Tord S Eriksson

Tord S Eriksson

Lives in Sweden Gothenburg, Sweden
Works as a busdriver/journalist
Joined on Jul 3, 2003
About me:

Like to draw, paint, and photograph nature, and identified
flying 'objects', like the moon, bumblebees, aircraft, and, not least, birds!

Comments

Total: 398, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photomonkey: Oh! the joyful buzz of the photo drone...

The screaming drone rotors, you mean ;-)!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 21:41 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

Apewithacamera: Apparently, drones are great for taking landscape photos at public beaches. Who's getting theirs?

Are they legal to be sued like that on a public beach?!

I doubt that is the case anywhere, for numerous reasons, from the dangers involved, to incursion into people's private lives.

I wouldn't be surprised if it is only the authorities that are allowed to do such things, in most countries, anyway.

In the UK a guy flew his camera-equipped drone near a military installation when it went out of control and got fined over $5,000! In most countries you need a permit, to begin with, and then follow the regulations!

And you need to have a good insurance as well!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 21:39 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)

'Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio'

Seems there is a total lack of real news at DPreview just now so they dig up whatever they can find in their wastebasket!

What about the noise, what about the studio's insurance, does it really cover models being sliced, cut, and minced by a drone?! Or models having gotten tinnitus from the infernal racket?!

I love drones, and RC planes in general, but one that is totally controlled by a computer is an insurer's nightmare! Are they even legal to use in a studio?! What does the EPA say?!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 21:28 UTC as 22nd comment | 1 reply
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

Artpt: Cool....the underlying value is how robots can adapt to movement patterns and body position.....for a studio, applying a zero-point scooter and pneumatic lift with these algorithms would likely be more accepted in a closed space...

My point here is that the core technology can have an unprecedented impact when placed on a blank and open application canvas and given the room to grow...

FYI...Kleinrock, J.C.R. Licklider and Lawrence Roberts of MIT presented the first packet the first packet switched network in 1969....in 1971 it was conceived that the packets could be a form of electronic mailing to a growing number of universities......yadda...yadda...

DPR, please continue to push your boundaries and expand interests with other audiences...please also consult with MIT to create an app for your site...to filter out all the distracting negative comments....the humorous ones I would leave intact...those are fun read over...

Why not a little RC car carrying the stuff instead of a noisy drone?! Potentially dangerous as well!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 21:21 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: In the future, one drone will take a photo, of another drone acting as the model, while a third drone hovers around with the lights.

You can file this nonsense under "we did it to prove it could be done, and we think it is very cool."

The fourth drone takes the video!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 21:19 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

Scottelly: I wonder how they're going to mount the softbox.

A white airship with a LED array inside would make a perfect softbox!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 21:18 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

bgbs: Wow I pitch that idea a year ago, and look its finally coming to fruition.

Where did you pitch it?!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 21:17 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

citizenlouie: This is more useful to me than a drone camera. I like the fact it tracks my position instead of me having to control just one more equipment. Always hate off-the-camera flash, because the need to carry one more tripod. (imagine this and do a 4-hour hiking). This should be interesting, if affordable then I might get one. Great new use of drone. Wish I could have thought of that.

This drone here was connected with a cord to the mains, to power the lamp (I guess), and you need a computer as well, another big weight (a generator would break your back, to begin with).

Not very portable I'd say!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 21:17 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

Vitruvius: If you have ever been close to one of these (and the model obviosly would be) you would know how incredibly loud they are, not to mention the obvious danger of getteing seriously injury from the blades. And you will be changing batteries every 20 to 30 minutes. Otherwise great idea though.

These guys were connected by a cord, so batteries not needed!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 21:13 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)

Oh, I see it now: Obama surrounded by whirring drones, each carrying a torch, to light up the president, each connected to 'his' own photographer, and then hell breaks loose as the drones crash into each other!

Why not use a regular studio lighting?! Soundless, not very dangerous (drones can go out of control easily, shedding propeller blades in the process!).

LED panels are even better, come to think of it!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 21:12 UTC as 23rd comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1282 comments in total)
In reply to:

trunksye: Why wouldn't one choose a combo like: Olympus M43+ lens 75-300mm? That's 150-600mm equivalent. I know there is this aperture factor, but the large sensor and better iso compensate a bit for this. And you get the flexibility of switching lens...

Yeah, for me the FZ1000 seems to be a better offer than the RX10, even if the RX10 has a classy feeling!

I do very little video, I hasten to add!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 9, 2014 at 10:15 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1282 comments in total)
In reply to:

Markol: I've been a huge fan of Jeff for many years but the final thoughts he put together destroy much of his reputation IMHO.
While I'm not at all against this camera, an enthusiast would never argue that he doesn't print large anyway so the inferior IQ is ok when going on a once in a lifetime holiday.
But amazon will be happy with the text, that's for sure.

I've ended up with a mix I like, using 18-1080mm (equivalent) lenses on my Nikon 1 system in good light (including under a clear sky after sunset), but switching to my FX camera in low light, high contrast, situations. And for landscape, if that is my mission of the day!

Inferior IQ is often claimed for the 1" cameras, but the stunningly good shots I've taken, and other people take, with the new 70-300CX, simply isn't possible with any FX gear a non-millionaire can afford (where can you buy a 200-800 lens, to begin with, at any price?!).

And well treated, including some PP, the new V3 has shown to be a very good performer, with little noise up to ISO 3200.

I've handled the RX10, but, sadly, that was tiring to carry round (the grip wasn't made for my hand, that's for sure), and I prefer to be able to clean the dust off the sensor myself, not paying a lot for someone else to do it for me (how much would that cost for a RX10, a couple of hundred dollars — probably more?!).

Direct link | Posted on Jul 9, 2014 at 10:00 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1282 comments in total)
In reply to:

beavertown: LOL!

Another 1" camera's IQ beats the shxt out of the V3.

Only idiots buy the V3 for 1200 bucks.

OH?! So this is sh*t IQ?!

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53972239?image=0

and the following images ...

I think not!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 9, 2014 at 09:11 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1282 comments in total)
In reply to:

trunksye: Why wouldn't one choose a combo like: Olympus M43+ lens 75-300mm? That's 150-600mm equivalent. I know there is this aperture factor, but the large sensor and better iso compensate a bit for this. And you get the flexibility of switching lens...

My wife had that lens, with her E-M5, and the number of correctly focused shots was so low that she upgraded to a Pentax K-30 + HD DA55-300, a superb combination, with very fast, and correct focus, all the time! The latter combination costs as much as she paid for the Olympus lens alone (since reduced in price). Perfect BIF (birds in flight) package!

The Nikon V3 and the 70-300CX (aka 1 VR 70-300) runs rings around both, but that is a costlier combination! But it is also a 200-800 equivalent lens, and superbly sharp!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 9, 2014 at 09:06 UTC
On _DSC4085 photo in Tord S Eriksson's photo gallery (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

Miki Nemeth: Hey Tord,
This is a very interesting photo. I taped the flash-shoe lid exactly like you. What make of WIDE lens did you put on your 10mm lens? How do you like it? You have the 6.7–13mm either? Which one is better?
I am very much interested in your story that led You to buy a D600. As far as I understood, you had the V1 and you liked it so much that, you bought the FT-1 adapter and FX lenses, then a D600 as complementary body for your V1. Right?
All the Best and Thank You,
Miki

And the wide adapter is a Panasonic DMW-GWC1, which is taped directly to the front of the 10 lens (without the quick-change adaters that came with the Panasonic lens), as then the lens ends up to far from the 10. As a washer in-between I used a 49-52mm step ring (not screwed into anything)! Works great!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 9, 2014 at 08:25 UTC
On _DSC4085 photo in Tord S Eriksson's photo gallery (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

Miki Nemeth: Hey Tord,
This is a very interesting photo. I taped the flash-shoe lid exactly like you. What make of WIDE lens did you put on your 10mm lens? How do you like it? You have the 6.7–13mm either? Which one is better?
I am very much interested in your story that led You to buy a D600. As far as I understood, you had the V1 and you liked it so much that, you bought the FT-1 adapter and FX lenses, then a D600 as complementary body for your V1. Right?
All the Best and Thank You,
Miki

Hi,

Not often I check my gallery, sorry about the tardy response!

First, yes, that's the way it was: I got the V1 (now a V2 as well), and that slowly progressed to a D3200 (didn't really like it) and ended up with a D600! Sold almost all my Pentax stuff to finance the deal, not sorry for a bit!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 9, 2014 at 07:59 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (432 comments in total)
In reply to:

kadardr: Why do I like the Nikon 1 system? It has a unique mix of characteristics.
1. Unobtrusive design, pretends to be a small P&S. No attention drawer.
2. Totally noiseless operation with the electronic shutter. Stealth shooting, great candids.
3. Blazing fast AF, which is also very accurate, if you choose the right method depending on the situation. (actually the small sensor does not require the accuracy of an FX system)
4.Bewilderingly fast burst mode.
5. Great lenses. My favorites are the 18.5mm, 30-110mm and the 6.7- 13mm.
6. Great video. I use it for GIF making only.
7. Great raw quality. Great colors, sharpness and all. Very intuitive UI (even the V1).

Nikon 1s are the all time companion camera to me. I will get the V3 for sure.

Chris Kramer 1,

Being both a NEX user, and a Nikon V user (V1 & V2), there is a hell of a difference. Most good E Mount (aka NEX) lenses do not have any OIS/VR/SR, or whatever you call it, so shutter shake is a big problem! And the shutter shake is very evident, no doubt about that. The V series cameras (and the the rest of the Nikon 1 cameras) are totally silent, vibration-less, and discreet.

The vibration from the shutter in the NEX, the a6000, and the a7R, is the main reason why they are not a smashing success! The a7s is much better, using the same tricks as the V series ;-)!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 5, 2014 at 16:48 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (432 comments in total)
In reply to:

sceptical1: I really do like the concept of this camera, but the 1' sensor is a bridge too far for me, especially when I can cameras that are not that much bigger with better image performance. I can imagine it being a very good wildlife / action camera with practice and the right lenses and that is of some interest, but why would I think that Olympus (or others) will be better with the right lenses? I have an OMD-10 and just received an OMD-M1 (shot with it the first time yesterday) and the OMD-M1 looks to be a pretty good "action" camera with much higher potential image quality and with very little difference in price (I got mine with a 12-40 2.8 lens for under $1900). That compares very well vs. the Nikon. Further, Olympus is planning on a 300mm f4 prime that should be unreal for wildlife (and probably quite expensive...it is what it is) Unless you really need the very high frame rates, I think there are many better options.
BTW - I love Nikon and have been shooting them forever.

Sceptical1,

Seems we have similar experiences, even if I am an amateur, nowadays (I have used cameras in a former professional life).

The new Nikon 1 VR 70-300 is truly a great lens, and I hope to afford one of my own, soon! My wife's is very attached to hers!

Pixel-peeping, I'd say, from my own experience, that it is on par with the AF-S 80-400 VR II, a lens I just love! That is three-four times heavier then the new 70-300, but is just as sharp, all the way to 300mm, and beyond!

I do not see the 1" cameras as optimal for wide angle photography, like architecture! But I have had fun using my 8mm lens, all the same:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53972325

Direct link | Posted on Jul 5, 2014 at 16:34 UTC
On Getting off the ground: Cheap drones for photography article (141 comments in total)

It is not surprising that drones that can do more serious photography also cost a lot more, often equipped with eight, or sixteen, props!

Using slow-flying model aircraft is often much better, but they can't stop in midair, of course!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 3, 2014 at 23:35 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (432 comments in total)
In reply to:

sceptical1: I really do like the concept of this camera, but the 1' sensor is a bridge too far for me, especially when I can cameras that are not that much bigger with better image performance. I can imagine it being a very good wildlife / action camera with practice and the right lenses and that is of some interest, but why would I think that Olympus (or others) will be better with the right lenses? I have an OMD-10 and just received an OMD-M1 (shot with it the first time yesterday) and the OMD-M1 looks to be a pretty good "action" camera with much higher potential image quality and with very little difference in price (I got mine with a 12-40 2.8 lens for under $1900). That compares very well vs. the Nikon. Further, Olympus is planning on a 300mm f4 prime that should be unreal for wildlife (and probably quite expensive...it is what it is) Unless you really need the very high frame rates, I think there are many better options.
BTW - I love Nikon and have been shooting them forever.

Sceptical,

I hope that lens will be a success, and not cost as much as older 43 lenses do! Good luck with the E-M1 (another fairly costly item).

The new Nikon 1 VR 70-300 is stunningly sharp (equal to the 80-400 you have - I do love that lens), and if it is combined with a V3 the results are excellent! My wife has the lens, and I have the 80-400, and I can't see any difference in the resulting images at pixel-peeking distance! When using the same camera on both, of course!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2014 at 21:35 UTC
Total: 398, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »