abi170845

Lives in Indonesia Indonesia
Joined on Nov 5, 2010

Comments

Total: 160, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Lens shootout: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition (417 comments in total)
In reply to:

abi170845: I'd rather get a new 100-400mk1 L for the same price.

Ethan,check my gear,hayah.

Link | Posted on May 28, 2016 at 04:31 UTC
On article Lens shootout: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition (417 comments in total)

I'd rather get a new 100-400mk1 L for the same price.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 07:37 UTC as 66th comment | 4 replies
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1941 comments in total)
In reply to:

abi170845: Wouldn't a person be more interested in buying quality lenses than a DSLR?

What I am saying is there is a bunch of "pro" bodies on sale second mint etc that has lost so much of their value, go and check how much a mint d810 or like new with warranty cost? Compare that to the price of 1.4 G series lenses.

Link | Posted on May 17, 2016 at 06:09 UTC
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1941 comments in total)

Wouldn't a person be more interested in buying quality lenses than a DSLR?

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 02:22 UTC as 64th comment | 11 replies

Go for the Godox barebulbs and the AD600

Link | Posted on May 12, 2016 at 15:26 UTC as 1st comment

Lee should also make reverse grads and strip filters for the sw150.

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2016 at 00:29 UTC as 2nd comment

Okay, how about battery life? I get over 1000 shots with my dslr. Do you offer radio trigger for flash? Third party TTL flash from phottix etc? Ultra wide lens like the Canon 11mm zoom? How is your after sales service and spare parts? or is this part of BATA (Buy and throw away) product?

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2016 at 01:55 UTC as 13th comment | 4 replies

Yeah sure just like the A mount huh?

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 05:48 UTC as 23rd comment
On article 1.4 and More: Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II comparison (242 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hibiscusbloom: Maybe I am just ignorant but why are they putting in so much resources in making a 35mm lens? They are getting not getting any smaller and remain big and chunky. A PJ's lens should always be small and as light as possible.

get a leica then.

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2016 at 00:34 UTC
On article 1.4 and More: Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II comparison (242 comments in total)
In reply to:

dynamics4u: Dear DP-Review: Thanks for a truely excellent lense comparison (&comparison tool). Very objective.

Dear readers, I did the jump over the $$$ fence of the EF 35mm f1.4 Lii one day prior to my trip to Scottland end of last year as I knew I wanted to have a high performance lense for the low light indoor images in some of the Wiskey Distilleries.
Low Light, available indoor light images with this lense have not been in this nor in the D.Abott review recently, nor are images simple to find on the web on this lense, yet.
For the sake of sharing with the community find some examples here:
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/5583205170

Note 1: All Images Not postprocessed, without Flash, without tripod
Note 2: The Wiskey Casks with RAW in Lr and with Dark-Contrast variation, blew my mind what the EOS6D and 35mm could achieve, as one can see back wall (lighten up) or vary the DOF effect of the casks perspective depth via adjusting (darken down). Better than human eye.
Enjoy

Exactly! I am STILL waiting for a copy to pop up at my local store, I am in Jakarta Indonesia and the sole distributor Datascrip has been extremely lacking updates to new Canon products such as the M10, the G9X, the G5X, I think they better just let somebody else import Canon products. In Singapore it has been out sins mid October 2015!2015! 3 months ago!

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2016 at 00:39 UTC
On article 1.4 and More: Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II comparison (242 comments in total)

A lot of people are missing the point. It is not all about sharpness. If one is going to buy the Canon 35mm Mk2, it is for shooting wide open under low light or to stop motion, I don't see the point of using this lens under good light. Why spend all that money for an 1.4 if not using it at that aperture 95% of the time.

Thus, it is also the focusing performance, at 1.4 under low light and less than ideal light(indoors etc). So we must compare the focusing performance of the Canon against Sigma and Tamron under low light and the focusing accuracy of all lenses under real life condition.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 04:12 UTC as 40th comment
On article 1.4 and More: Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II comparison (242 comments in total)
In reply to:

maximme: this review convinced me to get the Sigma today !

When you get your Sigma, try it under low light such as indoors.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 04:07 UTC
On article In Fine Detail: Canon EOS 5DS / 5DS R In-Depth Review (728 comments in total)
In reply to:

bigdaddave: There are some dreadfully amateur comments here.

The 5DS/R's are professional tools, to be used by people who know what they are doing. For those users these are almost perfect products because they know how to light and how to use dslr's the way THEY need to get their jobs done.

Sonys and Nikons are great too but for a Canon using pro these are superb tools

Different strokes for different folks. But no 11mm zoom from Nikon, buhuuhuhu

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2015 at 09:35 UTC

I got the cheap Canon m2 for 200 bucks on Amazon. Lucky I already collected mint 11mmzoom, 22mm and the 18mm zoom when the person selling them thought the M was dead.

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2015 at 09:34 UTC as 64th comment
In reply to:

SushiEater: Mercedes Benz is build the same way but you need to buy two of them. One keep in garage and one to drive. All of this over engineered stuff doesn't prove anything just cost too much. At the end of the day Sigma 35mm F1.4 is better. And you can buy two of them for the price of one Canon.

Price isn't everything. My friend's Sigma struggles during low light, totally frustrating. He is selling it to get the new Canon. Poor man always pays twice.

Link | Posted on Dec 12, 2015 at 12:59 UTC

Ken Rockwell needs to rewrite his review regarding this lens where he said it is mostly made of plastic. Obviously he didn't see the innards of this lens.

Link | Posted on Dec 12, 2015 at 07:14 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply
On article Samsung NX1 Review (1256 comments in total)
In reply to:

wanderingtrails: How does the electronic viewfinder measure up? I've never seen an EVF that I even remotely like.

I tried it at the store, not really great. I was purchasing the new Canon 430 EX III RT and the Sony, Fuji and Samsung NX1 was on demo. I like the original Sony A7 actually, my wife liked the Fuji XT. I enjoyed handling the NX-1 but for that price I'd go for FF the Sony or 6d and a mint Sony A7 is only about 800 bucks, save the rest for a mint second hand lens.

Link | Posted on Dec 6, 2015 at 02:02 UTC

Great! just arrived at my local camera store.Will be getting the receiver to mix hot shoe flash with studio lights, thank you Phottix. Dump your Pocket Wizards on Ebay.

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2015 at 04:19 UTC as 5th comment

I can print a2 fine arts with my local print shop for about 45 dollars on hahnemuhle fine arts baryta and i can get a discount to about 40 dollars per print if i print 5 or more and even more discount if i print 10 or more and this includes test prints and touch up on l.r until i get it rigt. So for the price of the canon printer and complete set of xtra inks(2000 dollars) i can get 50 prints withou the headache of calibration and wasted papers.

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2015 at 06:18 UTC as 4th comment | 3 replies

So what will happen to the S lenses? Will the price goes down to 70 percent?

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2015 at 10:26 UTC as 16th comment | 1 reply
Total: 160, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »