SirSeth

SirSeth

Lives in United States Hagerstown, United States
Works as a Teacher
Has a website at wallygoots.smugmug.com
Joined on Feb 8, 2004
About me:

My plan is to ever improve my trade, my hobbies, and my relationships with family, friends, and my God. My trade is teaching Math and Computers. My primary hobbies are lutherie (guitar building) and photography. My God is slow to anger and abounding in love. He will not always accuse, nor will he harbor His anger forever; He does not treat us as our sins deserve or repay us for our iniquities. For as high as the heavens are above the earth so great is His love for those who fear him. As far as the east is from the west so far has he removed our transgressions from us. If you have questions or gripes about my God, I always enjoy talking with someone who is a seeker. Rock throwers are rarely convinced of anything spiritual and I can respect their desire to believe differently than myself.

Comments

Total: 186, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Good IQ up to ISO6400 and then mush. Better DOF separation than smaller sensors. Over all, looks like a good camera and I expect good photographers will turn out very good pictures with it--as can be said for every other recent modern system camera. Sony is offering something smaller and less expensive than most FF offerings and I view that as good progress. For those who value it's strengths, it looks good. Unlike most of the pundits, I don't feel like it has to dominate every aspect in order to be a good camera.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2013 at 13:17 UTC as 24th comment
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2142 comments in total)
In reply to:

Paul JM: Funny camera to place. I have owned the OMD original now for about a year. I like it, but I hardly use it.
Great camera, but for me it is neither here nor there. Not small enough to put in the pocket, but for me the sensor is just too small to act as my everyday serious camera.
When travelling now, I take the Fuji XE1. In low light, in combination with the wonderful Fuji lenses for me it is a league ahead of the OMD
For serious work, I still use the 5D mk2
If I want something casual to put in my pocket I take the RX100
So, for me, I am struggling to find a role for the Olympus. Great piece of kit, but I see it as being caught in the middle now. This body looks and sounds great, but it is still bridled with that tiny sensor

If we could all collect the whole set, why not, but consider the person who can't afford an expensive FF system and a premium compact as you can. This is less cost and weight than a FF system, yet offers some compelling enthusiast features (like sealed body, dual controls, customizable interface, large viewfinder...) in a very small package. Might be hard to place for you unless you saw a specific use or simply wanted a system camera smaller than your FF setup. No problem if you don't, but I can see why someone might.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 00:16 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2142 comments in total)

To my eyes, this looks like a very good camera for a lot of folks. For those wanting a very high quality carry everywhere camera as a companion to a FF system, it would be great. For those looking for their first enthusiast system camera--also great. For those that value a robust sealed system without the Pro price, or a tilt LCD and large VF that entry level DSLRs lack, good news. Better set of lenses than any other mirrorless camera too. The IQ is competitive to any APS-C camera in real world shooting. Adding excellent 5-axis IS for all lenses (even legacy and macro) may actually mean using lower ISOs than needed on other cameras. It's a much smaller as a system, with small lighter body and lenses without sacrificing ergonomics or control options. No it's not for everyone, but my bet is that for most people who are not wanting the cost, size, and weight of a FF DSLR, this is a serious contender.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 00:06 UTC as 157th comment | 2 replies
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1333 comments in total)

Interesting article. Thanks for testing.

On sensor PDAF will become faster and more common and the accuracy advantage is clearly demonstrated above. Canon and Olympus have made a bold move toward the future with their on sensor PDAF implementations in the 70D and E-M1 and it bodes well for future products.

Posted on Oct 11, 2013 at 11:06 UTC as 106th comment

Wasn't Gaylord commissioned (in other words paid by the USA) to design the artwork? So wasn't he working for them? If so, how can he then sue the USPS, a branch of the organization who hired him and paid him? If I was hired by the any organization or company to do work for them, and they paid me for that work, it would seem that this agreement and payment would cover their use of it--even for profit. I also don't see how it being a small and very modified photography of the image is any different than the way Google and Pinterest side step copyright infringement by claiming they only use a small thumbnail representation to cataloge their images. Some might say that, well, Google and Pinterest don't make money on these thumbnails, but I'd argue that the USPS primarily makes money on people sending stuff and not selling artwork. In other words, a lot of the profit that the USPS made was because someone wanted to send maple sugar candy to grandma in Tulsa.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2013 at 14:15 UTC as 83rd comment
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2142 comments in total)

My 4/3rds lenses will live again. Good job Olympus. 4/3rds zooms, Micro4/3rds primes, about any legacy lens... what an amazing selection of glass is suddenly open to us with dual focus + legacy. My dream set: E-M1, 11-22mm f2.8-3.5, 12-40mm f2.8, 50-200mm f2.8-3.5, 150mm f2, 60mm macro, 45mm f1.8, & Nikkor 400mm f3.5.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 13, 2013 at 02:10 UTC as 322nd comment | 1 reply
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2142 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ayoh: Something seems not quite right here. At all resolution levels including "Print" and "Web" the E-M1 has visually similar noise level (perhaps within 0.5 EV) to the Canon 5D Mark III (within the shadows in particular). Theoretically there should be a 2 stop advantage to the 5d, and even is the E-M1 sensor has better per-pixel S/N performance than the 5d, I would not expect them to be so similar.
Were both sensors really exposed to the same amount of light per sensor area?

It's really amazing how crop sensor cameras have closed the gap. Remember, these are well lit comparisons and FF does have an advantage when pushing a RAW file in tough lighting situations. That said, the difference between APS-C and 4/3rds has shrunk to almost nothing--something that many didn't expect and a few don't believe even when they see it.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 13, 2013 at 02:01 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2142 comments in total)

To me the price of the E-M1 and new lens seems very fair. It's the most "Pro" oriented mirrorless to date and has a multitude of improvements over the much loved E-M5. Little things like sealing, deep buffer (51 RAW), 10 fps, best continuous AF yet from a mirrorless, heavily customized layout, direct button control without looking... all features usually reserved for the higher end bodies. Should be very popular.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 12:00 UTC as 461st comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

DigiPod: Well if nothing else DigiPod has you talking, I created DigiPod, I did it for the same reasons I have a classic Mercedes Convertible (that I bought new!) and a Patek Phillippe watch, I appreciate great design, craftsmanship and quality. I don't seem to be able to buy Kodachrome anymore and found it difficult to get HP4 processed.
I have a cannon 600D that I use ( I still don't use all it offers after 2 years).

I didn't set out to put digipod on a crowdfunding site, I wanted one and no one made one! I have just updated the website http://igg.me/at/digipod/x/4301479 and we now have 89 backers and just short of £12,000 in funding with 27 days left, will we make production, that will be up to the backers, we have a way to go, but every journey starts with a small step.

I thank those of you that have shown support and those that have constructive negative comments, I respect that everyone has an opinion I wish you all the very best & may your God go with you. James

I hope you succeed James. The folks who have never owned a classic film camera and who are saying a DSLR would be cheaper and better just don't get it. Personally, I think making complete digital backs for certain popular SLRs like the OM-1 and FM2 would be a good place to start too. I see Nikon has a patent for one. But this would mean a smaller pool of "backers" to help fund it if going independent. Good luck.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2013 at 10:42 UTC
In reply to:

cgarrard: Inconvenient, who cares. That's the point really. Film was, but now we can develop ourselves. Raw files (dng format especially) would be best then you don't have to worry about white balance. No preview of your images, just reliance on good photography fundamentals without the hassle of film after.

I think if someone makes a full frame one that shoots up to 200 images or more on one charge, it's an instant success. Period.

I'd go get one then go buy some more film cameras tomorrow. It's a great idea, soon as someone does one successfully its going to sell in boat loads and you'll probably see film camera prices go up too. Imagine using a Contax G2 with this. Oooooops!

First cam I'd get is a Contax N or Maxxum 9 Ti, then go have a fricken blast.

C

For me, it would be a Hexar RF, Maxxum 7, and OM-1. It would be a total kick in the pants and I think it would be very successful even today. I do think it would be easier to replace the entire film back though for certain cameras like the OM-1. Having a LCD, slot for a battery and microSD card, and a few controls would be nice. That seems more possible to me.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2013 at 10:21 UTC
On Sony A3000 preview (681 comments in total)

Kind of brilliant. Really affordable for kids, students, first time system users, or those who are intimidated by technology but want the serious looks of a "real" camera. In the USA, people want something that says "I mean business." But they don't really mean business--but they want the image to match their huge pickups and SUVs. This gets them what they want for much cheaper than the competition. Alongside the SL1 and D3000 it might be hard to resist for the masses.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2013 at 11:57 UTC as 192nd comment | 1 reply

Most of the popular SLRs had removable doors on the back. Why not make camera specific removable "film backs?" OM and FM for starters. It seems like it would overcome most challenges except viewfinder crop. (This could be helped by custom focus screens that were also removable).

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2013 at 10:35 UTC as 30th comment | 1 reply
On Olympus stems losses but PEN sales disappoint article (245 comments in total)

Well well well. Release an amazing OMD-Pro to replace the E-5 and we'll see if I can help you recover your losses further. ;)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 20:40 UTC as 76th comment | 3 replies

I would have thought Olympus had patented the 5-axis IS through the roof. Do you think they are sharing with Casio in some joint venture?

Of course this is better than a cell phone, and the super zoom lens dictates a small sensor. There are trade offs for all cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 8, 2013 at 01:40 UTC as 36th comment | 3 replies
On Panasonic GX7 First Impressions Review article (1201 comments in total)

I always wanted an LC1.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 1, 2013 at 11:36 UTC as 357th comment
On 5 Reasons why I haven't used my DSLR for months article (591 comments in total)

It seems to be a timely topic as people start to realize how good smaller system cameras and compacts have become. They are perfect for side kicks to larger systems or total solutions without a great sacrifice in breadth of uses. The venn diagram "convenient" and "capable" are overlapping more and more.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 1, 2013 at 00:22 UTC as 164th comment

Pricey but cool idea. I did a tutorial for youtube last week and this would have made it much easier. I would also like to record some of my classroom lectures--don't know if this is the best idea with a fisheye type lens, but could work. What's the wide angle competition out there?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 1, 2013 at 00:05 UTC as 22nd comment
On 12 stunning photos of Godafoss - Waterfall of the Gods article (78 comments in total)

This page is a tribute to the glory of the changing seasons, the drama of the skies, the beauty of light, and the whining of armchair fauxtographers who can't see past their own big heads. Love JStephane and Vincent's renditions.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2013 at 12:27 UTC as 28th comment | 1 reply

Great screen specs, front and rear cameras for skype, new Android, great price. Yay.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 26, 2013 at 00:12 UTC as 40th comment

Dang, my eyes were closed.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2013 at 01:56 UTC as 20th comment
Total: 186, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »