Sakura Sakura

Sakura Sakura

Joined on Jun 15, 2012

Comments

Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9

Yawn

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2016 at 12:42 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply

Ooh look! even more of the same!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 14:11 UTC as 45th comment
On article Enthusiast mirrorless camera roundup (2014) (316 comments in total)

I was looking over some recent images taken with my prehistoric Olympus EPL1. I doubt very much if you would notice much of a difference between an ELP1 print & that of most modern mirrorless.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2014 at 14:29 UTC as 54th comment | 6 replies

I suspect in a year or two's time this Nikon 1 Series business model won't be much aclaimed either

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2013 at 15:25 UTC as 69th comment

Seems to me Nikon are misjudging & overpricing the Nikon 1 system. I just don't get it, the 4/3 system just as compact, cheaper & probably better image quality. In case you think I have a downer on Nikon I have a Nikon DSLR & love it.

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2013 at 14:12 UTC as 78th comment | 3 replies
On article Canon EOS M hands-on preview (563 comments in total)

Yet another camera without a viewfinder, when will these manufacturers take on board that LCD screens are useless in bright sunlight?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2012 at 11:42 UTC as 158th comment
In reply to:

tkbslc: Everyone keeps whining about f5.6 vs f6.3. That's not even quite a third of a stop. It would mean the difference between shooting ISO 800 and ISO 966. You'd likely need a microscope to spot the DOF differences.

@T3 It's remarkable that you seem to infer & find so much amusement from the single self evident statement that a slower lens may not be so quick to focus.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 16, 2012 at 13:45 UTC
In reply to:

tkbslc: Everyone keeps whining about f5.6 vs f6.3. That's not even quite a third of a stop. It would mean the difference between shooting ISO 800 and ISO 966. You'd likely need a microscope to spot the DOF differences.

Not about DOF, expect more focus hunting at lower light levels

Direct link | Posted on Jun 15, 2012 at 18:39 UTC

Sigma's pushing of a thermally stable composite sounds to me like a solution to a problem that does not exist & smacks of marketing desperation. Not to mention an f6.3 aperture at the long end. Nothing new to see here, move along.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 15, 2012 at 12:17 UTC as 31st comment | 3 replies
Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9