Tiefenunschärfe

Lives in Germany Germany
Joined on Jul 25, 2010

Comments

Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14

Light mode looks like imaging-resource.com: Bäääh !!!

Link | Posted on Jun 25, 2016 at 04:56 UTC as 99th comment
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1084 comments in total)

Very good for stills, but video is halfhearted.

Link | Posted on May 18, 2016 at 18:09 UTC as 190th comment
In reply to:

Tiefenunschärfe: Finally Canon did it!!!

See here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony

Link | Posted on May 11, 2016 at 08:05 UTC

Finally Canon did it!!!

Link | Posted on May 11, 2016 at 06:44 UTC as 21st comment | 5 replies
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2126 comments in total)

dpreview, you forgot at cons: no IBIS!

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2016 at 16:01 UTC as 129th comment | 7 replies
On article Hands on: Sony FE 50mm F1.8 and 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 (137 comments in total)

Boring.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 12:41 UTC as 17th comment
On article CP+ 2016: Hands-on with new Sigma SD cameras and lenses (308 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Davinator: Can we please get rid of the "I own it, I wamt it I Had it" buttons? They obviously mean nothing.

"I had it" is a typo.

Meant ist "I hate it".

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2016 at 19:26 UTC
On article CP+ 2016: Hands-on with Nikon DL compacts (319 comments in total)

The DL24-85 is a little bit to thick for my trousers - obviously not pocketable.

A great disadvantage to the Sony RX100.

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2016 at 05:56 UTC as 75th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Boomanbb: Wait, no one has calculated "equivalence" for APSC? I imagine the "total light gathering" of this beast must be F1.2 or better! We can really get those extreme low light shots now! Equilavence works both ways right? LOL

It´s really hard to understand equivalence, isn´t it?

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2016 at 14:24 UTC
On article Otus Readings: the Zeiss 85 F1.4 Otus Comparison (224 comments in total)
In reply to:

photominion: Can someone tell me how it is that people are willing to spend 3'000-4'000 $ for a camera body that is technically obsolete after 2 years and are NOT ever going to be willing to spend 4 grand on a lens that will last them 10 to 20 years without it being qualitatively surpassed by any other in that time span?

Might be the same thing with ppl spending 4 grand on a flat screen Tv and then buying a 200$ "home theater surround system" even though audio components will last 20 years whereas the Tv value drops 50% per year..

Which combi delivers more resolution?

D700 with Otus 85mm or
D800 with Nikkor 85 f 1.8?

Look here

http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Carl-Zeiss/Zeiss-Carl-Zeiss-Apo-Planar-T-Star-Otus-85mm-F14-ZF2-Nikon-mounted-on-Nikon-D700__441

and here

http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Nikon/Nikon-AF-Nikkor-85mm-F18D-mounted-on-Nikon-D800__792

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 17:50 UTC
On article Otus Readings: the Zeiss 85 F1.4 Otus Comparison (224 comments in total)
In reply to:

photominion: Can someone tell me how it is that people are willing to spend 3'000-4'000 $ for a camera body that is technically obsolete after 2 years and are NOT ever going to be willing to spend 4 grand on a lens that will last them 10 to 20 years without it being qualitatively surpassed by any other in that time span?

Might be the same thing with ppl spending 4 grand on a flat screen Tv and then buying a 200$ "home theater surround system" even though audio components will last 20 years whereas the Tv value drops 50% per year..

The 4000$ body is much better than the 400$ body.

The 4000$ lens ist not significantly better than the 400$ lens

(btw: it has not even AF).

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 15:11 UTC
On article Otus Readings: the Zeiss 85 F1.4 Otus Comparison (224 comments in total)

@ the testers of depreview

You should have focused manually with the Nikon 85 f1.8 also.

Then you would have recognized that there ist much less purple fringing with this lens wide open (in the focus plane!!) than your test picture shows.

Your combo (Nikon D810 with Nikkor 85 1.8) seems to have a slight back focus.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 07:01 UTC as 22nd comment

No reason to be concerned.

They are only splitting out "Video & Sound" and NOT "Imaging Products & Solutions" !

see here: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/201502/15-017E/index.html

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2015 at 08:13 UTC as 31st comment | 7 replies
On Challenge:5860 (17 comments in total)

The rules still say (and everything else is unfair) that the picture must show the full sun.

Therefore every picture that does not show the full sun will only receive 0.5 stars from me.

Posted on Dec 18, 2012 at 15:35 UTC as 1st comment
Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14