MPA1

MPA1

Lives in New Zealand (Aotearoa) New Zealand (Aotearoa)
Works as a Photographer
Has a website at www.marcusadamsphoto.co.nz
Joined on Jun 14, 2010
About me:

Professional commercial and editorial photographer. Organiser and guide for private small group photography tours throughout New Zealand.

Comments

Total: 408, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

JackM: Look, a DSLR!

Minus the mirror box..

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2015 at 10:48 UTC
In reply to:

Marty4650: Except for that 28mm prime, those are some really big lenses!

They probably are pretty good lenses, but it defeats the purpose of buying the "smallest FF body" when you need to attach a big honking lens to it.

Of course, everything is relative. I'd say these kits are still a lot more compact than any Nikon D810 with similar lenses....

You can't make the lenses small and keep the sensor big. Physics!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 23:17 UTC

No camera without a viewfinder can be taken seriously.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 21:44 UTC as 136th comment | 1 reply

Seems pretty niche to me!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 02:35 UTC as 27th comment
On Go wide! Hands-on with Canon's 11-24mm F4 L article (224 comments in total)
In reply to:

Douglas F Watt: How does it get to be so big at just slightly wider (11mm vs the 12mm of the Nikon), while the Nikon is 2.8 and it's f4? Don't get that one . . . .

Because the Nikon is a better lens..

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 08:17 UTC
On Go wide! Hands-on with Canon's 11-24mm F4 L article (224 comments in total)

Only f4? Who wants a lens that slow? I think the Nikon 14-24 f2.8 is still better.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 08:17 UTC as 34th comment | 3 replies
On Hands-on with Canon's 'not-coming-to-USA' EOS M3 article (532 comments in total)
In reply to:

MPA1: It seems to be missing an essential (IMV) component: a viewfinder.

An LCD is NOT a viewfinder. It is a screen.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 23:03 UTC
On Hands-on with Canon's 'not-coming-to-USA' EOS M3 article (532 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mike FL: 'not-coming-to-USA' = Gun shy for the USA market.

Or too complex for Americans?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 23:02 UTC
On Hands-on with Canon's 'not-coming-to-USA' EOS M3 article (532 comments in total)

So where is it going if not the USA?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 23:01 UTC as 84th comment | 5 replies
On Canon EOS 5DS / SR First Impressions Review preview (2340 comments in total)

Technically impressive but practicality lacking for many uses - which at least they seem to have recognised.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 08:31 UTC as 518th comment | 3 replies
On Hands-on with Canon's 'not-coming-to-USA' EOS M3 article (532 comments in total)

It seems to be missing an essential (IMV) component: a viewfinder.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 04:48 UTC as 158th comment | 4 replies

It's no ME Super, is it?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2015 at 23:06 UTC as 157th comment
On 2014 Readers' Polls: The results are in! article (378 comments in total)
In reply to:

Fogsprig: I've got E-M10. Of course, I gave it my vote BUT the real best product of 2014 is A7S (absent in polls, to my surprise).
P.S. You guys are weird in that A7II craze.

I agree that it is odd the finest low light still camera ever made is not in the running!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2015 at 00:41 UTC
On 2014 Readers' Polls: The results are in! article (378 comments in total)
In reply to:

MPA1: How can that Sony win - it's not even in the shops in NZ yet!

I say it because it has been available for such a short time that it cannot realistically have been evaluated by people voting for it. Frankly a product that has not yet completed worldwide release should not even be in the list.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2015 at 00:40 UTC
On 2014 Readers' Polls: The results are in! article (378 comments in total)

Where is the awesome D810 in this?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2015 at 10:23 UTC as 69th comment | 9 replies
On 2014 Readers' Polls: The results are in! article (378 comments in total)
In reply to:

Caerolle: Wow, X-T1, Best Camera. I will never understand that. Pretty camera, though.

edit: Ooops, Runner-up. I guess there were two runners-up. How it beat the D750 is beyond me, though, and I hate Nikon cameras. Size and weight, I guess, and old-dude controls.

Yes they hamstrung it with poor high ISO RAW abilities which renders it useless to me.
It does look nice though which is important for consumer cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2015 at 10:22 UTC
On 2014 Readers' Polls: The results are in! article (378 comments in total)

How can that Sony win - it's not even in the shops in NZ yet!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2015 at 10:14 UTC as 72nd comment | 11 replies
On Adobe details OS support for next version of Lightroom article (229 comments in total)
In reply to:

Suave: So, even slower and more resource hungry?

Runs just fine on my i7 iMac with 32Gb RAM.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2015 at 02:52 UTC
On Adobe details OS support for next version of Lightroom article (229 comments in total)
In reply to:

dgeugene1: Is this really necessary? I seem able to make good pictures with stone age software.

You can make good pictures with film if you like..!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2015 at 22:29 UTC
On Adobe details OS support for next version of Lightroom article (229 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: Lightroom really needs a panorama, and HDR feature. A face detection feature that exposes for subjects faces would be nice also. Maybe its too much to ask, but full GPU acceleration would be great for high MP cameras.

HDR sucks IMV - I have yet to see a normal looking image produced that way, so as far as I am concerned that is one thing it doesn't need.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2015 at 22:28 UTC
Total: 408, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »