robmanueb

50/50 for me. The good ones were very good though. Good enough for me to read the article. I think I might have even learnt something.

I think the photos are impressive, regardless of how, who or when they were taken. If you had posted those images I would have been complementary and suggested you keep at it as you obviously had...

I bought a D90 when I could have got a D300. It was several hundred dollars cheaper at the time and image quality was as good if not better even if the ergonomics weren't. Price is a huge deciding...

Flagship DX, priced and labelled accordingly as a prosumer camera.

With first class post, fragile stickers and this way up arrows^ maybe. Though I though it was odd myself.

Potential collectors will get a contract spelling out exactly what it is they are buying. Hang on they already do, if they don't then they are mugs like Sobel.

I think they're doing some more phone camera reviews first... Followed by same stories about security cameras and camera bags.

Maybe they will start slowly producing this kind of lens hoping that over the next couple of years high ISO quality will improve enough to make them useful. If they can brighten the optics or add...

I want a 10-200mm equivalent. Settle for a 10-anything really. Give you $300.

I want a 10-200mm equivalent. Settle for a 10-anything really. Give you $300.

Cool camera though, you're right.

I smoke whatever I can lay my hands on. It's why I have a sense of humor. BTW add the optical viewfinder to the Nikon and the price will be around US$1500. It's free with the Minox. I realise the...

Nikon Coolpix A killer. Faster lens, quarter of the price and it has an optical viewfinder.

Obsoletist attitude. The ability to film invisibly has been around for decades, soon it will be ubiquitous.

A simple water mark is all it takes or just putting your name at the bottom...

Not at all. This is a spurious case that annoys judges everywhere. It's hardly a crime in fact it's a breach of contract, a minor civil offense in reality the station wouldn't bother going to court...

Copyright trolls hold back progress. They might find it "valuable", society doesn't. Well said JohnyP. So many people here think rocking the boat on peoples business model is crime, get a grip....

Copyright infringement is just that infringing on someones right to make money, it is a business concept. It has nothing to do with "crime". Go to the police next time someone "steals" your image...

I bet the staff at the station wouldn't know what an EXIF file was if it came up and bit them. A LOT of photographers don't know what EXIF is, for that matter.

For people who care about photography, want to use something better than a cell phone and not have to carry a brick. IE competes with the Canon S range.

@ Nick Kessler
I find Ken and Thom equally useful and equally annoying. I will have to have a look at Lloyd Chambers site, thanks for the tip.
I bought a D40, D90, 18-200 and SB400 mostly on Ken's...