the same time in the same software. The opinion may differ from one person to another, however, the comparisons are there.
Enjoy!

https://picasaweb.google.com/104343264324531368264/NikonD800XCanon5DMKIII

True, thanks for correcting my mistake!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2012 at 14:55 UTC
In reply to:

KTSFotos: Nikon D800 X Canon 5D MKIII
This was done only for the curiosity of those who like to compare cameras.

The sample images were taken from Imaging-Resource.

I compared the photos at ISO 50, 400, 3200, 6400, 25600 and 102400.
Some pictures were edited in photoshop and reduced in size to compare with the canon picture size, to see the IQ.
I pointed out details that are important to me. In the case for me, high ISO is totally useless, since I never took pictures more than ISO3200. Any form of noise that is not possible to remove in photoshop for me is useless.
All the image processing was done over the Nikon and Canon at the same time in the same software. The opinion may differ from one person to another, however, the comparisons are there.
Enjoy!

https://picasaweb.google.com/104343264324531368264/NikonD800XCanon5DMKIII

I said that was accurate?
I said I used RAW?
I know what I am doing, more than you think!
And another ...
Just because there is RAW, It's very very hard the Canon or Nikon, make a crap image result in a jpg format, just because there is RAW. I think the both will do to show the best, even in jpg convertion. So, if there is the jpg result, the comparison is very close, ok? It's easy to put blame in jpg.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2012 at 13:00 UTC

Nikon D800 X Canon 5D MKIII
This was done only for the curiosity of those who like to compare cameras.

The sample images were taken from Imaging-Resource.

I compared the photos at ISO 50, 400, 3200, 6400, 25600 and 102400.
Some pictures were edited in photoshop and reduced in size to compare with the canon picture size, to see the IQ.
I pointed out details that are important to me. In the case for me, high ISO is totally useless, since I never took pictures more than ISO3200. Any form of noise that is not possible to remove in photoshop for me is useless.
All the image processing was done over the Nikon and Canon at the same time in the same software. The opinion may differ from one person to another, however, the comparisons are there.
Enjoy!

https://picasaweb.google.com/104343264324531368264/NikonD800XCanon5DMKIII

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2012 at 01:15 UTC as 32nd comment | 6 replies

Nikon D800 X Canon 5D MKIII
This was done only for the curiosity of those who like to compare cameras.

The sample images were taken from Imaging-Resource.

I compared the photos at ISO 50, 400, 3200, 6400, 25600 and 102400.
Some pictures were edited in photoshop and reduced in size to compare with the canon picture size, to see the IQ.
I pointed out details that are important to me. In the case for me, high ISO is totally useless, since I never took pictures more than ISO3200. Any form of noise that is not possible to remove in photoshop for me is useless.
All the image processing was done over the Nikon and Canon at the same time in the same software. The opinion may differ from one person to another, however, the comparisons are there.
Enjoy!

https://picasaweb.google.com/104343264324531368264/NikonD800XCanon5DMKIII

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2012 at 01:15 UTC as 69th comment
In reply to:

pacogwapo: Check this out D800 whiners!

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Nikon-D800-Review/Sensor-performance

Oh my god, oh my god, oh my god, I want this camera!!!! Is the best of the world!!!! 95 - DXO Lab

Direct link | Posted on Mar 23, 2012 at 18:07 UTC
On Nikon D4 & D800: What do the Professionals Think? article (391 comments in total)

If some people who comment here and complain about the cameras and the website, taking pictures at the same level of their complaints, would certainly be one of the best photographers in the world, but thankfully the claims does not promote anyone. The camera is there to be bought, and not to be accept. To me the D800 is perfect.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:28 UTC as 87th comment | 1 reply
On Nikon D800 preview (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

Valentin Hertz: Got this from amazon (D800)...Now although I don't like to see 4fps just wanna make sure that my lenses will shine with this toy...They do now on D7k..
AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR
AF-S NIKKOR 85mm f/1.4G
AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II
(AF NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8D )

Any comments please? Thank you!

I think exactly the same way.
Nikon D7000
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm F/1.4G
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 17-35mm F/2.8D ED-IF
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 105mm F/2.8G ED IF VR MICRO
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm F/2.8G ED VR II
Nikon TC-17 EII 1.7X TELECONVERTER F/D-AF-S

Direct link | Posted on Feb 9, 2012 at 01:18 UTC
On Nikon D800 preview (1118 comments in total)

Nikon D800E Samples

http://mansurovs.com/nikon-d800e-image-samples

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2012 at 22:35 UTC as 250th comment
On Nikon D800 preview (1118 comments in total)

I think the great advantage of having large pixel resolution, is able to reduce the image size in photoshop to further reduce the image noise. Who has not noticed that a large image reduced in size, virtually eliminates the noise? The D700 is pretty good to have low noise, imagine the D800 with the same (or close) level of quality, reducing the image to 16MP for example?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2012 at 21:40 UTC as 254th comment
Total: 18, showing: 1 – 18