Johannes Zander: I don't like this camera!
HowaboutRAW,"Have you used it?"
You don't have to use something to not like something.
Terry Cioni: The AF is very fast..shot to shot very fast. It is SMALL.
Not a perfect interface but better than some others out there.
My experience with PZ10-30mm/30-110mm/18.5mm/10mm/6.7-13mm is I get sharp images. I wish you could sit here with me and review the Italian Day shoot on Commercial Dr. in Vancouver. The not so sharp images are ME..not the camera.
I can never tell much about sharpness from looking at images I post to flickr or elsewhere on the Internet so I rarely make judgements about sharpness from looking at 'net' posted images. But on my 27" Mac monitor the V3 images are sharp. HONEST!
It is expensive - but that is Nikon's issue not mine. It is worth mentioning sure - but that just says it is to expensive for my pay grade or budget - but not much else.
It is NOT a high ISO camera. My experience is 800 ISO after that you will need to do some post processing noise management and we know what happens to image detail when go down that road.
PS. I have and love the RX10.
tkbslc， Even if you could spend $1200, but if you are not willing, then it's too expensive for you.
Dezzza: Who will take this camera to shoot with JPG? It'a not a smartphone.
Dezzza :"I even can not understand people to buy top level in class camera and not take an advantage of RAW files"
You have to understand not everyone who buys an off-road vehicle goes off road.
bobbarber: "The K-3 is a very likeable addition to what was once a really interesting sector of the market..."
True enough--a nice camera, but this sector of the market is not where the most interesting innovations are happening today.
Full-frame mirrorless, 4K video, etc. trump what is at heart just another well-spec'ed and well-performing APS-C DSLR.
Of course, if the shoe fits, this is a great camera. I would certainly be happy shooting with one!
Who cares if you guys have interest or no interest in switching systems.Does anyone care?
Dpreviewmember: it's just me or the OMD M1 jpegs, up to iso 3200 & 6400 look nicer than K3 and X-T1 in the image comparison tool, contrary to what the review conclusion says.Is it referring to Raw ?
Underdog 3000 “Who shoots Jpeg?”
The majority！Much much more than you realize。
OM-G, for O My God?
Mike FL: FWIW:
D610 has the same oil spot issue as D600 as seen in users' Review. It seems a QC issue plus bad design.
BTW: D610 has more other issue than D600.
I will wait for D620.
“I will wait for D620.” D620 won't have any issues? keep on dreaming and waiting...
zodiacfml: I'll take this for the price of a nexus 7
"a processor that no one knows any details of. "
You don't know, and you assume it's not good, how logical.
joe6pack: "five full days of continuous use"? What's their definition of "continuous use"? With the screen off 80% of the time?
Well, the phone functions continuously regardless whether the screen is on or off, and that is the important point. And if it lasts that long, it's significant for a device of this type.
ozgoldman: China is a bit of a law unto itself. They do not respect patents etc. I avoid Chinese products like the plague, especially food stuffs. I have been tempted at times to buy from China on line, but once bitten, forever shy.
I am sure the Chinese products avoid you like the black plague too!
royt84: Since when has China started to protect consumers?
Just started，with a big bang！
From the pictures shown, the whole package appears to be kinda clumsy, with disproportionately large external view finder, huge lens hood, and flimsy dinky flash...LCD screen about to drop off the back, what a weird contraception.
How would it play out in real action, I wonder. What do you say?
VaLeX: Why on Earth didn't Canon make this camera weather-sealed weather-proof or any other resistance to light rain, dust and sand? With such a sensor and lens, this would be the camera to take on world trip!
You still can take it on world trips.
Failed to show the "subject".
It's just a plain ripoff.
Alex Permit: For me, a "satisfying photographic experience" is taking photos and then being satisfied with the results when i look and/or print them at home.
The images i get from my rx100 ii are satisfying, while those from my previous powershots/Lumix/ et al are not. I know of no other POCKETABLE camera that gives pictures which satisfy but for the rx 100.
DPR's objective tests back up my subjective views.
The "user experience" of the rx 100 does not match my x100s, or even my nex 6. Those cameras, however, don't fit in my pants pocket. Neither does my D3s. So what. Each camera size class fits a purpose.
The rx100 is, imho, a clear gold star.
"By DaveE1 (3 months ago)@Boky, I had two RX100II's in my short pockets recently, as I minded one for a friend who was swimming. What's supposed to happen?
Are you talking about boxer shorts? If so, why would you want to put a camera into your underwear?"
To keep the camera warm so the battery would last longer.
Richard Franiec: Possibly the most boring camera segment of the year 2013.
"By Richard Franiec (33 min ago)What I'm saying is that DSLR's seems to be the slowest advancing segment. Solid but hardly exciting in comparison to models from previous few years."
This segment has long reached the plateau phase of development. Do you expect rapid advancement when a product line has matured? Be realistic.
whtchocla7e: Why the big lens? I would've liked to see the rx100 lens/sensor combo in this Nikon body.
Flagship + superzoom just doesn't compute..
Because it covers the most used range in general photography, for which this camera is intended.
rhlpetrus: Why can't Nikon put a 1 sensor in this body?
Simple, won't fit.
GabrielZ: Canon's G series compacts need an EVF to replace their awful optical one's.
Well, at least it doesn't suck up the battery.