robmanueb

robmanueb

Lives in New Zealand (Aotearoa) bay of islands, New Zealand (Aotearoa)
Works as a mini lab manager
Joined on Feb 26, 2009

Comments

Total: 101, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

So much in these photos. Thanks for posting.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 2, 2014 at 11:49 UTC as 13th comment
In reply to:

absentaneous: a theft is something that causes someone real damages not fictional ones.

if I take your car then in order for you to have a car you'll have to get another car. that will cost you money.

if from your website I copy a photo you took of your car and use it on my website it won't cost you a penny because the photo of the car will still remain on your website. all you might lose is fictional income that is based on the presumption that I would buy that photo if I couldn't just copy it for free.

of course it's still morally wrong but it's not a theft but more like improper use.

I think contracted customers 'extending' the licence can suck. That isn't the same as Joe public playing with low res images that are in the public domain.

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 09:02 UTC
In reply to:

Daniel Bliss: Wow, it's getting hard to remember the last time I saw a patent diagram of something that ought to be patentable! Bravo Apple!

Now, about that ridiculous patent on round corners . . .

I tell you why you patent, it is greed. Companies that are manufacturing giants don't need a patent, patent are for two purposes to get a design made if you are a small time inventor and to collect royalties. Apple doesn't need a patent to use this technology, once they start making it they have the rights to make it through prior art. Patents are just there to stop anyone else making it. Car companies are good example of an industry that doens't care about patents, they care about producing cars not lawsuits. The Apple and Samsung war has highlited the corrupt way that lawyers make money from copyright trolling, this has nothing to do with making money from building products which they could easily do.

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 02:28 UTC
In reply to:

Daniel Bliss: Wow, it's getting hard to remember the last time I saw a patent diagram of something that ought to be patentable! Bravo Apple!

Now, about that ridiculous patent on round corners . . .

Why?

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 00:18 UTC
On Light Field Cameras - Focusing on the Future article (133 comments in total)

Wow.

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 09:53 UTC as 28th comment
In reply to:

Daniel Bliss: Wow, it's getting hard to remember the last time I saw a patent diagram of something that ought to be patentable! Bravo Apple!

Now, about that ridiculous patent on round corners . . .

If it is 'derserving' of a patent they should just make it and not try to stop someone else using it. That goes for most companies and most patents.

Direct link | Posted on May 11, 2014 at 00:08 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (634 comments in total)

Nice camera. Should take good pictures.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 23:15 UTC as 77th comment
In reply to:

aqasem: 24-85mm @ 1.8-2.4f would be great!

15-50 f3.5-5.6

Direct link | Posted on Apr 29, 2014 at 04:44 UTC
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

paulski66: Well, on the plus side, at least we won't have to read any more posts from all the Pentax fanboys complaining "Where's the K-3 review?" every time DPReview posts a review of any other camera.

Holy bitchin pentaxians batman!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 10:25 UTC
In reply to:

Timo Voivalin: Hope this will give us more zooms which start from 16 mm.

Hopefully this will give us a cheap prime around 10-12mm. Dreams are free I know.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 12, 2014 at 03:12 UTC
In reply to:

Henry M. Hertz: i have nothing against video in a DSLR.. but i don´t buy a DSLR for it´s video features.

i wonder if sony should not put more effort in developing lenses......

The D in DSLR isn't required any more. Apart from the Nikon F6 all SLRs are digital these days... :)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 6, 2014 at 23:19 UTC
In reply to:

ThomasSwitzerland: The present exponential camera output craze will sort out sooner or later.

Maybe advanced cell phones will dominate the race in the markets. Cell phones with superior RAW and on screen tweaking present a strong danger to the common manufacturers of cameras. On my walks I suffer from the present loads with cameras, lenses, bags … The old world experience with roots to the era of film.

Cell phones will enable us to produce quite serious picture output in the near future. Talking less and imaging more. Pictures speak louder than words.

I went from D40 to D90 to compact. My next cam will be a cell phone, probably four to five years away as it will need to keep up with the compact I have now, shouldn't be too hard a task for the manufacturers. Never used RAW never will.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 25, 2014 at 00:26 UTC
On Hands-on with the GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition article (209 comments in total)
In reply to:

Biowizard: Thanks for posting SOMETHING about the latest GoPro, but this is NOT a proper review - rather an enthusiastic biker/"hockey" player's personal thoughts about his latest glory-recorder.

Even though they are primarily about video, not stills, I would LOVE to see a proper comparative review of the main action-cam contenders, using normal DpReview standards - and comparing them (say) to the ruggedised compact options from Olympus, Canon, Pentax, etc.

Brian

Or even a list of specs. Lens specs specifically.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 22, 2014 at 01:45 UTC
In reply to:

parkmcgraw: 3 of 3

The camera body offerings today, somewhat analogous to how a fledgling and or pretentious cook, as appose to a skilful chef, creates a "what is that" sort of desert, not being knowable or skillful enough in the arts to produce a basic though very high quality cake or seasoned pie with ice cream.

In closing, please STOP removing basic system hardware functions and or options without first insuring that what is being selected to be the replacement item is superior on most all respects to the predecessor.

Do a job, big or small, do it right or not at all.

Park McGraw

I really like my Nikon P7100, the more I use it the better it gets. Having an optical viewfinder is far superior to looking at the screen. My old Canon powershot A540 that ticked all the boxes but low light ability wasn't up to scratch after ISO 200, the P7100 does ISO400 and still looks good which is a generational improvement as far as I'm concerned, it has a longer zoom then the old Canon and goes wider. What blows me away is that I had to wait 7 years for those minor improvements and then the next model (P7200) dropped the optical viewfinder. Camera manufacturers are in deep trouble with the amount of overlap between devices that can take good images. M4/3 and most of the interchangeable lens cams are probably going to be history as soon as people realise they can get good quality without the bulk of changeable lenses. In 7 years we will probably have full frame, a smidgen of APS and cell phones. (and then I'll pick up a second hand SLR kit a la D90 styles for spare change).

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2014 at 03:06 UTC
In reply to:

Retzius: Is this the same company that got sued for blatantly copying the Nikon 1 series? It seems they have now blatantly copied Sony's QX?

Does JK actually do anything other than copying designs?

@Richard Franciec.
Have you been a victim of piracy? Your belief that products evolve without evolution and just spring out of thin air is almost as dumb as fundamental religious types spouting off about creationism.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 12, 2014 at 21:33 UTC
In reply to:

Boerseuntjie: Good photography products Kodak... LOL, hey Samsung needs some competition on the bottom of the totem pole....LOL.

Hell yes. Mass production of high quality camera kit can only be good for the consumer. A lot of comments are quite positive and I know why, price. Who doesn't want to pick up a bargain M4/3 body? The quality will always be in the lenses bodies come and go. M4/3 needs to give away bodies for free or as close to it, that way people will experiment and buy lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2014 at 22:42 UTC
On Nikon Df Review preview (1618 comments in total)
In reply to:

photosen: Baby boomer trophy camera? Nothing wrong with that, particularly if they recycled existing parts. For those of us who never really worked with film era cameras, we can just shrug and move on. On a more practical note *for me*: that 6D keeps looking good!

I point out the fascination for simpler controls and I'm a Df fanboy. I go on to explain how I think people feel about the camera IE nice but pricey and it becomes why people don't like the camera? I don't think people dislike the camera, it is selling well, if people don't want it they will buy something else, why would anyone hate a consumer item?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 22, 2013 at 07:01 UTC
On Nikon Df Review preview (1618 comments in total)
In reply to:

photosen: Baby boomer trophy camera? Nothing wrong with that, particularly if they recycled existing parts. For those of us who never really worked with film era cameras, we can just shrug and move on. On a more practical note *for me*: that 6D keeps looking good!

Feeling I get from the comments is that a lot people here are intrigued with ANY attempts at simplifying the digital photography experience, most from people who use their cameras a lot and realize how awkward current menu systems are to alter on the fly. Many here would love to try it out even though the price puts it out of touch.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2013 at 23:28 UTC
On Nikon Df Review preview (1618 comments in total)

Lovely bit of kit. Congrats to Nikon to getting this out inspite of the earthquake, tsunami and flooding they had to deal with. An exclusive purpose built SLR without the BS of video, luckily it is selling so we may see another generation and hopefully further specialisation towards photography.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2013 at 23:07 UTC as 131st comment
In reply to:

QuarterToDoom: For all of you who think Nikon is right, here's one for you. This goes beyond ridiculous.

I couldn't upload to the galleries for some reason (gave me errors) so had to upload it to my server.

http://192.99.1.212/polaroid-vs-nikon.jpg

Patents and copyrights are just a way to abuse your dominant position. Samsung and Apple are the classic example of how this BS slows innovation and punishes the consumer. Car companies are very good examples of industries that have it 'right' they are more interested in producing cars that work cheaply enough for people to buy them and not worry about the shape of the cars that the opposition makes.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2013 at 02:46 UTC
Total: 101, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »